On The Insider: Sheryl Crow Heads to Cougar Town
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Declan McCullagh
Posted on ZDNet News: Aug 16, 2004 1:13:00 PM

COMMENTARY--Jeffrey Lee Parson pleaded guilty last week to unleashing part of the MSBlast worm attack that wreaked havoc on the Internet a year ago. He got off easy.

Federal prosecutors predictably touted Parson's guilty plea as an example for other would-be vandals. John McKay, the U.S. Attorney for Seattle, proclaimed: "The damage to individual computer users is very real, and the penalties are also very real."

Not really. McKay neglected to mention that Parson's all-expense-paid visit to Club Fed will be surprisingly brief. Prosecutors say that the deal they cut means that Parson, who is 19 years old, will be sentenced to between 18 and 37 months.

That's mild punishment for someone who admitted to inserting nasty features into the original version of MSBlast to make it more noxious. By releasing his "MSBlast.B" variant that took advantage of a bug in Microsoft Windows, Parson intentionally harmed tens of thousands of people for his own amusement.

Parson could be serving more time if he had simply stolen a neighbor's car on a whim.
Compare Parson's sentence with the far stiffer penalties that the government metes out to marijuana "criminals," who harm nobody and cause no property damage. For the 2001 fiscal year, the average sentence for a marijuana offense was 38 months in prison, according to the Office of National Drug Control Policy.

Parson could be serving more time if he had simply stolen a neighbor's car on a whim. The average federal sentence for motor vehicle theft in 2000 was 28 months, the U.S. Justice Department reports. Aggravated assault is punished with an average sentence of 33 months.

If prosecutors took real computer crimes seriously, might that deter future worm attacks? Consider that federal law says the maximum penalty for the offenses listed in Parson's arrest warrant is at least 30 years.

Few caught, fewer go to prison
Light sentences for worm and virus writers is hardly a new phenomenon. In 1988, a Cornell University graduate student named Robert T. Morris released the first Internet worm--and was eventually sentenced to three years' probation, 400 hours of community service and a $10,000 fine.

Light sentences for worm and virus writers is hardly a new phenomenon.
Morris probably didn't deserve a harsher sentence. He never meant for his worm to spread so quickly that it became a worldwide menace (a programming error, not malice, made that happen). Today's generation of so-called script kiddies have no excuse: Their handiwork is carefully crafted to be both disruptive and destructive.

David L. Smith, who created the Melissa virus, which clogged the Internet in 1999, was sentenced in 2002 to 20 months in prison and a $5,000 fine. Jan de Wit, the 20-year-old living in the Netherlands who wrote the Anna Kournikova virus, received only 150 hours of community service--and no jail time.

Better deterrence is especially important because the FBI and other police agencies have such a poor record of identifying the virus and worm writers that infest the Internet's underbelly.

The FBI and its counterparts have failed to convict anyone for a slew of viruses and worms, including Code Red, Nimda, SirCam, Klez, Sobig and Nachi. Police failed to identify the author of the Slammer worm, which threw some bank ATMs offline and knocked out a PC network at a nuclear power plant in Ohio. (A $5 million reward fund created by Microsoft has had better luck, nabbing a Sasser suspect in May.)

You might expect criminals who intentionally infect tens of thousands of computers to be treated at least as harshly as environmental scofflaws. An example: In 1999, the plant manager at LCP Chemicals of Brunswick, Ga., was sentenced to six and a half years in prison for illegally releasing mercury and chlorine into a nearby creek. The chairman of LCP Chemicals' parent company received a nine-year prison sentence.

Worms and viruses pollute today's Internet and cost society far more to clean up than LCP Chemicals' toxic release. So why do their creators get off easier?

biography
Declan McCullagh is CNET News.com's Washington, D.C., correspondent. He chronicles the busy intersection between technology and politics. Before that, he worked for several years as Washington bureau chief for Wired News. He has also worked as a reporter for The Netly News, Time magazine and HotWired.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 78 Talkback(s)
lets see if the wcom and enron execs get a even lighter sentance
"who is 19 years old, will be sentenced to between 18 and 37 months. That's mild punishment"

