On CNET: Vudu is like Blu-ray in a box
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Joris Evers
Posted on ZDNet News: Oct 6, 2005 10:28:00 PM

Thursday's announcement of Microsoft's Client Protection software marks the company's long-anticipated entry into the market for desktop security products for businesses.

Microsoft faces a tough battle as it competes with established players, including Symantec, McAfee and Trend Micro.

Analysts have criticized Microsoft for being vague about its security product plans. The software maker said Thursday that over the past couple years, it has focused on securing its existing products and improving patching for customers. "Now the effort is shifting to deliver a new generation of security products," said Debby Fry Wilson, director of security engineering and communications.

So what is Client Protection? We'll try to tackle that question below.

What is Microsoft's new security software?
Microsoft Client Protection is software for business PCs and file servers that's designed to offer, in one application, protection against spyware, viruses and root kits. The company says its software will offer IT administrators central management capabilities and that it'll work with the company's Active Directory and Windows Server Updates Services patch management tool.

How is it different from Windows OneCare?
Windows OneCare is the consumer equivalent of Microsoft Client Protection. OneCare has been available to beta testers since earlier this year and will combine antivirus and anti-spyware protection with PC health tools. The consumer product lacks enterprise necessities such as central management. Microsoft said Thursday that a final version of OneCare is due in 2006. It will be sold on a subscription basis. Pricing has not been disclosed.

What is the security technology behind Microsoft Client Protection?
The upcoming product will be built on an enhanced version of the GeCad antivirus software Microsoft acquired in 2003 and the Giant Company Software anti-spyware product it bought in late 2004.

What about Windows AntiSpyware?
Windows AntiSpyware is software that's designed to protect consumer PCs against, of course, spyware. It's based on technology Microsoft acquired from Giant. Windows AntiSpyware has been available in beta test version since January, and the company is expected to deliver a final version in 2006. Microsoft has said the tool will be free.

What does Microsoft Client Protection compete with?
The new product will be up against enterprise security products from established players such as Symantec, McAfee and Trend Micro. Microsoft's product is unproven, and it will take time to allay years of skepticism among business users before the market will accept the offering, Merrill Lynch analysts said Thursday.

What systems will Microsoft Client Protection run on?
It will run on Windows XP and its successor, Windows Vista, which is due late 2006. (Vista was previously known by its Longhorn code name.)

How much will it cost?
Microsoft has not yet disclosed pricing or licensing details. Client Protection will likely be sold on a license basis, as opposed to a subscription model.

When will it be available?
A "limited beta" is due by year's end. Microsoft is sending mixed messages about when a final version of the product will ship. Fry Wilson declined on Thursday to specify a delivery target for Client Protection, but a document published to the Microsoft Web site Thursday shows a 2006 ship target. (Download Word document.)

When will more details be available?
Microsoft says it expects to be able to provide more information in the coming months.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 69 Talkback(s)
Hahaha, it's a starting point =P
Didn't mean for you to take that literally. Apologies if you misunderstood. The site has a "search" function so you can "narrow" it down. The point is Linux has had a LOT more "releases" than Windo... (Read the rest)
Posted by: java.user Posted on: 10/10/05 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
I ...I .... I'm at a loss for comment rick752   | 10/06/05
Now, before you go attacking Microsoft- carlito408@...   | 10/06/05
Out of curiosity... java.user   | 10/06/05
A partial answer. Cardinal_Bill   | 10/06/05
Well, right now, with Linux, yes. There are no viruses / worms out there of DonnieBoy   | 10/07/05
Riiiight, there are no Lnux exploits... Real World   | 10/07/05
Nice MS marketing line jacarter3   | 10/07/05
Aparently you missed the part Real World   | 10/07/05
I got your point jacarter3   | 10/07/05
Here is what you clearly don't get Real World   | 10/07/05
56 known Linux 2.6.x security advisories java.user   | 10/07/05
Read it again... jacarter3   | 10/07/05
Read the security reports java.user   | 10/07/05
56 known Linux 2.6.x security advisories jacarter3   | 10/07/05
Missed the point have we? java.user   | 10/07/05
The point jacarter3   | 10/07/05
mjb: I did NOT say that Linux has no viruses. I said that DonnieBoy   | 10/07/05
In closing Real World   | 10/07/05
In closing. Getting a virus on a Windows desktop is 10,000 x more likely DonnieBoy   | 10/07/05
re: the Point java.user   | 10/07/05
Still, you would be more likely to be hit by lightning that get a virus DonnieBoy   | 10/07/05
Experts disagree java.user   | 10/07/05
Well, we can agree in many places, with the small number of Linux users, DonnieBoy   | 10/07/05
Oh, that report of Linux antivirus demand growing was from March 2003 DonnieBoy   | 10/07/05
Sources? java.user   | 10/07/05
Actually... yes. sgk284   | 10/07/05
A few corrections java.user   | 10/07/05
One more thing sgk284   | 10/07/05
Actually I was arguing XP not Vista java.user   | 10/07/05
FAQ: Inside Microsoft's Client Protection Loverock Davidson   | 10/06/05
And I'm impressed too! Jeff Spicoli   | 10/06/05
Ya gotta understand Loverock D . . . abcpc123   | 10/07/05
Yes, Loveboy does have his head that far... jacarter3   | 10/07/05
LOOK HERE EVERYONE!!! Loverock Davidson   | 10/07/05
Look here everyone! jacarter3   | 10/07/05
You see that Loverock Davidson   | 10/07/05
Your team jacarter3   | 10/07/05
You're looking at this wrong sgk284   | 10/07/05
I'm looking at it positively Loverock Davidson   | 10/07/05
Positively jacarter3   | 10/07/05
internet was going to explode jacarter3   | 10/07/05
1998? friedcow   | 10/07/05
1995 jacarter3   | 10/07/05
Agree with Ax on this one rick752   | 10/07/05
Let's count java.user   | 10/07/05
LOL, sorry but counting distros isn't right maldain   | 10/10/05
Hahaha, it's a starting point =P java.user   | 10/10/05
Just one little tidbit sgk284   | 10/07/05
RHN java.user   | 10/07/05
MS Security sgk284   | 10/07/05
It's a work in progress java.user   | 10/07/05
It's a mixed bag, but it's not as good as you make it out to be. olePigeon   | 10/07/05
DAMN! Cardinal_Bill   | 10/06/05
no need to worry Jeff Spicoli   | 10/06/05
LOL java.user   | 10/06/05
No kidding Chad_z   | 10/07/05
I've said it before and I'll say it again Michael Kelly   | 10/07/05
I agree with ya Mike Monkey_MCSE   | 10/07/05
The difference is Michael Kelly   | 10/07/05
because... Monkey_MCSE   | 10/07/05
forgot one thing Mike Monkey_MCSE   | 10/07/05
Still don't think that would fly Michael Kelly   | 10/07/05
It doesn't matter that they left the hole Real World   | 10/07/05
Actually Michael Kelly   | 10/07/05
AN Advertisement for Microsoft DarbyOhara   | 10/07/05
Like the electric utility selling you a back up generator because jupco   | 10/07/05
Yep java.user   | 10/07/05
Is everyone missing the obvious here? Sir_Chancealot   | 10/07/05
If you thing THIS article is amusing ... rick752   | 10/07/05

What do you think?