On mySimon: Meguiar's Gold Class Premium Car Wax
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Dan Ilett
Posted on ZDNet News: Feb 2, 2005 7:25:00 PM

Spam levels are about to skyrocket, according to experts who warned this week that spammers have developed a new way of delivering their wares.

According to the Spamhaus Project--a U.K.-based antispam compiler of blacklists that block 8 billion messages a day--a new piece of malicious software has been created that takes over a PC. This "zombie" computer is then used to send spam via the mail server of that PC's Internet service provider. This means the junk mail appears to come from the ISP, making it very hard for an antispam blacklist to block it.

Previously, zombie PCs have been used as mail servers themselves, sending spam e-mails directly to recipients.

"The Trojan is able to order proxies to send spam upstream to the ISP," said Steve Linford, director of Spamhaus.

Linford believes that this Trojan horse was created by the same people who write spamming software.

ISPs in the United States may have already been hit. "We've seen a surge in spam coming from major ISPs. Now all of the ISPs are having large amounts of spam going out from their mail servers," Linford said.

This will cause serious problems for the e-mail infrastructure, as it is impractical to block mail with domain names from large ISPs. Linford predicts that ISPs will see a growth in the volume of bulk mail they send and receive over the next two months, with spam levels rising from 75 percent of all e-mail to around 95 percent within a year.

"The e-mail infrastructure is beginning to fail," Linford warned. "You'll see huge delays in e-mail and servers collapsing. It's the beginning of the e-mail meltdown."

Linford said that ISPs need to act fast to take control of the problem. "They've got to throttle the number of e-mails coming from ADSL accounts. They are going to have to act quickly to clean incoming viruses. ISPs have so much spam--they are too understaffed to call people up and tell them they have Trojans on their machines. And no one would know what you're talking about."

Antispam company MessageLabs confirmed Linford's findings.

"This ups the ante in the need for filters," said Mark Sunner, chief technology officer for MessageLabs. "It makes it more difficult for people who compile blacklists, which is why spammers are doing this. It will put more pressure on ISPs to take greater interest in the traffic they carry and filter at source."

The Information Commissioner's Office, the United Kingdom's point-of-call to report spam, said it had received no complaints of bulk spam from ISPs.

Some U.S.-based ISPs contacted by News.com said an e-mail meltdown has yet to arrive. But technicians at some of the largest Internet providers have acknowledged the issue and similar exploits in the past. Many, but not all, U.S. ISPs have blocked open relay ports, such as port 25, to shut out spammers from disseminating messages from home-operated servers. The block has helped some broadband ISPs limit the output of zombie spam, and some have noticed the new form of malware taking shape.

Time Warner Cable, the nation's second largest cable company, said it had become aware of this spam "vector," as it calls it, and has mechanisms to control it, according to company spokesman Keith Cocozza. He noted that the company's ISP, called Road Runner, has outgoing e-mail limits in place, but declined to elaborate on how the company monitors and responds to this malware issue.

Earthlink, which runs a dial-up and broadband service, said it noticed a gradual increase in spam volume coming from its legitimate mail servers since the beginning of 2004. The company claims it has implemented safeguards, such as authenticated SMTP servers and re-routing of legitimate e-mail, to cut down the flow.

"Overall we've been able to greatly reduce the amount of spam from our network by routing activities and applying chokepoints," said Trip Cox, Earthlink's chief technology officer. Cox added that the measure have reduced spam from 30 percent of the ISP's total e-mail volume to 2 percent.

Dan Ilett of ZDNet UK reported from London.

Spam levels are about to skyrocket, according to experts who warned this week that spammers have developed a new way of delivering their wares.

According to the Spamhaus Project--a U.K.-based antispam compiler of blacklists that block 8 billion messages a day--a new piece of malicious software has been created that takes over a PC. This "zombie" computer is then used to send spam via the mail server of that PC's Internet service provider. This means the junk mail appears to come from the ISP, making it very hard for an antispam blacklist to block it.

Previously, zombie PCs have been used as mail servers themselves, sending spam e-mails directly to recipients.

"The Trojan is able to order proxies to send spam upstream to the ISP," said Steve Linford, director of Spamhaus.

