On TechRepublic: The 5 worst tech products of 2009
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Will Sturgeon
Posted on ZDNet News: Jun 14, 2004 3:16:00 PM

Computer users' inboxes continue to be littered with threats, nuisances and costly and unwanted e-mails--and there is no sign of this situation easing.

Volumes of spam e-mail are continuing to soar month-on-month and the levels of virus-infected e-mails remain constant and high.

According to figures from e-mail security firm MessageLabs, spam now accounts for around 76 per cent of all e-mail traffic. Mark Sunner, CTO of MessageLabs, described the growth of spam as a "constant upwards curve" which still shows no signs of stopping.

Given that situation it's unsurprising that a separate report from U.S. research firm Nucleus claims the cost of dealing with spam has doubled on last year.

The company claims the average annual cost per employee of dealing with spam is now $1,934--based on interviews with 82 Fortune 500 companies. According to the findings the average employee receives nearly 7,500 spam messages per year--up from 3,500 last year.

Handling this deluge of unsolicited e-mail reportedly costs employees 3.1 per cent of their working day, every year. In monetary terms that work out as £775 ($1,400) wasted for every £25,000 ($45,000) of salary. Across a large organization it will soon add up.

Rebecca Wettemann, VP of research of Nucleus, blamed "weak legislation" for the continuing rise in spam levels. That opinion was backed up by Symantec CEO John Thompson who last week referred to the U.S. Can Spam law as "the stupidest piece of legislation ever passed, anywhere in the world".

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 23 Talkback(s)
Advertiser Pays
As it is generally impossible to track the spam back to the spammer, the only way to stop spam is to penalise the person paying the spammer, ie the advertiser.
Make the advertiser legally liable for the spam and it will dry up overnight.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Gregory.J.Bradley@... Posted on: 07/05/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Symantec CEO needs to get out more...  KOS-MOS | 06/14/04
... time to go bathe my donkeyg  Martin Marvinski | 06/14/04
Is that a squirrel in your pants or are you just happy to see me?  ShadeTree | 06/14/04
Maybe the squirrel is gathering nuts  Mr Conductor | 06/15/04
Because canspam laws will put....  bjb_z | 06/14/04
Then there's enticing bees.  Anton Philidor | 06/14/04
iirc,  ryusen | 06/14/04
Where I live there this law  voska | 06/14/04
RattleSnakes.....  middle of nowhere | 06/15/04
CAN-CAN SPAM  pirkeyw | 06/14/04
You cannot use laws  James T. Kirk | 06/14/04
Spam, Schman. SPYWARE is the real threat right now...  BitTwiddler | 06/14/04
To Can or not to Can-Spam  DragonBRockin | 06/14/04
Completely agree, but how?  tamuhockey | 06/14/04
Not up to me...  DragonBRockin | 06/14/04
There is only one way to reduce spam  Commander_z | 06/14/04
agreed, but people are stupid  tamuhockey | 06/14/04
The amount of intelligence  voska | 06/14/04
Statistical error  Anton Philidor | 06/14/04
That's not how Spam works  voska | 06/14/04
Spam and forged headers  Mopsey | 06/15/04
Join the war effort  G.A.L. | 06/17/04
Advertiser Pays  Gregory.J.Bradley@... | 07/05/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here