On MovieTome: Top Ten: Most Bizarre Twilight Merch
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Robert Lemos
Posted on ZDNet News: Aug 12, 2004 11:00:00 AM

A year ago, the author of the MSBlast computer worm taunted Microsoft with a message in the fast-spreading program: "billy gates why do you make this possible? Stop making money and fix your software!!"

Bill Gates and company apparently took up the challenge. On Friday, Microsoft released to PC manufacturers Windows XP Service Pack 2, an update aimed at locking down customers' computers. SP2 took more than nine months to complete and contains significant security changes to the flagship operating system.

News.context

What's new:
The release of SP2, Microsoft's security-conscious update to Windows XP, comes a year after the MSBlast worm tormented PC users.

Bottom line:
The update pulls together lessons learned from major attacks on Microsoft software. Whether it will make computers as secure as customers expect it to remains unclear.

More stories on this topic

Microsoft's overhaul of the software underwent a fast shift in direction--from a focus on features to an overwhelming concentration on security--after the rapid spread of MSBlast last summer threw doubt on the operating system's protections.

The worm compromised more than 9.5 million Windows PCs by exploiting a flaw in the software that not many customers had actually patched, even though Microsoft had made a fix available.

"This time last year was a really exciting time," said Amy Carroll, director of product management in Microsoft's Security Business and Technology Unit. "There wasn't a lot of sleep involved."

The MSBlast worm hit the Internet on Aug. 11, 26 days after Microsoft published a patch for the vulnerability that the worm used to spread. But many Windows users failed to vaccinate their systems, even though there was widespread expectation that a virus would emerge from the security hole. The result: The malicious program caused enough havoc to play some part in a major power failure that affected as many as 50 million homes in the United States and Canada, though it did not cause the outage.

A year later, the release of SP2 means that Carroll and her Redmond cohorts may get at least a few hours more winks. Through changes to the Windows XP code and configuration, the update adds better security to the operating system's handling of network data, program memory, browsing activity and e-mail messages.

Hard lessons

Major virus incidents drive Microsoft to kick-start security initiatives.


INCIDENT
July to September 2001: Code Red worm and Nimda virus grab headlines.

RESPONSE
October 2001: Microsoft creates Strategic Technology Protection Program and three months later launches the Trustworthy Computing Initiative.


INCIDENT
January 2003: Slammer spreads using a six-month-old flaw.

RESPONSE
June 2003: Microsoft revamps security updates, focuses on convincing customers to patch their systems and finds other ways to protect unpatched customers.


INCIDENT
August 2003: MSBlast echoes across the Web.

RESPONSE
October 2003: Microsoft changes its next Windows XP service pack to focus on security.

August 2003: Microsoft kicks off a "Protect Your PC" campaign.

October 2003: The software maker starts a fund aimed at rewarding people who help locate and prosecute virus writers.


Source: CNET News.com

Some security companies are tentatively hopeful that the XP software fix will bolster security in the average PC.

"It is probably too early to say whether SP2 will meet its promise," said Alfred Huger, senior director of engineering at Symantec, a security company. "That said, it's a great step in the right direction. We still have all the same fears as before, but we are in a better place to deal with them."

Those that install the update will be better protected against MSBlast-type network worms. The security revamp has multiple layers of redundancy that would have stopped MSBlast and the more recent Sasser worm from spreading, Microsoft's Carroll said.

For example, the flaw in the Remote Procedure Call (RPC) component in Windows that allowed MSBlast to spread has now been fixed, she said. Even if it hadn't, SP2 has an automatic update feature that would have installed the Microsoft patch before MSBlast propagated. Then, if a user turned off that update feature, SP2's improved firewall would have blocked the worm. And if the firewall had been turned off, Microsoft has changed the way that Windows XP interacts with such viruses, so that MSBlast's attempts to infect computers would have failed.

"There is a whole cascade of defenses that make the operating system more resilient overall," Carroll said.

Now Microsoft has to persuade consumers and corporate network administrators to apply the SP2 changes. The company has repeatedly learned that customers are less than assiduous about applying updates to their systems. The Slammer worm, which exploited a 6-month-old security hole in Microsoft SQL Server, spread widely because many companies failed to patch the flaw during that half-year.