Linford believes that this Trojan horse was created by the same people who write spamming software.

ISPs in the United States may have already been hit. "We've seen a surge in spam coming from major ISPs. Now all of the ISPs are having large amounts of spam going out from their mail servers," Linford said.

This will cause serious problems for the e-mail infrastructure, as it is impractical to block mail with domain names from large ISPs. Linford predicts that ISPs will see a growth in the volume of bulk mail they send and receive over the next two months, with spam levels rising from 75 percent of all e-mail to around 95 percent within a year.

"The e-mail infrastructure is beginning to fail," Linford warned. "You'll see huge delays in e-mail and servers collapsing. It's the beginning of the e-mail meltdown."

Linford said that ISPs need to act fast to take control of the problem. "They've got to throttle the number of e-mails coming from ADSL accounts. They are going to have to act quickly to clean incoming viruses. ISPs have so much spam--they are too understaffed to call people up and tell them they have Trojans on their machines. And no one would know what you're talking about."

Antispam company MessageLabs confirmed Linford's findings.

"This ups the ante in the need for filters," said Mark Sunner, chief technology officer for MessageLabs. "It makes it more difficult for people who compile blacklists, which is why spammers are doing this. It will put more pressure on ISPs to take greater interest in the traffic they carry and filter at source."

The Information Commissioner's Office, the United Kingdom's point-of-call to report spam, said it had received no complaints of bulk spam from ISPs.

Some U.S.-based ISPs contacted by News.com said an e-mail meltdown has yet to arrive. But technicians at some of the largest Internet providers have acknowledged the issue and similar exploits in the past. Many, but not all, U.S. ISPs have blocked open relay ports, such as port 25, to shut out spammers from disseminating messages from home-operated servers. The block has helped some broadband ISPs limit the output of zombie spam, and some have noticed the new form of malware taking shape.

Time Warner Cable, the nation's second largest cable company, said it had become aware of this spam "vector," as it calls it, and has mechanisms to control it, according to company spokesman Keith Cocozza. He noted that the company's ISP, called Road Runner, has outgoing e-mail limits in place, but declined to elaborate on how the company monitors and responds to this malware issue.

Earthlink, which runs a dial-up and broadband service, said it noticed a gradual increase in spam volume coming from its legitimate mail servers since the beginning of 2004. The company claims it has implemented safeguards, such as authenticated SMTP servers and re-routing of legitimate e-mail, to cut down the flow.

"Overall we've been able to greatly reduce the amount of spam from our network by routing activities and applying chokepoints," said Trip Cox, Earthlink's chief technology officer. Cox added that the measure have reduced spam from 30 percent of the ISP's total e-mail volume to 2 percent.

