On TV.com: ANGELINA JOLIE looks stunning as usual
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Robert Lemos, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Jun 25, 2004 4:03:00 PM

update Security researchers warned Web surfers on Thursday to be on guard after uncovering evidence that widespread Web server compromises have turned corporate home pages into points of digital infection.

The researchers believe that online organized crime groups are breaking into Web servers and surreptitiously inserting code that takes advantage of two flaws in Internet Explorer that Microsoft has not yet fixed. Those flaws allow the Web server to install a program that takes control of the user's computer.

News.context

What's new:
Intruders are using compromised Web sites to infect visitors' PCs though two Internet Explorer flaws.

Bottom line:
This method of attack is increasingly being used by the Internet underground. While it's unknown how many Web sites carry the malicious program, Windows users should turn their IE security to the highest setting or install a third-party browser.

Click here for more stories on this topic

Late Thursday, Microsoft advised customers to increase their browser security to the highest settings, although that could cause some Web site functions to stop working.

The extent of the attacks is unknown, but the security community has seen numerous cases of personal computers infected when the user merely visits a Web site.

"It is not epidemic, but it is being seen," said Alfred Huger, senior director of engineering for security company Symantec. "Do we think it is serious? Yeah. It's a concern and it's insidious."

The tactic is not new. Earlier this month, an independent security researcher found an aggressive advertising program, known as adware, that installed itself onto a victim's computer via the same two flaws in Internet Explorer. A large financial client called in Symantec in late April after an employee's system had been infected when he used Internet Explorer to browse an infected Web site. Last fall, a similar attack may have been facilitated through a mass intrusion at Interland, said sources familiar with that case.

This time, however, the flaws affect every user of Internet Explorer, because Microsoft has not yet released a patch. Moreover, the infectious Web sites are not just those of minor companies inhabiting the backwaters of the Web, but major companies, including some banks, said Brent Houlahan, chief technology officer of NetSec.

"There's a pretty wide variety," he said. "There are auction sites, price comparison sites and financial institutions."


CNET Reviews
Attack prevention
Malicious code infects PCs
via popular Web site pages.
Here's how it works and how
to guard against it.


The Internet Storm Center, which monitors Net threats, confirmed that the list of infected sites included some large Web properties.

"We won't list the sites that are reported to be infected in order to prevent further abuse, but the list is long and includes businesses that we presume would normally be keeping their sites fully patched," the group stated on its Web site.

The group also pointed out that the malicious program uploaded to a victim's computer is not currently detected as a virus by most antivirus software. With no patch from Microsoft, that leaves Internet Explorer users vulnerable. A representative of the software giant was not immediately available for comment on when a patch might be available.

Researchers believe that attackers seed the Web sites with malicious code by breaking into unsecured servers or by using a previously unknown vulnerability in Microsoft's Web software, Internet Information Server (IIS). When a victim browses the site, the code redirects them to one of two sites, most often to another server in Russia. That server uses the pair of Microsoft Internet Explorer vulnerabilities to upload and execute a remote access Trojan horse, RAT, to the victim's PC. The software records the victim's keystrokes and opens a back door in the system's security to allow the attacker to access the computer.

Currently, researchers have two theories as to who is behind the attacks. The Internet Storm Center pointed to the similarities between these attacks and previous virus epidemics aimed at co-opting computers for use in illegal spam networks.


Get Up to Speed on...
Enterprise security
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


"There is quite a bit of evidence that what we are seeing is yet another technique for spreading and installing 'spamware,'" the group stated on its site. "We don't see any evidence that this attack is related to the construction of a DDoS (distributed denial of service) network or other type of typical zombie-based attack group."

However, Symantec believes that the attacks last fall and in April, which the current one most resembles, were conducted by online organized crime groups from Russia. The theory is supported not only by the fact that the server storing the malicious code is in Russia, but also by the sophisticated nature of the attacks, Symantec's Huger said.

"It's a group of people that have resources to bring to play," he said, adding that the attack programs were not amateur material. "The code wasn't pulled off a Web site; it was custom."

Meanwhile, the average Internet surfer is left with few options. Besides choosing the highest security settings for Internet Explorer, Windows users could download an alternate browser, such as Mozilla or Opera. Mac users are not in danger.

NetSec's Houlahan advocated drastic action.