"This is the most secure version of Windows that we have shipped yet," said Carroll, who issued a plea for customers to apply the patch. "That said, it is not a 'silver bullet,' and we are doing a lot of other things to address security."

Complicating matters, the update could cause problems with corporate homegrown applications, Microsoft has acknowledged. IBM, for one, has told employees to wait for the go-ahead from management before installing the update. To allow companies time to test how the update will affect their users, Microsoft has published a tool to enable businesses to block people from downloading and installing the update.

Giving companies a choice is one of the lessons learned by Microsoft. A handful of major worm and virus attacks in the past three years have taught the software giant that security is not simple. The result is that the company pushes for security on multiple fronts.


Special coverage
'MSBlast' echoes
across the Net
The Internet worm
exploits a widespread
Windows flaw.


The Code Red and Nimda worms led the company to embark on its 10-year Trustworthy Computing initiative, designed to focus Microsoft employees on building better security into products and on improving customer response. The Slammer worm convinced the software giant to stress patching and to find ways to defend systems that are not patched. And the MSBlast worm helped lead Microsoft to create Service Pack 2 and to finance a reward program for informants who help pinpoint virus writers.

Although it is harder to create network worms that can penetrate Windows XP SP2's defenses, it can be done, Symantec's Huger warned.

"It would stop the old MSBlast. I don't know if it would stop a new one," he said. "This isn't the end of the network worm, but it makes more sense (for attackers) to focus on other methods."

Security researchers are already picking apart SP2, looking for flaws. Thor Larholm, a senior security researcher with PivX Solutions, downloaded the software last Friday and continues to analyze it. The true test for the update will likely come in the next few months, once those researchers' efforts bear fruit.