i bet they do even less time, and cause way way more damage then this teenager ever will... (Read the rest)
Posted by: V Sanders Posted on: 08/21/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
You want an answer? Direct costs not proven  voiceofreason_z | 08/16/04
Special case  StorageGuru | 08/16/04
A little extreme  voska | 08/16/04
Needs to be more harsh  tamuhockey | 08/16/04
(nt) Good analogy, and I agree completely  d_jedi | 08/16/04
But these guys are dangerous.  enduser_z | 08/16/04
No way of proving damages.  voska | 08/16/04
I can give you a direct cost amount  pconroy@... | 08/17/04
Send 'em all to prison for at least 10 years !  realitycheck101 | 08/16/04
And include Microsoft's employees  Oscar_Goldman | 08/16/04
Always blame the victim!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/16/04
Not quite right, but close  voska | 08/16/04
You are of course right.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/16/04
How does that benifit me?  voska | 08/16/04
multi-million dollar fine, distributed to victims of the virus..  d_jedi | 08/16/04
Perhaps if ZDNet (press) didn't make heros of them..  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/16/04
If a victim provokes a criminal to attack - ...  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
bad analogy, don't be an idiot.  tamuhockey | 08/16/04
Read the law and then take a look in the mirror (NT)  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
I am familiar with the law, I do work at a LAW FIRM, do you?  tamuhockey | 08/16/04
Do you know what people can do with insured properties? (NT)  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
Yes I know  tamuhockey | 08/16/04
Thus, you proved Bill Gates is guilty too. That?s it. (NT)  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
Please explain this  tamuhockey | 08/16/04
OK. I will try to simplify it.  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
Now I get it  tamuhockey | 08/16/04
You did not get it again - ...  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
Locks  voska | 08/16/04
If you have MS Windows then ...  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
insurance fraud or something else  TokyoPete | 08/20/04
I disagree on a small point.  enduser_z | 08/16/04
Fortunately that guys like you do not write laws.  Vily Clay | 08/17/04
attractive nuisances laws  jmetz@... | 08/17/04
Bill Gates is a very lucky man that he has so many guys ...  Vily Clay | 08/17/04
Bill Gates is a very lucky man....  TokyoPete | 08/20/04
Wrong, Still guilty  voska | 08/16/04
Don't think so  seosamh_z | 08/17/04
Wrong but....  TokyoPete | 08/20/04
WRONG  d_jedi | 08/16/04
Guys, you just never have had impact with our funny laws.  Vily Clay | 08/16/04
No proof?  d_jedi | 08/17/04
entrapment  tamuhockey | 08/17/04
?I forgot to close my door? case and mafia.  Vily Clay | 08/17/04
No you moron  tamuhockey | 08/17/04
Is the primary use of your head for decoration or diarrhea of words?  Vily Clay | 08/17/04
P.S. I only wish that criminals would be as ?smart? as you. (NT)  Vily Clay | 08/17/04
I think it is a valid sentence.  doe_z | 08/16/04
Why not?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/16/04
Dude, what kind of analogy is that?  doe_z | 08/16/04
No, it only takes one match.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/16/04
True...  doe_z | 08/16/04
Depends  tamuhockey | 08/16/04
Bad example.  doe_z | 08/16/04
points well made  tamuhockey | 08/16/04
Huh??  voska | 08/16/04
Perhaps you will like this analogy better.  enduser_z | 08/16/04
But the "writer" didn't do it...  doe_z | 08/16/04
not correct analogy either  tamuhockey | 08/17/04
but the writer didn't do it...  TokyoPete | 08/20/04
Blame the Victim  John L. Ries | 08/19/04
Missing the point  spidalack | 08/16/04
CIVILY liable, not criminally  tamuhockey | 08/16/04
Civily Liable?  avid_z | 08/18/04
Civl liability  TokyoPete | 08/20/04
PULEASE, NO MORE HORRIBLE CAR ANALOGIES!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 08/16/04
(nt) Agreed  d_jedi | 08/16/04
lets compare it to sick people that go to work  V Sanders | 08/18/04
Pulease....  TokyoPete | 08/20/04
More Than Single Side To Two Of Both Ends  ParadigmOdyssey | 08/16/04
It is perfectly legal to write viruses....  vinyl1 | 08/16/04
So What Else is NEW!!!!!  donger3 | 08/17/04
Jail Sentance  jimjohnd@... | 08/17/04
Boy - you is a funny guy...  quietLee | 08/17/04
The definition of ....  avid_z | 08/18/04
I am more concenered with SPYWARE  V Sanders | 08/18/04
Hard Time, You Bet  ValFitzAndrew | 08/20/04
Source of Malicious Code  ValFitzAndrew | 08/20/04
lets see if the wcom and enron execs get a even lighter sentance  V Sanders | 08/21/04

What do you think?

SmartPlanet

Click Here