On TV.com: KIM KARDASHIAN is hot hot hot
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Robert Lemos, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Apr 15, 2004 12:32:00 AM

The crush of millions of Windows users trying to patch their computers overwhelmed Microsoft's update service for several hours after new security fixes were made available, the software giant acknowledged on Wednesday.


Get Up to Speed on...
Enterprise security
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


Immediately after Tuesday's release of four patches that fixed a score of flaws in the company's operating system, traffic to Microsoft's Windows Update site spiked higher than seen during any previous update, reaching a sustained download rate of more then 50GB per second. Past patches have resulted in 2 million people visiting Microsoft's Windows Update site every hour to download fixes. This time, between 3 million and 4 million users came to the site.

As a result, many customers found that the scan didn't work properly and they were not able to download the latest patches.

"When the patches went out yesterday there was a significant wave," said Todd Weeks, director of operations for Microsoft.com. The increase led to delays for users who wanted to immediately download the latest patches from the service. "After about the first four hours, it was essentially resolved."

By Tuesday afternoon, the company had about doubled the ability of the servers to handle requests by adding more servers that had better processors, Weeks said. By Wednesday morning, the software giant's update servers were handling 4 million visitors every hour with no issues, he said.

The events present the latest problem for Microsoft as it continues its two-year-old Trustworthy Computing initiative. Although the software giant has taken major steps to alleviate security concerns, such as delaying its next version of Windows in order to divert developers to its Windows XP Service Pack 2 security update, Microsoft has also had to contend with releases of critical patches to deal with large virus epidemics among customers.

Nonprofit group Pathfinder International encountered delays in updating its Microsoft computers Wednesday, said Kevin Greene, senior network administrator for the group. Pathfinder has servers in the United States, Peru, Brazil, Bolivia, Bangladesh, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Nigeria, Vietnam, Pakistan, Yemen, Tanzania and Uganda. After one of those computers had been infected by the MSBlast worm last August, the group focused on applying patches as soon as possible.

"Microsoft's decision to release updates to 90 percent of the computers on the planet on the same day, coupled with its announced desire for us to all update on the same day, places a considerable burden on Microsoft to ensure it has the bandwidth, equipment and other infrastructure necessary to ensure that we can do that efficiently," Greene said. "My experience this morning, and in the last round of updates in February, indicates that the infrastructure is lacking."

Internet performance measurement service Netcraft noted the problems as well, stating: "A browser request through Internet Explorer eventually raises the site after an extended wait, and in some cases it is possible to successfully download and install updates over a broadband connection."

The flood of users led Microsoft to add the ability to regulate the rate at which Windows Update will try to download patches from the company's servers, Weeks said. The new feature will act as a spigot on the electronic data, evening out the demand for downloads.

The current problems were solved by throwing more computing power at the issue, said Stephen Toulouse, Microsoft's security program manager. He added that--on the positive side--the flood of users means more customers are worrying about security.

"People are now just waiting to get the update," he said. "We are pleased (that customers are more aware). We will do whatever it takes to provide these updates to our customers as demand increases."

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 56 Talkback(s)
The Last Word
"During June and July of 2000, the Hotmail site was converted from FreeBSD running Apache Web services to Windows 2000 Server running Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0."

or

(Read the rest)
Posted by: ShadeTree Posted on: 04/16/04 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
If they only said... voiceofreason_z   | 04/14/04
4 mill per hour = 100 mill happy customers a day oldskool   | 04/14/04
Don't be silly StorageGuru   | 04/14/04
Another Evelyn Wood grad, I see... Yen_z   | 04/14/04
you better hope MS update didn't crash MS's service oldskool   | 04/14/04
Flawed logic ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
Correction! ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
Good thing they use Linux to cache their sites .... oldskool   | 04/15/04
You missed the point of the article el1jones   | 04/15/04
I missed nothing ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
HW upgrade fixed problem ? Did they add more linux caches? oldskool   | 04/15/04
oldskool please get the facts ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
Shadetree - didn't read the full article ... again... el1jones   | 04/15/04
Your own reference says MS moved off Windows to Hotmail oldskool   | 04/15/04
el1jones and oldskool can't face the truth ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
Since when does Hotmail not run on Linux? oldskool   | 04/15/04
Waiting for proof oldskool ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
Its not the network address doing the work .... oldskool   | 04/15/04
You have demonstrated nothing oldskool ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
Proof of what Hotmail runs on. ShadeTree   | 04/16/04
but they don't actually offer it up, Akamai does Monkey_MCSE   | 04/15/04
or was it conexion?(NT) Monkey_MCSE   | 04/15/04
Actually Savvis Comunications ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
and tonight its not SAVISS Windows 2003 but Hotmail/Linux oldskool   | 04/15/04
Keep on Grindin oldskool ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
your right, its not LINUX but *NIX holding up Hotmail oldskool   | 04/15/04
And it seems load balancing is done by CISCO's LD oldskool   | 04/15/04
Still no proof! oldskool ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
ya know what Shady, MS hasn't shut that content down! oldskool   | 04/15/04
If your article were true... ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
Wow, still going... Okay here's what I know... el1jones   | 04/15/04
And you know this because... ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
The Last Word ShadeTree   | 04/16/04
Glad Windows is a dying platform Chad_z   | 04/15/04
How is it dying? ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
Read His Post Again Letophoro   | 04/15/04
Again?! It wasn't read once! el1jones   | 04/15/04
Must be nice CaptZapp   | 04/15/04
Not to mention... Jack-Booted EULA   | 04/15/04
It's dying in my house... ...that's a start. Oscar_Goldman   | 04/15/04
This is bad news ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
don't worry, they will be back V Sanders   | 04/16/04
How is it dying?.. Can you say saturated market... FreeBSD   | 04/15/04
The OEMs are shipping about... ShadeTree   | 04/15/04
Stampede...NOT...automatic update...Yep! Grimm Reaper   | 04/15/04
Good point (NT) el1jones   | 04/15/04
We tried to tell them... KOS-MOS   | 04/15/04
Hey, Where's Cox? el1jones   | 04/15/04
Busy trying to download the updates avdp   | 04/15/04
Why not... ryusen   | 04/15/04
the article is guessing V Sanders   | 04/16/04
I had problems downloading as well V Sanders   | 04/16/04
Yep very slow to initialize and finish FilledOut   | 04/16/04
Yep very slow to initialize and finish FilledOut   | 04/16/04
Big problems with the update lcseh   | 04/16/04
I don't know about that 4 hours . . . rlalogia   | 04/16/04

What do you think?

advertisement