Dan Ilett of ZDNet UK reported from London.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 256 Talkback(s)
If only it were that simple
It may be shocking, but there are things besides money that motivate people to send spam. Just this morning, for example, I got an email from some guy in Pakistan talking about how Osama Bin Laden wa... (Read the rest)
Posted by: corticus Posted on: 12/23/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
And, Of Course, It Will Take Advantage Of Microsuck Exchange....  itanalyst | 02/02/05
i know i shouldn't feed the trolls...  Confused by religion | 02/02/05
OUCH!  George Mitchell | 02/02/05
Sorry about that but...  Confused by religion | 02/02/05
Time Warner RR  Nullifidian | 02/02/05
Yes, Time Warner tried using AOL mail  Confused by religion | 02/02/05
Reread the article  gfeier | 02/02/05
No, YOU reread...  dougpierson@... | 02/03/05
RE "i know i shouldn't feed the trolls..."  ajapierce | 02/02/05
WRONG  JimSatterfieldW | 02/03/05
Not really a "problem".... just a deserved frame of mind  shawkins | 02/04/05
If you were able to comprehend what you read...  PA-ITGuy | 02/02/05
PROBLEM SOLVED there are ways to limit spam on an SMTP server  hipparchus2000 | 02/02/05
Problem Solved?  DonEChandler | 02/02/05
We're responsible but we still get complaints  radioleft | 02/02/05
We need more posters like you.  Real World | 02/03/05
Exactly  eulagree | 02/23/05
Perhaps it time to kill the messanger.  shorea50 | 02/03/05
Could be a blessing in disguise  Roger Ramjet | 02/02/05
Right on!  George Mitchell | 02/02/05
Who gets hurt?  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
our customers dont complain... much.  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
How do you help them  greenjavlin | 03/16/05
would make them realise their Windows machine is spamming people  hipparchus2000 | 02/02/05
Who cares?  George Mitchell | 02/03/05
The problem with that analogy.  Joel R | 02/03/05
Um, because it isn't the subscriber's fault?  bill@... | 02/02/05
cant blame the user?  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
no, it's the OS writer's fault  hipparchus2000 | 02/02/05
I disagree  TechType | 02/03/05
Not everyone is  greenjavlin | 03/16/05
that already happens...  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
It is SO EASY  Roger Ramjet | 02/03/05
Technically easy, but potential for problems  bobmcm_z | 03/15/05
Could be a blessing in disguise  cubmiester | 02/03/05
Message to ITANALYST!  ShadeTree | 02/02/05
Dude, get a clue  Oscar_Goldman | 02/02/05
Trojans have afflicted Linux.  ShadeTree | 02/02/05
A couple of things  Roger Ramjet | 02/02/05
worms, trojans  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
Since you didn't read it correctly the first time!  ShadeTree | 02/02/05
difference?  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
hmmmm  JoeMama_z | 02/02/05
Reread the story again  ShadeTree | 02/02/05
compromise  hawkeye_z | 02/02/05
blame  SC-man | 02/02/05
Pathetic analogy.  PA-ITGuy | 02/02/05
Interesting  SC-man | 02/04/05
the police always blame the victim  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
Damn Trojans!  NonZealot | 02/02/05
One Good Thing About Trojans....  itanalyst | 02/02/05
zombie trick- so what  kwazai | 02/02/05
Missed the point  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
authenticated smtp  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
So...?  Jomo_z | 02/03/05
The answer is x509 / mail signing.  kensys | 02/02/05
In a perfect world,  alterego_z | 02/02/05
perfect world  SC-man | 02/02/05
Perfect World  Joel R | 02/03/05
It's A Wonderful World...  SC-man | 02/04/05
You missed the point, or are just being cynical  kensys | 02/02/05
authenticated smtp  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
re: authenticated smtp  kensys | 02/03/05
simpler solution  hipparchus2000 | 02/02/05
Don't buy anything from a spammer  tssywfb | 02/02/05
This would help  radioleft | 02/02/05
Makes no difference....  Jomo_z | 02/03/05
hit the root  Castanet | 02/02/05
Fines  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
that isnt the point...  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
Except its not illegal  shorea50 | 02/03/05
Islamic Justice  Dr_Zinj | 02/02/05
Islamic Justice revisited  raelalt | 02/02/05
Good idea - mutilate the "Normal"  JED! | 02/02/05
Islamic Justice....YES  mailander | 02/10/05
Spam  toddmartin@... | 02/02/05
you're ooouuuuttt.  Bananna | 02/02/05
posters analogy  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
The Way To Stop Spam  rtemlakdds@... | 02/02/05
better idea....  Nullifidian | 02/02/05
Clueless people  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
it dont even matter if you dont...  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
It won't help  wresnick | 02/02/05
Quicker method  Gregory.J.Bradley@... | 02/04/05