"Give it a few weeks, or a few months, and you will see the first vulnerability announcements regarding Service Pack 2," Larholm said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 96 Talkback(s)
WinME was horrible and should have been recalled....
I don't have any problems with XP. Are you speaking to your own personal experience or do you have something factual to state?... (Read the rest)
Posted by: JoeMama_z Posted on: 08/16/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
ZDNet, Please run the stories about users having problems with SP2  Xunil_Sierutuf | 08/12/04
Well how many users are having problems, and why?  computer_man | 08/12/04
Haven't found any yet  IT_Critic | 08/12/04
145,000 Google... problems with winxp SP2  Xunil_Sierutuf | 08/12/04
Hmm one question comes to mind...  computer_man | 08/12/04
a better question...  JoeMama_z | 08/12/04
Yep, scary isn't?  computer_man | 08/12/04
I ride the short bus.  Xunil_Sierutuf | 08/12/04
If you figure by Microsoft's numbers  voska | 08/12/04
How old.?. dunno, I ran out of fingers and toes..  Xunil_Sierutuf | 08/12/04
Learn to use google  JimSatterfieldW | 08/12/04
He must be taking Google lessons from BOFH.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/12/04
Keep on posting, it only gets more amusing!  B.O.F.H. | 08/12/04
Ummm how many of those hits are blogs, user groups posts, news stories etc  Squawkbox | 08/12/04
"No problems with WinXP SP 2" 145,000 Times? Great!  Anton Philidor | 08/12/04
So you wanna have a google war eh?  toadlife | 08/16/04
ooohh...Bad Developers!  nomorems | 08/12/04
Bad devlopers are windows biggest problem  Suicida| | 08/12/04
So far all is "ok"  Pinkerton | 08/13/04
test  Bill_gates_Is_SATAN | 08/15/04
I want to here about Doom3 install problems!  Nullifidian | 08/12/04
what about competitor firewall problems  V Sanders | 08/12/04
Read the review linked on the News page.  Anton Philidor | 08/12/04
I had issutes with doom3  Suicida| | 08/12/04
what about UT?  Bill_gates_Is_SATAN | 08/14/04
Why the big hullabaloo?  Sam Fransisco | 08/12/04
EULA  IT_Critic | 08/12/04
This was not a security patch  V Sanders | 08/12/04
I disagree  Suicida| | 08/12/04
huh?  V Sanders | 08/14/04
Car analogy revisited.......  GregSalts | 08/12/04
Poor journalism  mikecel | 08/12/04
Actually, outright falsehood.  Anton Philidor | 08/12/04
Truth no longer matters in journalism  tic swayback | 08/12/04
Good point amid the dross  Anton Philidor | 08/12/04
ISP level user-configurable firewall.  rk_z | 08/12/04
how about  Suicida| | 08/12/04
Cheap for ISP if web page controls firewall.  rk_z | 08/13/04
Can't fix the biggest vulnerability  rpmyers1 | 08/12/04
That would be the "Flawed by Design" category  Xunil_Sierutuf | 08/12/04
Stupid developers too  voska | 08/12/04
Where have we heard this before?  IT_Critic | 08/12/04
wasn't it true?  JoeMama_z | 08/12/04
Actually Win2000 is more secure  Jeff Spicoli | 08/12/04
PB  PB_z | 08/12/04
The question is do YOU know what you are talking about?  Jeff Spicoli | 08/12/04
how so?  JoeMama_z | 08/12/04
win2000 is way more secure  V Sanders | 08/12/04
how so?  JoeMama_z | 08/12/04
More secure and stable  V Sanders | 08/14/04
WinME was horrible and should have been recalled....  JoeMama_z | 08/16/04
And the non-Windows users still whine.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/12/04
Of course they're whining!  PmAc_z | 08/12/04
There's a lot more to Linux than just security  Michael Kelly | 08/12/04
FIne points  FilledOut | 08/12/04
XPs biggest proble is product activation  voska | 08/12/04
Guess I avoided the acitivation mess  FilledOut | 08/12/04
Laptops  nomorems | 08/12/04
Ok that means he has OEM version of XP  computer_man | 08/12/04
Huh?  Anton Philidor | 08/12/04
Replay to Antoni.  computer_man | 08/12/04
wrong key buddy  Suicida| | 08/12/04
on hardware changes and activation  Michael L Hereid Sr | 08/14/04
..and you can keep it  seosamh_z | 08/12/04
responses  Michael Kelly | 08/12/04
What about the platform ?  Suicida| | 08/12/04
NWOR  Jeff Spicoli | 08/12/04
What is NWOR?  GregSalts | 08/12/04
Not Worthy Of Reply (NT)  Anton Philidor | 08/12/04
In the case of Ax and Jeffreeeee NWOR is appropriate alot  Squawkbox | 08/12/04
I'll admit...  Michael Kelly | 08/12/04
Gotta agree  FilledOut | 08/12/04
They are closet Windows users.  voska | 08/12/04
... who don't use XP because ...  Anton Philidor | 08/12/04
Ding Ding!!!  Linux User 147560 | 08/12/04
Very true  Michael Kelly | 08/12/04
I use both  Suicida| | 08/12/04
Hello...  Linux User 147560 | 08/12/04
Greetings . . .  FilledOut | 08/12/04
No_Ax, once again you bow to Gates with no logic in your statement  itanalyst | 08/12/04
Your point would go a lot farther...  Michael Kelly | 08/12/04
Good point...  itanalyst | 08/12/04
And you just prove that AX was right.  computer_man | 08/12/04
Gee...  PA-ITGuy | 08/12/04
Breaking the rules No Ax  tic swayback | 08/12/04
How 'bout the W2K users?  Robert Crocker | 08/13/04
Short answer Robert .........nothing  Squawkbox | 08/13/04
Insidious anti- Microsoft propaganda by ZDNet  Anton Philidor | 08/12/04
I think they need to move beyond being reactionary  Michael Kelly | 08/12/04
Security essential, but does not encourage sales  Anton Philidor | 08/12/04
That depends on the situation  Michael Kelly | 08/12/04
Misleading Statements Make Author Look Dishonest  GregSalts | 08/12/04
For a good balanced analysis of SP2 check out the Reg  marksashton | 08/12/04
It's a favorable review, with good reasons for approval  Anton Philidor | 08/12/04
"harder", but not "impossible"  Jomo_z | 08/14/04
XP SP2 at universities  richwig | 08/16/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline