On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Things You Should Buy at Walmart
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Robert Lemos
Posted on ZDNet News: May 25, 2004 9:14:00 PM

A security hole still threatens Mac OS X users after a patch issued by Apple Computer last week failed to fix the underlying problem, security experts said on Tuesday.

The security issue could allow an attacker to transfer and then run a malicious program on a Mac, if the Mac's user can be enticed to go to a fake Web page on which the program has been placed.

"This, in my mind, is the first critical vulnerability on OS X," said Richard Forno, a security researcher and the former chief of security for domain registrar Network Solutions. "Downloading the patch and seeing that there were some things that were fixed and some things that weren't, tells me that there is more work to be done."


Get Up to Speed on...
Enterprise security
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


Two other software companies have confirmed the issue. Security information company Secunia raised its rating of the potential risk to "extremely critical" after determining that the vulnerability is more widespread than Apple apparently first thought. Independent software maker Unsanity released a tool this week to work around the problem and put out a white paper describing the issue.

Apple would not comment. The company released the original patch Friday after news of the vulnerability appeared on the Internet.

The vulnerability actually involves two flaws. One allows a Web site to place a file on the Mac's hard drive when a user clicks on a uniform resource locator, or URL, specifically designed to bypass Mac OS X's security. The other gives an attacker the ability to run a file on another user's computer, provided the location of the file is known. Used together, the flaws constitute a major security hole that could result in a potential instant-messaging or e-mail virus.

Perhaps the biggest problem is that there seems to be no easy solution, Jason Harris, a programmer for Unsanity, wrote in the company's white paper.

"There's lots of overlap between useful applications of this functionality and malicious ones, meaning that Apple can't easily fix this without removing useful features from its operating system and from existing apps," he wrote.

The issue is the first major security problem for Mac OS X that has not been caused by the operating system's underlying Unix roots. Previously, Mac OS X has mainly had to patch problems that affected FreeBSD, the Unix-like operating system on which it is based. However, the current issue is in the code that the company built on top of that software.

Forno maintains that the Mac is more secure than Windows but stressed that this problem should have been caught in testing before the operating system had shipped. Moreover, in light of the goofed patch and previous issues with Apple downplaying security problems, he said the company needs to start being more proactive about security.

"Apple is coming to terms with dealing with these types of issues, "Forno said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 64 Talkback(s)
lol
tiger is being 'shown off' june 28 at the developers conference, which makes it a little less vaporous than a microsoft unofficially announced product. so, i still think rule #35 could apply, based on the little snafu they went through when panther was first released.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: eLurker Posted on: 05/26/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
LOL  ITsucks | 05/25/04
Before their trustworthy computing initiative?  doe_z | 05/25/04
and after  Outside T. Box | 05/26/04
The price of increased useability...  toadlife | 05/25/04
so i guess i've know what to think...  joethemacfan | 05/25/04
The Fix  ericortner | 05/25/04
Now there's a timely response!  kiddpeat | 05/26/04
Geeze...  LongShipUser | 05/25/04
I'ts never been exploited,  rkadowns | 05/25/04
I'm not concerned about security...  LongShipUser | 05/25/04
You're safe because you're running Linux?  joseb_z | 05/25/04
Thanks for calling me in that  LongShipUser | 05/26/04
and you know this because...  kiddpeat | 05/26/04
I know this because...  tic swayback | 05/26/04
Browser problem  ryusen | 05/25/04
You are correct...  BitTwiddler | 05/26/04
Now see...  LongShipUser | 05/26/04
Oh I believe you were really shopping for one...  mlindl | 05/26/04
Actually...  LongShipUser | 05/26/04
simple fix  doingdifferent | 05/25/04
Track Records...  ryusen | 05/25/04
Huh?  tic swayback | 05/25/04
What planet did you fall off of???  Da-Man | 05/26/04
Earth, you should visit there some time  tic swayback | 05/26/04
tic  eLurker | 05/26/04
Interesting thought  tic swayback | 05/26/04
continuing the thought  eLurker | 05/26/04
this expalins much:  ryusen | 05/26/04
Got it, thanks  tic swayback | 05/26/04
What turnip truck were you push off of?  bgoss@... | 05/26/04
See-  PA-ITGuy | 05/26/04
I see, but why is this relevant here?  tic swayback | 05/26/04
I may be wrong  PA-ITGuy | 05/26/04
Could be...  tic swayback | 05/26/04
have you read soem of the other recent articles?  ryusen | 05/26/04
does this soudn familiar?  ryusen | 05/25/04
Apple Puts Out Patch That Does Not Work  PottHead | 05/25/04
It Ain't So  tic swayback | 05/26/04
A patch that leaves the hole open does not work fine.  kiddpeat | 05/26/04
Different, but related holes  tic swayback | 05/26/04
They don't have experience MS has...  Xunil_Sierutuf | 05/26/04
Re: They don't have experience MS has...  PottHead | 05/26/04
Then you don't know what the h*kk is  tic swayback | 05/26/04
yeah, this fits the 'troll' description better.  eLurker | 05/26/04
you say tomato  ryusen | 05/26/04
Message has been deleted.  Da-Man | 05/26/04
Kinda scary isn't it?  kiddpeat | 05/26/04
Chickens coming home to roost  drichards1953 | 05/26/04
snooore.....  gorticalius | 05/26/04
Not to mention...  tic swayback | 05/26/04
OS's are Vulnerable...  Da-Man | 05/26/04
At Yet...  MonsterPuppy | 05/26/04
Everything will work out fine  FilledOut | 05/26/04
this is hilarious  kiddpeat | 05/26/04
We're laughing with/at you  tic swayback | 05/26/04
If you were using a PC  PA-ITGuy | 05/26/04
How likely a scenario is this, anyway?  mlindl | 05/26/04
Didn't read it right  PA-ITGuy | 05/26/04
Another story about Macs - iMovie at Cannes  j.m.galvin | 05/26/04
More "Guidelines for Success" from the M$ sales department  toomuchgreeatea@... | 05/26/04
you could  eLurker | 05/26/04
Tiger, Tiger, burning bright  tic swayback | 05/26/04
Duly Noted: Will be added as Rule #51  toomuchgreeatea@... | 05/26/04
lol  eLurker | 05/26/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here