On GameSpot: Wii Fit tells 10-year-old she's fat
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Munir Kotadia, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: May 24, 2005 6:08:00 PM

Computers running Windows XP Service Pack 2 are 15 times less likely than those running XP or XP SP1 to be infected by some of the most dangerous forms of malware, according to a Microsoft security guru.


Related story
Microsoft: Jot down
your passwords

Jesper Johansson
says the security
industry has been
giving out bad advice.

Jason Garms, who heads the company's anti-malware product team, said Tuesday that this improvement had been revealed by an internal analysis of SP2's performance.

SP2--a major security update released in August--was designed to turn on auto-update by default and consolidate security controls into a "security center."

"A machine that had Windows XP or XP SP1 was 15 times more likely to have one of the highly prevalent top 20 worms installed than on a machine running XP SP2," said Garms, who spoke at a conference sponsored by Australia's national Computer Emergency Response Team, or AusCERT.

He said that the default turning-on of auto update had made a dramatic difference to users. "Within days of Microsoft releasing a patch," he said, "the vast majority of the Windows ecosystem is up to date."

Garms also revealed that Microsoft is planning to release an enterprise version of its anti-spyware tool, which is currently available in beta form on the company's Web site. However, he would not reveal when the new tool would be available, or whether it would be a free utility or sold as a separate application.

"It is currently in our plans (to have) an enterprise offering that addresses spyware," Garms said. "The product and packaging details are still to be decided."

He added that spyware could be responsible for up to one-third of all Windows crashes, citing data culled by the Windows error reporting tool, which sends data back to Microsoft when an application crashes.

"The primary problem that users have with spyware is that their systems crash or are really slow or don't behave in the way they expect them to," Garms said. "We try to figure out how many of the crashes that are reported to us are actually attributable to spyware, and it turns out that at least one-third of those machines had spyware installed on them, so it is a big problem."

Garms noted that people are more worried about their computer behaving erratically and running slowly than they are about being spied upon by malware.

"Some people will have you believe that the primary impact of spyware is the spying on your systems, but that is the secondary impact of spyware," Garms said. Spyware causing crashes and erratic behavior "are the things that generate user help desk calls."

Munir Kotadia reports for ZDNet Australia.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 63 Talkback(s)
LINSUX AND MACINCRAP CAN BE ATTACKED
So wake up everyone. No matter what your system Protect it. (Read the rest)
Posted by: internet11 Posted on: 05/27/05 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
My math is rusty.. 15 * 0 = ummm... 0? Xunil_Sierutuf   | 05/24/05
Lies, dam lies, and statistics. brendthess   | 05/24/05
You mean Null * ANYTHING = Null? Bill_Jackson   | 05/25/05
Only 100 times more to go... BitTwiddler   | 05/24/05
Use FireFox, not IEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE Xunil_Sierutuf   | 05/24/05
wish I could uninstall IE JasonL31   | 05/24/05
You Can Uninstall IE andyhayes1   | 05/24/05
Try Google, it tells you how voska   | 05/24/05
try xplite :-) Arm A. Geddon   | 05/25/05
Use Opera, not Firefoxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx TimeBomb   | 05/24/05
All those "XX", is FireFox better for pr0n? Xunil_Sierutuf   | 05/25/05
Mac OS X, makes your computer completely secure! gtdworak   | 05/24/05
Cut it out, man... slingzenarrowzuvowtrayjissforchin   | 05/24/05
Repeat after me 1000 times Squawkbox   | 05/24/05
I will not feed the trolls d_jedi   | 05/24/05
Whew! Jeff Spicoli   | 05/24/05
Amazing what.. d_jedi   | 05/24/05
I think u missed 1 Linux User 147560   | 05/24/05
Nice try Troll! Reverend MacFellow   | 05/24/05
No, to secure a computer you need to.... nucrash   | 05/25/05
That's Like Saying Using A Condom With A Hole In It Is Safer itanalyst   | 05/24/05
As my Native American Father used to say.. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 05/24/05
Message has been deleted. widge_z   | 05/24/05
That sounds like the South Jersey version.. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 05/24/05
if ms would not have so many HIDDEN place to install and run stuff JasonL31   | 05/24/05
Oh you mean Windows 2000 SP2? Jeff Spicoli   | 05/24/05
Good one, Jeff slingzenarrowzuvowtrayjissforchin   | 05/24/05
Zank you, Sling Ze Arrow Jeff Spicoli   | 05/24/05
Call me when MICROSUCKS gets 10,000 % more secure... realitycheck101   | 05/24/05
Our security guys said it was 20x more secure.. Mike Cox   | 05/24/05
Must have been a fruit bar .......................... Can you hear me   | 05/24/05
9.5 Real World   | 05/24/05
Wow! luke_sg   | 05/24/05
Hey Mike Cox you are indeed anoying, stop this stupid act and get real johnpall@...   | 05/25/05
Hook, line and sinker shallow_diver   | 05/25/05
5.1 Not so good nucrash   | 05/25/05
15 x 0 = ???? Reverend MacFellow   | 05/24/05
Let's see here... rpmyers1   | 05/24/05
Secure surfing with multiple browsers Wagadonga   | 05/24/05
Microsoft: SP2 makes Windows 15 times safer Loverock Davidson   | 05/24/05
You are 15 times more... MepisLINUXuser   | 05/24/05
You are 15 times more... Loverock Davidson   | 05/24/05
I disagree ipm@...   | 05/24/05
I agree too. it's more like... Arm A. Geddon   | 05/25/05
It was only a matter of time michael-t   | 05/24/05
IDIOT EXPLODER IS THE PROBLEM, wake up you Microslaves. MepisLINUXuser   | 05/24/05
Not Neccesarily Stubby_z   | 05/26/05
You do realize... toadlife   | 05/26/05
LINSUX AND MACINCRAP CAN BE ATTACKED internet11   | 05/27/05
Microspy: We collect 15 times more information... MepisLINUXuser   | 05/24/05
What kind of pathetic corporation toots their own... MepisLINUXuser   | 05/24/05
There are so many variables, measuring is... MepisLINUXuser   | 05/24/05
re: There are so many variables, measuring is... redxii   | 05/24/05
Ummm, no... MepisLINUXuser   | 05/25/05
Look out, Microsuck users ChinesePhDinCA   | 05/24/05
It was that bad, huh? lol! bobwinners   | 05/24/05
malware is responsible for 1/3 of the crashes? linuxoverwindows   | 05/25/05
Another 1/3 is caused by.... toadlife   | 05/25/05
Bad drivers are main cause PB_z   | 05/26/05
rotflmao kray_z   | 05/25/05
who cares about security when it locks up your computer dclark4700   | 05/25/05
Do you have an Athlon64 processor? toadlife   | 05/25/05
Do you have an Athlon64 processor? toadlife   | 05/25/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
Click Here