On CBS.com: Sexy women of CBS
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Patrick Gray
Posted on ZDNet News: Dec 4, 2003 2:20:00 PM

Hackers have forced the Gentoo Linux project to take a server offline

The attack and subsequent compromise comes after several machines belonging to the Debian Linux project were breached by attackers last month. A forensic analysis of the Debian machines revealed that no software packages or source code offered for download were affected--a claim now being made by Gentoo.


Get Up to Speed on...
Open source
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


The maintainers of the Gentoo Linux distribution released a statement that describes the incident: "One of the servers that makes up the rsync.gentoo.org rotation was compromised via a remote exploit," it reads. "The compromised system had both an IDS and a file integrity checker installed and...we are reasonably confident that the portage tree stored on that box was unaffected."

The Gentoo team claimed that the breach was detected within approximately 1 hour.

"During this time, approximately 20 users synchronized against the portage mirror stored on this box. The method used to gain access to the box remotely is still under investigation. We will release more details once we have ascertained the cause of the remote exploit," the statement said.

The machine didn't actually belong to the project. It was donated by a sponsor, whose identity so far undisclosed.


Get Up to Speed on...
Enterprise security
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


The Debian project servers were compromised by a previously unknown local vulnerability in the Linux kernel which has since been identified and rectified by a patch.

Patrick Gray of ZDNet Australia reported from Sydney.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 65 Talkback(s)
It was an evil M$ spell
LINUX is untouchable, this is MICRO$OFT fault. It may have release an evil spell on the server, Linux has no bugs, it is bill gates fault...... (Read the rest)
Posted by: theraven_z Posted on: 06/27/05 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Hacked Linux? Octol   | 12/04/03
Nothing like a little schadenfreude... frgough@...   | 12/04/03
What's the matter? John Dulles   | 12/04/03
what medicine? ryusen   | 12/04/03
Hmmm . . . SCO maybe ? meveridge_z   | 12/06/03
pst stephen732@...   | 12/04/03
It was the "admin's" fault... GRindinAxTaRupy   | 12/04/03
Unknown my foot John Dulles   | 12/04/03
puma ignoramus nikoli   | 12/04/03
Did you smoke ... dopeshow   | 12/04/03
Re: Hacked Linux? Martin Marvinski   | 12/04/03
reputable linux user? nikoli   | 12/04/03
really? ryusen   | 12/04/03
sorry engel000   | 12/05/03
Hacked Linux? Yes Clete2   | 12/09/03
oops Clete2   | 12/09/03
It was an evil M$ spell theraven_z   | 06/27/05
The bigger the target... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/04/03
Then why isn't apache hacked... GRindinAxTaRupy   | 12/04/03
Uh huh... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/04/03
m$ #1 stephen732@...   | 12/04/03
Gentoo runs Windows???? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/04/03
Then what... GRindinAxTaRupy   | 12/04/03
You certainly are something "GRindinAxTaRupy" toadlife   | 12/04/03
Yes, Linux has vunerabilities. nucrash   | 12/04/03
Re: Yes, Linux has vunerabilities. Martin Marvinski   | 12/04/03
Missed the point of that post GRindinAxTaRupy   | 12/04/03
That doesn't surprise anyone... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/04/03
Gee Bit..thought condescending snotty replies... GRindinAxTaRupy   | 12/04/03
For my coat tail riders I make an exception. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/04/03
No credible argument? toadlife   | 12/04/03
How many bugs in IIS jasonp@...   | 12/04/03
What a sad excuse. dopeshow   | 12/04/03
As i said before: ryusen   | 12/04/03
Yes! John Le'Brecage   | 12/04/03
Correction... John Le'Brecage   | 12/04/03
Had to be the Administrator, its not an OS issue FilledOut   | 12/04/03
More than likely.. vdraken   | 12/04/03
Yes, it is the rsync! dopeshow   | 12/04/03
Never had a need to. vdraken   | 12/04/03
Linux being hacked crocd   | 12/04/03
Because they can. vdraken   | 12/04/03
usually though, ryusen   | 12/04/03
It's because John Dulles   | 12/04/03
Yes indeed... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/04/03
Yes indeed GRindinAxTaRupy   | 12/04/03
Not sure of the #'s Suicida|   | 12/07/03
cheap thrill crocd   | 12/04/03
Vulnerable Linux vs. Multi-Billion $$$ MS Antics michael-t   | 12/04/03
Don't blame us, the other guy is worse? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 12/04/03
don't usually agree with you but... nikoli   | 12/04/03
Correction Needed? michael-t   | 12/04/03
Best Practice = Best Answer michael-t   | 12/04/03
compromised to a LESSER degree than Linux... toadlife   | 12/04/03
*BSD is Unix michael-t   | 12/04/03
Rearrange Yagotta B. Kidding   | 12/04/03
It is impossible michael-t   | 12/04/03
Nitpick all you want but toadlife   | 12/04/03
Unix vs *BSD vs Linux michael-t   | 12/04/03
Be fair Rokstar83   | 12/05/03
The Ultimate Security Tool nucrash   | 12/04/03
Interesting Point michael-t   | 12/04/03
So is OS X Server now the only.... mlindl   | 12/05/03
michael-t noShut_z   | 12/05/03
Thanks michael-t   | 12/05/03

What do you think?

advertisement
Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

Fusion

advertisement
Click Here