On CNET: Canon rolls out PowerShots for spring
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ben Charny
Posted on ZDNet News: Apr 13, 2004 11:29:00 PM

Hoping to contain "skyrocketing" costs, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer has asked the Federal Communications Commission to limit how much U.S. cell phone service providers charge law enforcement to wiretap calls.

After a period of spiking prices, Spitzer's office now spends a budget-busting $400,000 to $500,000 annually on wiretaps, while some smaller law enforcement agencies aren't using the basic crime-fighting tactic at all, according to a document Spitzer filed Monday with the FCC.

"Such a cost-recovery scheme (makes) intercepts prohibitively expensive for virtually all law enforcement agencies, and result in depriving law enforcement of an essential crime-fighting and anti-terror tool," he added.

Cell phone service providers have warned for more than a decade that wiretapping would be an expensive proposition, much more so than traditional phone networks. Furthermore, there are mechanisms in place that allow law enforcement agencies to dispute any wiretapping costs if they feel they are being overcharged, a representative for the Cellular Telecommunications & Internet Association (CTIA), a cell phone industry trade group, said in response to Spitzer's request to the FCC.

According to Spitzer, a yearlong wiretap costs between $5,000 to $26,400, depending on which U.S. cell phone service provider is doing the setup and maintenance. The CTIA representative did not comment on figures Spitzer's office provided.

Spitzer's request is likely to be supported by the FBI, which has complained in the past of the high costs of wiretapping a cell phone call. An FBI representative had no immediate comment.

Spitzer's request was part of a larger FCC filing in support of making present-day wiretap rules apply to broadband providers. The FBI has said it asked for the changes because criminals are now favoring voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), cell phone push-to-talk and other unregulated communications services.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 6 Talkback(s)
so right you are
"Limiting the cost of eaves dropping will only provide incentive to eaves drop for less than valid reasons. "

but is nice to see a bill will be recieved for each wiretap, thus preventing some abuse of the system by people taping people they have no legal right too... (Read the rest)
Posted by: V Sanders Posted on: 04/16/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Wiretap LESS  Mstowelboy2b | 04/13/04
As one of the countriy's founding fathers...  bjbrock | 04/15/04
Pay to play!  kd5auq | 04/14/04
Invading someone's privacy is not cheap!  bjbrock | 04/15/04
so right you are  V Sanders | 04/16/04
how many wiretaps do they plan to do a year  V Sanders | 04/16/04

What do you think?

SmartPlanet

Click Here