On TechRepublic: FREE download: Social networking policy
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Declan McCullagh
Posted on ZDNet News: Feb 5, 2004 10:02:00 PM

The U.S. Army has apologized for threatening to prosecute an open-government advocacy group after it republished a document copied from a military Web site.

An official with the U.S. Army Services and Operations Agency on Wednesday accused the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) of publishing a secret government document about acquiring military hardware--before backing down a few hours later.

"Reproducing a secret publication on a public Web site is a serious issue with federal criminal implications," Thomas Harman, chief of the Army's electronic library branch, had written in an e-mail message to FAS.

After an official in the Secretary of the Army's office raised questions about whether the document was in fact classified, Harman said he had made a mistake. A later version of the regulation, AR 381-26, was the classified document, Harman said in a follow-up e-mail message.

In a telephone conversation with CNET News.com on Thursday, Harman acknowledged the error. "I'm sending (FAS) an apology right now for how that went down," he said. "We finally got a legal clarification yesterday that I think will keep me and other people like me from reacting the way we did yesterday on security issues."

Steven Aftergood, head of the FAS Project on Government Secrecy, said the e-mail messages appeared to be part of the Pentagon's growing efforts to delete unclassified documents from the Web. "Increasingly all this material is being removed from the public domain," said Aftergood, whose organization maintains an online library of unclassified government documents.

The AR 381-26 regulation deals with the acquisition of foreign military hardware, a key function of U.S. military intelligence.

In January 2003, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld warned in a directive distributed through the military that too much unclassified but worrisome material was popping up on the Web, and warned that al-Qaida and other foes were sure to take advantage of it.

"At the time, yesterday morning, I thought I had a serious situation," said the Army's Harman. "There was a problem with getting the right background. I've learned something from it."

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 13 Talkback(s)
Please explain the connection
The article is about the publication of a secret document that turned out not to be secret, in which case, the correct response from the Army should have been an apology (it's neither illegal nor immo... (Read the rest)
Posted by: John L. Ries Posted on: 02/09/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
New threats, new world  Christian_<>< | 02/05/04
new threat from...  stephen732@... | 02/05/04
The article is fuzzy.  Cardinal_Bill | 02/05/04
yeah  JWatson77 | 02/05/04
NOT fuzzy  Christian_<>< | 02/06/04
Please explain the connection  John L. Ries | 02/09/04
Absolutely. We need more lawsuits.  DanIelWalker_z | 02/06/04
Agree, sue the Clinton 'crooks'  Christian_<>< | 02/06/04
boy oh boy oh boy  NemesisNL | 02/06/04
Security Oversite  jerry@... | 02/06/04
The whole truth on National Security  Christian_<>< | 02/06/04
You keep getting worse and worse  NemesisNL | 02/07/04
Re: Worse? how  Christian_<>< | 02/07/04

What do you think?

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
Click Here