"I told my wife, unless it is absolutely necessary and unless you are going to a site like our banking site, stay off the Internet right now," he said.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 143 Talkback(s)
Get the Maxthon browser!!!!!
Get the Maxthon browser (formerly MyIE2) Version=1.1.0.35. Go to http://www.maxthon.com/en/index.htm for the ultimate browser. Serious... (Read the rest)
Posted by: ckone Posted on: 09/30/04 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Not just attacking the MS xshakes   | 06/24/04
I'll bite. toadlife   | 06/25/04
This is not about bad admins xshakes   | 06/25/04
Of course your reliability is better doug@...   | 06/25/04
If you changed from NT to a version of Linux swoopee   | 06/25/04
Win2k3 <> Increased Security ITGuy04   | 06/25/04
huh? toadlife   | 06/25/04
Because it's not? cbiltcliffe@...   | 06/26/04
Partly about bad admins... PA-ITGuy   | 06/25/04
Correction PA-ITGuy   | 06/25/04
Re-read that article CO_TechGuy   | 06/25/04
not clear PA-ITGuy   | 06/25/04
Incorrect - it is (partially) about admins CO_TechGuy   | 06/25/04
Are you aware of your contradiction?.. Jeff Spicoli   | 06/25/04
i want to contest that statement... ryusen   | 06/25/04
I know Jeff Spicoli   | 06/25/04
Re: CO_TechGuy   | 06/25/04
Are you aware of your arrogance? toadlife   | 06/25/04
What about patches? lengua99   | 06/28/04
MS IIS is the most popular webserver around jrbeaman   | 06/25/04
you might be right, but your point is still moot... ryusen   | 06/25/04
I knew I'd get tons of responses to that toadlife   | 06/25/04
Thank you Microsoft.. Rajah46   | 06/24/04
Ignorance won't get you anywhere. nikoli   | 06/24/04
true but.. Jeff Spicoli   | 06/25/04
but.. d_jedi   | 06/25/04
True but.. Jeff Spicoli   | 06/25/04
There is danger for Mozilla & Firefox, too. Raymond Danner   | 06/25/04
only danger for boneheads Jeff Spicoli   | 06/25/04
only danger for boneheads Jeff Spicoli   | 06/25/04
A few differences j.m.galvin   | 06/25/04
In Windows.. d_jedi   | 06/25/04
not that I like Microsoft.. Jeff Spicoli   | 06/25/04
Mac IE versions stop at 5.2 j.m.galvin   | 06/25/04
Yikes, why would you use IE on a Mac?? Safari dude! Jeff Spicoli   | 06/25/04
I was just pointing out differences, but j.m.galvin   | 06/25/04
This is why I switched doctormoriarty   | 06/25/04
Agreed CO_TechGuy   | 06/25/04
so even the MS PR sites are admitting MS has no security! oldskool   | 06/24/04
Microsoft Windows is flawed by design- it cannot be fixed. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 06/25/04
True but voska   | 06/25/04
I agree, but didn't they say something 2YEARS AGO... Xunil_Sierutuf   | 06/25/04
Yup they did but... voska   | 06/25/04
Professionals..... jrbeaman   | 06/25/04
Why wait?? php_developer   | 06/25/04
And this is a suprise how? Linux User 147560   | 06/24/04
Microsoft Will Be Company of litigation NOT inovation RobertoSalazar   | 06/24/04
Benefits of Linux HappyMSUser   | 06/25/04
Microsoft really DOES "innovate" Joel R   | 06/25/04
Class Action Law Suit Against Bill Gates And Microsoft RobertoSalazar   | 06/24/04
Go for it Loverock Davidson   | 06/25/04
Eulas should be illegal! sa_z   | 06/25/04
ReRead the part jrbeaman   | 06/25/04
No EULA can Protect from Criminal Negligence MoYoToSoTo   | 06/25/04
Product Liability lengua99   | 06/28/04
More Lawyers....Yeah That's The Ticket. chrislovesdana   | 06/25/04
Not the EULA but Criminal Negligence MoYoToSoTo   | 06/25/04
amazing how many ISPs use m$ mvaar   | 06/25/04
Yes their instructions tell you Hanover Phist   | 06/25/04
say what ? mvaar   | 06/25/04
FUDBUSTERS- Tell me again how MS releases patches quicker...? Xunil_Sierutuf   | 06/25/04
Exactlly! sa_z   | 06/25/04
You Can't Take Over The World Exploiting A Mac Vulnerability chrislovesdana   | 06/25/04
Dream on... gfeier   | 06/25/04
You sound like an open source advocate tic swayback   | 06/25/04
Wrong on ALL counts, Chris. Joel R   | 06/25/04
Not to mention... dr_who@...   | 06/25/04
So you're saying that... Rick_K   | 06/29/04
Upgrade free to Mozilla, no problem Hopethishelps3   | 06/25/04
Re: Upgrade free to Mozilla, no problem Me_too   | 06/25/04
Go after spam benefactor TrustMe_z   | 06/25/04
Or, you can make the default setting for ActiveX to not automatically run. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 06/25/04
Use tools better shis-ka-bob   | 06/25/04
I'm not sure about either zdnet or firefox rebeldog   | 06/25/04
Is this site running IIS??????? jrbeaman   | 06/25/04
It's actually running Apache 20075880200550981536805084989909-zdavis   | 06/26/04
Firefox triggers Norton Firewall on my machine G.A.L.   | 06/25/04
You have to configure the firewall doctormoriarty   | 06/25/04
Here's the solution sufehmi   | 06/25/04
Correction: Here is the solution sufehmi   | 06/25/04
Another correction... sufehmi   | 06/25/04
how about a "Preview" button ? jrbeaman   | 06/25/04
MSFT's response is classic Chad_z   | 06/25/04
Windows is an insecure piece of bloated crapware? jrbeaman   | 06/25/04
Maybe PA-ITGuy   | 06/25/04
Ah, you got a second mortgage for that MCSE Chad_z   | 06/27/04
Your own arguments... PA-ITGuy   | 06/28/04
Get a New OS sfhc99@...   | 06/25/04
Get a New OS Loverock Davidson   | 06/25/04
Hmmm woojinlee   | 06/25/04
Exactly! WhoIsDaMan   | 06/25/04
Software? lengua99   | 06/28/04
Only affects Administrative accounts PB_z   | 06/25/04
thank you Hanover Phist   | 06/25/04
tip #1 ZooberSoft   | 06/25/04
Better yet.... quietLee   | 06/25/04
less hassle? ZooberSoft   | 06/25/04
would love to Hanover Phist   | 06/25/04
Good luck! ZooberSoft   | 06/25/04
Thanks Hanover Phist   | 06/25/04
Roaming profiles PB_z   | 06/25/04
cant Hanover Phist   | 06/25/04
Administrative privileges required by applications jpivonka@...   | 06/26/04
These Exploits Might Be Planned by Microsof !!!! MoYoToSoTo   | 06/25/04
HEY STUPID CORPORATE WEB SERVER ADMINS jrbeaman   | 06/25/04
Right ON!! quietLee   | 06/25/04
Yawn fmeschler   | 06/25/04
Black Helicopters pat.patience@...   | 06/25/04
Yeah, blame it on Bush. jrbeaman   | 06/25/04
Sun Java IceTheNet@...   | 06/25/04
"Surf Safe" jrbeaman   | 06/25/04
Use Mozilla and others, but remember, you still can get infected FilledOut   | 06/25/04
Why is ZDnet too afraid to list infected sites? feliusrex   | 06/25/04
I concur AVALAR   | 06/25/04
Ummm http://isc.incidents.org/ said they don't list names Squawkbox   | 06/25/04
Why is ZDnet too afraid to list infected sites? wildwill   | 06/26/04
Infectious Adware and Websites Froggy Leseur   | 06/25/04
Got the wrong one, dude.... quietLee   | 06/25/04
Infectious web sites michael_mccarthy@...   | 06/25/04
Even Homeland security is warning against running Windows! Xunil_Sierutuf   | 06/25/04
NOT! bhanes@...   | 06/25/04
Ahhh... The Inquirer PA-ITGuy   | 06/25/04
Give Us the "2 websites" so we can "hosts" away the threat MrTitanium   | 06/25/04
We bend over and take it in the .... again ScarryJerry   | 06/25/04
Use Mozilla subhunee   | 06/25/04
Nice to see ZDNet so far behind the curve.... quietLee   | 06/25/04
Almost a relevant posting wedge1   | 06/25/04
Warning to all on DealHelper.com SPYWARE realitycheck101   | 06/25/04
ZoneAlarm should be sufficient protection JRobert345   | 06/25/04
Isn't preventing the disease better than treating the symptoms? oldskool   | 06/25/04
When prevention isn't possible... JRobert345   | 06/25/04
Will Adaware or Spybot S&D find it? Squawkbox   | 06/25/04
May be rambler65   | 06/26/04
I wonder michael-t   | 06/25/04
IE vs Netscape garlicfog@...   | 06/25/04
Why do all that? garlicfog@...   | 06/25/04
Gee ZDNet, real "helpful" article KenTankerous   | 06/25/04
Anyone else catch this? Phil Nospam   | 06/26/04
benifit of doubt rambler65   | 06/26/04
Yet another reason why Netscape rules. jgmsys@...   | 06/26/04
A Bit Of Advice About What To Do willtisdale@...   | 06/27/04
Exact Problem tjcal   | 06/27/04
Get the Maxthon browser!!!!! ckone   | 09/30/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement