On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Things You Should Buy at Walmart
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By ZDNet Australia Staff
Posted on ZDNet News: Mar 22, 2004 1:07:00 PM

Network security company ISS is likely to face embarrassing questions from its customers following the discovery of new worm on Saturday that was exploiting flaws in its software.

The worm, dubbed Witty.A, was designed to breach a security hole in the company's widely-used firewall product lineups, such as its BlackICE and RealSecure software series.

Reports from Internet monitoring firms suggest the worm is similar to Blaster, which appeared last August and left a multi-million dollar damage trail for companies to clean up.

Security experts say the worm could cause system crashes as it tampers with local hard drives.

ISS posted an update to patch the hole on its Web site late last week but gave no indication of how long they'd known about the weakness. Witty had infected an estimated 10,000 computers by early Saturday, EDT, and recent reports suggest that number may have increased to around 50,000 in the last 24 to 48 hours.

Unlike recent viruses that have relied on e-mail to spread, Witty requires no human intervention in order to propagate.

Like Blaster, Witty spreads autonomously using its host PC as staging point to snoop around for other vulnerable PCs. However, Witty was designed to target a flaw in software used in ISS software products to examine ICQ traffic. Once it has infected a new machine it runs alongside ISS software and continues the infection cycle.

Security experts are advising ISS firewall customers to patch their software immediately or use it to block UDP port 4000 to close the door on the worm.

The worm picked up its name from what appears to be a signature marking left in it source code by the programmer.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 62 Talkback(s)
This firewal was
supposed to stop the PC viruses and worms. i.e., those
generated from and destined for ms windows.

Goes to show that the innumerable holes in the ms
windows platform make it hard to stop problems even at
the firewall level.

Got it?

-m... (Read the rest)
Posted by: michael-t Posted on: 03/25/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
This is a Microsoft specific ActiveX exploit  jellyclock | 03/22/04
activex?  tooner440 | 03/22/04
For the intellectually challenged and in denial MS apologists  jellyclock | 03/22/04
It's ok to be wrong...  wolf_z | 03/22/04
It's ok to be wrong...  seosamh_z | 03/22/04
chill!  tooner440 | 03/25/04
Actually, not just MS products this time  doctormoriarty | 03/22/04
FROM THE ISS ALERT  pschroeder@... | 03/22/04
I didn't see it in there either  doctormoriarty | 03/22/04
Rush to judgement!  ShadeTree | 03/22/04
NOT MS's fault.  doe_z | 03/22/04
Compelled to respond to the apologists  jellyclock | 03/22/04
The first sign of someone that doesn't know  rock06r | 03/22/04
I may have missed something...  doe_z | 03/22/04
The 'shocking' connection is  jfrankcarr | 03/22/04
This is just jellyclock's MO  pschroeder@... | 03/22/04
left out  pschroeder@... | 03/22/04
my first encounter with jellyclock...  tooner440 | 03/25/04
I think what we have here  PA-ITGuy | 03/22/04
The your whole argument is OT  doctormoriarty | 03/22/04
What part of....  DragonBRockin | 03/23/04
Idiot it's not windows  maniac_z | 03/22/04
ok... let's take a silly analogy for you...  ryusen | 03/22/04
Humble pie - yes, I am eating it  jellyclock | 03/23/04
Maybe this will be the one to get the public stired up  nite_w0lf | 03/22/04
Don't count on it  Squawkbox | 03/22/04
Maybe this will be the one to get the public stired up  seosamh_z | 03/22/04
Won't make a dent.  doe_z | 03/22/04
The sad part  PA-ITGuy | 03/22/04
Patch, patch, patch  doctormoriarty | 03/22/04
Outcry about what?  maniac_z | 03/22/04
Blackice vulnerability  crocd | 03/22/04
Totally irresposible!  bjbrock | 03/22/04
Totally irresposible!  seosamh_z | 03/22/04
Oh my  ddollinger | 03/22/04
Grade school  bjbrock | 03/25/04
Let's not get our ******* in a wad just yet.  Nynviee_Almere@... | 03/22/04
Huh?  maniac_z | 03/22/04
If means if.  bjbrock | 03/25/04
Can't we.........  Dan C._z | 03/22/04
Who Cares?  coffeenite | 03/22/04
Think again!  ShadeTree | 03/22/04
Hard - Soft  SC-man | 03/22/04
Uh ... No ... You're Wrong.  coffeenite | 03/22/04
How am I wrong?  ShadeTree | 03/22/04
The difference...  Patrick Jones | 03/22/04
Also,..  Patrick Jones | 03/22/04
Depends on your definition of what "is" is.  ShadeTree | 03/22/04
I got your point...  Patrick Jones | 03/22/04
PC is a Personal Computer  voska | 03/22/04
Answer ... Get a hardware firewall too  George Jay | 03/22/04
Hardware Firewall????  cchenoweth | 03/22/04
Um..  Patrick Jones | 03/22/04
Other new methods of creating backdoors  toomuchgreeatea@... | 03/22/04
(NT) ... or through firmware updates ...  toomuchgreeatea@... | 03/22/04
Another big village meeting today  Len Rooney | 03/22/04
Reak Secure isn't a firewall  voska | 03/22/04
Another PC HOLE  michael-t | 03/22/04
huh?  eLurker | 03/23/04
cuts both ways  tooner440 | 03/25/04
This firewal was  michael-t | 03/25/04
ISS and activeX  bjbrock | 03/25/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here