On The Insider: Sexy Aussie Babes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Robert Lemos, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Mar 19, 2004 11:00:00 PM

More companies suffered extensive virus infections in 2003 than in the previous year and spent on average almost $100,000 to clean up each attack, according to new research.

The Computer Virus Prevalence Survey found that last year, almost a third of the hundreds of businesses polled worldwide had suffered a virus "disaster," defined as 25 or more computers infected by a single virus in the same incident. The report was released on Friday by the ICSA Labs subsidiary of security firm TruSecure.


Get Up to Speed on...
Enterprise security
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


"The re-emergence of 'outbreak events' and the success of mass-mailers in early 2004 illustrates that organizations are not making enough progress in their defense against malicious code," Larry Bridwell, a content-security program manager at ICSA Labs, said in a statement.

The survey polled 300 randomly selected companies and found that 92 had had major virus incidents in 2003, up from 80 in the year before. The cost to recover from the incidents also increased, to almost $100,000 last year from $81,000 in 2002. Moreover, nearly 11 percent of all their machines were infected every month, according to the survey.

The numbers indicate that antivirus software isn't proof against infection. Almost all of the companies surveyed said that at least 90 percent of their desktops have antivirus protection, but still a third of the companies suffered virus disasters.

The issues is not that such software doesn't work, but that it is inherently reactive, Bridwell said. First, a virus has to be detected, and then a cure has to be created and downloaded to all antivirus tools.

"No matter how fast the antivirus industry is, no one can react fast enough," he said. "Corporations are having to be much more proactive in their policies."

The MSBlast worm, also known as Blaster, affected the most computers among the businesses surveyed, infecting almost 130,000 systems of the some 960,000 computers used by the companies. Other top threats were the Microsoft SQL Slammer worm and the Sobig and Klez mass-mailing computer viruses.

More than 80 percent of virus disasters involved one or more computer servers. The servers had to be taken down for an average of 17 hours as a result, the report said. While companies estimated the average dollar cost of a virus disaster at nearly $100,000, the most common answer was much less, at $10,000.

More than three-quarters of respondents said that outages had caused a loss of productivity, and two-thirds indicated that a major effect of an attack was to make a PC inaccessible. Corrupted files and inaccessible data were the other top virus effects.

Microsoft and antivirus firms Network Associates and Trend Micro sponsored the report.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 34 Talkback(s)
If Everyone Used Linix -- Execute bit
Excuse me, but it most certainly is NOT necessary for the
user to turn on the execute bit in Linux/Unix/MacOS X
(BSD) software to make it execute. The programs on CD-
ROM's and down-loaded... (Read the rest)
Posted by: SilverEagle_z Posted on: 03/27/04 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
blah carbon-12   | 03/19/04
does anyone see a correlation? stephen732@...   | 03/19/04
One train, just switch to Linux FilledOut   | 03/19/04
Costs too much jfrankcarr   | 03/19/04
your forgetting something stephen732@...   | 03/19/04
That is a consideration jfrankcarr   | 03/20/04
RE: That is a consideration nite_w0lf   | 03/20/04
Delegating virus software jfrankcarr   | 03/20/04
2000/05/28:Microsoft Applications Security And The Internet David Mohring   | 03/19/04
Pretty dated information there. jfrankcarr   | 03/19/04
If anything, its worse - Phishing for IE vulnerabilities David Mohring   | 03/19/04
Have to somewhat disagree based on my experience jfrankcarr   | 03/20/04
a laptop solution Iain_Peters   | 03/20/04
Do you plan on collecting your bonus anytime in the future? David Mohring   | 03/20/04
You're still talking about 2000 era threats jfrankcarr   | 03/20/04
Did you even bother to read what I wrote? David Mohring   | 03/20/04
The exploits are scripting related jfrankcarr   | 03/20/04
So how much does Windows really cost??? DonnieBoy   | 03/19/04
Still think M$ has a lower TCO? carbon-12   | 03/19/04
TCO THIS! spinit   | 03/20/04
If Everyone Used Linix == Same problems lslade   | 03/20/04
RE: If Everyone Used Linix == Same problems - rubbish Iain_Peters   | 03/20/04
RE: If Everyone Used Linix == Same problems - rubbish seosamh_z   | 03/21/04
The problem is when MSCEs talk *nix security Richard Flude   | 03/21/04
IIS vs Apache doe_z   | 03/20/04
Linux CAN be made secure relative to Windows... deathbymilkfloat   | 03/20/04
Linux CAN be made secure relative to Windows... seosamh_z   | 03/21/04
just out of curiosity, how did you ever find your way onto the net! nite_w0lf   | 03/20/04
If Everyone Used Linix -- Execute bit SilverEagle_z   | 03/27/04
TCO! TCO! Get The Facts! TCO! B_HI   | 03/20/04
Mindless Sheep? TWRX   | 03/20/04
Stupid response to a stupid post? ZorakQMantis   | 03/21/04
And the viruses are spreading to automobiles Squawkbox   | 03/20/04
and where do we get these figures JWatson77   | 03/24/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
Click Here