On TV.com: MEL GIBSON Calls TV Reporter a Bad Word
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Graeme Wearden
Posted on ZDNet News: Jun 11, 2004 1:18:00 PM

Pioneering antispam organization The Spamhaus Project has begun receiving threats from spammers, many of whom appear to have moved into the U.K. following the establishment of controversial U.K. laws that ostensibly outlaw the spamming of personal e-mail addresses.

Spamhaus founder Steve Linford revealed told the Openwave messaging anti-abuse conference in London this week that this legislation has had a counterproductive effect. "For the first time we have very tenacious spamming gangs setting up in the U.K.," said Linford. "And, for the first time, we have spammers threatening us with legal action."

Spamhaus tracks spamming operations across the world and operates a blacklist that helps ISPs to block some of the many millions of unsolicited junk e-mails they try and send every day.

Linford explained that spammers are now claiming Spamhaus has no legal right to block them. Their argument, he said, revolves around the claim that the U.K. government has introduced the privacy and electronic communications regulations that explicitly ban some forms of spam--and that because they are acting within this law their activities are explicitly permitted.

When the government introduced the privacy and electronic communications regulations last December, it said they made it an offense for a U.K. company to send junk e-mail or text messages, unless the recipient is an existing customer or has given their permission to receive such material. Firms who flout the law face a £5,000 ($9,100) fine for each breach.

However, this only covered individual e-mail accounts and not corporate ones.

Linford claimed the legislation fails to even protect individuals, because it is so difficult and time-consuming for the authorities to take action. The Information Commissioner's office has already said publicly that it wants stronger powers and recently admitted that it didn't expect to bring any spammers to court this year.

The government, though, has so far refused to make changes to the law. The Department of Trade and Industry recently said it would wait for the legislation to "bed in", a process that is likely to take several months.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 39 Talkback(s)
"setting up in the U.K."--Why not just block the U.K.? NT
aa (Read the rest)
Posted by: caktus Posted on: 06/16/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Poor Spammers  ibabadur1 | 06/11/04
I disagree  James T. Kirk | 06/11/04
Wow!!! Auto-Censoring!!!  James T. Kirk | 06/11/04
Somewhat Off-Topic, but...  Yen_z | 06/11/04
Scumbags  James T. Kirk | 06/11/04
Well, no, actually.  Yen_z | 06/11/04
Louisville Sluggers...  Chris Moller | 06/11/04
Nah.  bhanes@... | 06/11/04
I don't see their point...  MG_z | 06/11/04
Re: I don't see their point...  none none | 06/11/04
Reading for comprehension  Yagotta B. Kidding | 06/11/04
Critical thinking  none none | 06/11/04
Correct - But wrong  tamuhockey | 06/14/04
But why...?  NottaFan | 06/14/04
correct as well  tamuhockey | 06/14/04
People setting up black list don't do the blocking  voska | 06/11/04
Exactly!  Martin Marvinski | 06/11/04
agree 150%  V Sanders | 06/13/04
Must be the 'new' math. NT  caktus | 06/16/04
Another point..  MG_z | 06/11/04
Theft of resources  swoopee | 06/12/04
funny how spammer said consumers  V Sanders | 06/13/04
Anger Management  ibabadur1 | 06/11/04
Human's are violent and like thier violence  voska | 06/11/04
And then...  swoopee | 06/12/04
Violence will get you nowhere  voiceofreason_z | 06/11/04
I'm not violent...  Martin Marvinski | 06/13/04
Good point, but not really necessary  MG_z | 06/11/04
Violence is no laughing matter  clk41 | 06/15/04
I also believe that violence should be limited,  James Dean_z | 06/11/04
Spamhaus doesn't block anything  CobraA1 | 06/11/04
ID10T's  bhanes@... | 06/11/04
but consumers have a right to ask for them to be blocked  V Sanders | 06/13/04
There should be NO spam.  agottschald | 06/14/04
Good in theory, but impossible  tamuhockey | 06/14/04
There is one way to stop better than 99.99% of all spam  agottschald | 06/15/04
Wouldn't work  tamuhockey | 06/15/04
It would make the laws enforceable  Grook | 06/16/04
"setting up in the U.K."--Why not just block the U.K.? NT  caktus | 06/16/04

What do you think?

SmartPlanet

Click Here