On The Insider: Britney's Bikini-Clad Top 10
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Munir Kotadia
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 14, 2004 2:19:00 PM

Security experts are bracing themselves for a spate of new worms and viruses designed to exploit of the seven new vulnerabilities announced by Microsoft on Tuesday as part of its monthly patch cycle.

Of the new vulnerabilities, Windows Shell (MS04-024)--has been picked out by security experts as a potential target for future worms and viruses.

Ben Nagy, senior security engineer at security researcher firm eEye, said he expects the Windows Shell bug to be the most serious threat--despite Microsoft rating the problem as 'important' rather than 'critical'.

According to Microsoft, if a user is vulnerable to MS04-024 and has administrator privileges, an attacker could "take complete control of the affected system, including installing programs; viewing, changing, or deleting data; or creating new accounts with full privileges."

However, the flaw is not rated as critical because it would require "significant user interaction" to work. This means that a user would need to open an e-mail attachment, or download a file from a malicious Web site.

Richard Starnes, president of security industry group ISSA UK, said that malware writers usually reverse-engineer Microsoft's patches in order to produce exploits. Based on his on experience of previous threats, he expects the first batch of new exploit codes to be available as early as next week. These would probably be used to create a worm delivered as an email attachment.

"Given the trend, it will probably take between five and seven days for exploits to start appearing--depending on their complexity. Because it has to be locally executed, it is likely to be another LoveBug scenario," Starnes said.

EEye's Nagy agrees that to exploit the vulnerability, a virus will most likely be distributed as an e-mail attachment, but the vulnerability could also be 'blended' with another attack.

"I don't think either vulnerability could create a Sasser or MSBlast type-worm, but we are seeing many blended threats, so it could be used in combination with other exploits," said Nagy.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 109 Talkback(s)
Infected
Why should you be *infected* since you seem to proclaim you're in the 10% of savvies... (Read the rest)
Posted by: jguyp725@... Posted on: 08/11/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Oh shoot, this was Microsoft's way...  bjbrock | 07/14/04
Paranoia  mojoman_x@... | 07/14/04
So can IE...  BitTwiddler | 07/14/04
So can sticking your head in the sand!  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
'Important' Windows flaw could turn critical  Loverock Davidson | 07/14/04
Hey, you are brilliant, you could help MS with security PR.  DonnieBoy | 07/14/04
Ahhh another embittered Linux user  mojoman_x@... | 07/14/04
I checked out all ... one ..of them.  el1jones | 07/14/04
From the sound of it...  Letophoro | 07/14/04
Nope  Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/14/04
Semantics  Letophoro | 07/14/04
Such as?  Martin Marvinski | 07/14/04
Funny that it was only the Windows...  bjbrock | 07/14/04
Your right  OhMyGosh | 07/14/04
Same hole  Eggs Ackley_z | 07/14/04
you mean...  ryusen | 07/14/04
Could be worse  AmusedAtItAll | 07/14/04
Yes I am  Loverock Davidson | 07/14/04
I didn't know  php_developer | 07/14/04
Possible?  Linux User 147560 | 07/14/04
But when users become more advanced they become more reckless  Michael Kelly | 07/14/04
Get REAL!  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
The kind of novices I mean...  Michael Kelly | 07/14/04
As they say..  d_jedi | 07/14/04
you're missing something...  ryusen | 07/14/04
Actually...  PA-ITGuy | 07/14/04
Also...  tallguy779 | 07/14/04
What?  d_jedi | 07/14/04
BECAUSE THEY ARE TOO STUPID!  jrbeaman | 07/14/04
(nt) That's what autoupdate is for  d_jedi | 07/14/04
Auto update still isn't good enough  Michael Kelly | 07/14/04
Re: Michael  d_jedi | 07/14/04
Infected  jguyp725@... | 08/11/04
You still haven't explained..  d_jedi | 07/14/04
Lousy take on it...  Martin Marvinski | 07/14/04
Idiots  Yagotta B. Kidding | 07/14/04
You just don't get it, do you?  jrbeaman | 07/14/04
I get it  Loverock Davidson | 07/14/04
gave up on you BSD BS?  ryusen | 07/14/04
Nope  Loverock Davidson | 07/14/04
the required "user interaction"  ryusen | 07/14/04
Takes `significant' user interaction to work?  michael-t | 07/14/04
I guess we know which monkey you are.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/14/04
And Stevie was just bragging about progress on security.  DonnieBoy | 07/14/04
Microsoft's whole business is built on FUD  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/14/04
red hat has more flaws look  ITsucks | 07/14/04
So what? This is about Microsoft.  jrbeaman | 07/14/04
microsoft has more flaws look  OhMyGosh | 07/14/04
lol just acting like a linux zealot  ITsucks | 07/14/04
No, he's right. Sorry buddy.  hayesk | 07/14/04
Don't be so hard on the poor guy.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/14/04
Ditto  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
but...  ryusen | 07/14/04
Good point always overlooked  Linux User 147560 | 07/14/04
Now try it in the other direction  Michael Kelly | 07/14/04
Let's take a look...  Linux User 147560 | 07/14/04
His success is only distributing the plague.  jrbeaman | 07/14/04
The problem with that is...  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
No heads?  htotten | 07/14/04
A developer with a conscience...  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
Come On People It is JUST A MINOR FLAW  RobertoSalazar | 07/14/04
THAT'S ALREADY BEEN FIXED nt  PA-ITGuy | 07/14/04
Well, right or wrong, this hurts Microsoft, keeps the bad news rolling.  DonnieBoy | 07/14/04
Fixed by who? The users? HA HA HA!  jrbeaman | 07/14/04
"Minor" flaw???  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
Didn't ppl say no one is reverse engineering patches  FilledOut | 07/14/04
Microsoft should encrypt the patches  d_jedi | 07/14/04
Rubbish...  Mike Cox | 07/14/04
When you finish patching all servers, is it time to patch again?  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/14/04
It's like the old "Dunkin' Donuts" commercial  jfrankcarr | 07/14/04
Gotta be Mike's neighbor to use Windows!  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
Some of us have more important things  tpc944 | 07/14/04
I don't see the humour..  d_jedi | 07/14/04
Hmmmmmmmmmm  North of the 49th | 07/14/04
Great big "ATTABOY!"  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
Ok, is it me or...  BitTwiddler | 07/14/04
Not strange, predictable.  jrbeaman | 07/14/04
Not Really  jion | 07/14/04
Discovered by Mozilla project and patched  Eggs Ackley_z | 07/14/04
Windows Flaw  wtasbury@... | 07/14/04
Wrong people, your plan should ...  jrbeaman | 07/14/04
Yes, just two beheadings should do it  Eggs Ackley_z | 07/14/04
The pleasure center of my brain just tingled.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/14/04
yes of course...  ryusen | 07/14/04
There's something called "passive aggressive"  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
Viruses , trojans -- A "Great" computer experience?  firstmagnitude | 07/14/04
You got the picture.  jrbeaman | 07/14/04
Get out of the rat race  georgep_z | 07/14/04
Amen!  crash89 | 07/14/04
Agreed. Just get away from Windows  hayesk | 07/14/04
Heretic!  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
Did anyone notice?  ryusen | 07/14/04
Virus Writers  kenp@... | 07/14/04
The first couple of them, maybe..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 07/14/04
Re: Virus Writers  Wizard57M | 07/14/04
Another tools used by Homeland Security discovered!!!  toomuchgreeatea@... | 07/14/04
I don't use Outlook Express why do I have to keep patching it?  duclod | 07/14/04
Because  Michael Kelly | 07/14/04
Enterprise analyst, where are you?  Expatriate US Geek | 07/14/04
Must be at MacWorld.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 07/14/04
EXTRA.. EXTRA.. THIS NEWS JUST IN..  FreeBSD | 07/14/04
Bummer. But, no big deal.  marksashton | 07/14/04
Right On Brother!  bunnyman | 07/14/04
One small (okay, maybe big) problem  crash89 | 07/14/04
Really? Describe the "app" that the patches broke.  marksashton | 07/14/04
Here you go  voska | 07/15/04
Could have been shorter...  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
Gotta be a MSFT Evangelical...  Dave Mount | 07/14/04
jfrankcarr, you are right. the danger is the "guy"  what_now2 | 07/14/04

What do you think?

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here