SPAM  donreis | 02/02/05
It's the ISP's own fault - New "Port 25" Rules  nottheusual1 | 02/02/05
Opt-out  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
has anyone really tried this?  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
Even a one-time Opt-Out?  Joel R | 02/03/05
the standards were made in the infancy  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
This isn't a Knowledge Thing........ geez  nottheusual1 | 02/03/05
Catch-22 situation there.  Joel R | 02/03/05
a solution  gk@... | 02/02/05
Regulating spammers  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
Take away their funding!  dulljr | 02/02/05
ive always said this  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
What would happen if:  trm1945 | 02/02/05
nice.  Bananna | 02/02/05
Spam them back: AUTOANSWER.exe  tom123_z | 02/02/05
So Ignorant....  mcrute | 02/02/05
Spam the spammers  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
Yes, but it will cost them to developp such a filter  tom123_z | 02/02/05
how about...  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
They want couple of Credit card no.s everyday. That's all.  vaaah | 02/02/05
Pay for each mail  tom123_z | 02/02/05
Secure a PC  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
keep the internet free.  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
Paying For It  ks-art@... | 02/02/05
No redeeming value to pay for mail  jswilsonx | 02/02/05
besides  linuxoverwindows | 02/02/05
some people still buy from spam adverts  hipparchus2000 | 02/02/05
Pay for each email  Twisted Fish | 02/04/05
Let's see how Bayesian filtering and rulesets will handle this  bill@... | 02/02/05
More effective  agottschald | 02/02/05
That's Exactly What I've Done!  bill@... | 02/02/05
Community filtering works better for me  radioleft | 02/02/05
This Is The Premise Behind Razor & DCC  bill@... | 02/03/05
Class Action Sue?  oatmeal | 02/02/05
Spam them back: AUTOANSWER.exe  tom123_z | 02/02/05
And what if the sender's address is spoofed? (NT)  PA-ITGuy | 02/02/05
99.9 percent of spam "senders" are spoofed.  G.A.L. | 02/03/05
Allow the ISP's to charge for delivering the spam  dclark@... | 02/02/05
No, no, no!  radioleft | 02/02/05
Well that could work too...  G.A.L. | 02/03/05
who will pay  bonedaddy29 | 02/03/05
I told you so  BaltimoreBarry | 02/02/05
Years?  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
More years  VolcanoDan | 02/02/05
I agree  FlatAffect | 02/02/05
XXX tld  radioleft | 02/02/05
Are Your Reading the Same Article I Am?  bill@... | 02/02/05
"The e-mail infrastructure is beginning to fail,"  BitTwiddler | 02/02/05
My hosted server uses exim and spamassassin  hipparchus2000 | 02/02/05
Yeah, same here...  bill@... | 02/02/05
Won't work.  Joel R | 02/03/05
Not with today's users...  wordmaster1 | 02/02/05
wrong end  jw122739@... | 02/02/05
wrong end  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
Well, YOU get it...  bill@... | 02/02/05
Message has been deleted.  radioleft | 02/02/05
Fine the spammers and ISPs; make users pay a bond  allen_n | 02/02/05
Doesn't solve the problem  Middle of the Road | 02/02/05
Sorry, you're wrong...  bill@... | 02/02/05
How do ISPs distuinguish by volume?  G.A.L. | 02/03/05
IT slackers  jneedhamp | 02/02/05
Spam  spanky47 | 02/02/05
They are criminals  WDS_z | 02/02/05
Totally defective products  gberke | 02/02/05
Stop Spam NOW. Publicly execute known spammers  adamjr1968 | 02/02/05
I like it  radioleft | 02/02/05
Bring back the public stocks.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
ISPs don't filter .. for (bad) reason  johns_z | 02/02/05
Paying in cycles  Bob43 | 02/02/05
stupid thread  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Are Spammers Idiots or A**holes??  Ludovit | 02/02/05
They're A$$ holes  radioleft | 02/02/05
Yes  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Here's How To Stop It  G T Baker | 02/02/05
Not Bad, but ...  Ludovit | 02/02/05
Another thought  Ludovit | 02/02/05
How's that any different?  bill@... | 02/02/05
Another LAME idea.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
This does work ( try Mailwasher)  G.A.L. | 02/03/05
Sure, it works, but...  bill@... | 02/03/05
The Protocol is the Problem!  kbeartxzd | 02/02/05
Best Solution  mcrute | 02/02/05
Another LAME one  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Spam $ee's  dfsr1 | 02/02/05
old country solution  salvatore_z | 02/02/05
Message has been deleted.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Not a new trick  kokuryu | 02/02/05
Great 1 out of 15 million desinations stopped.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
I agree with dgk TAKE AWAY THEIR FUNDING!!!  dulljr | 02/02/05
Yeah, stop killing the messenger, fine the product.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Works in a country with legal recourse but...  G.A.L. | 02/03/05
Zombie trick  andyjj1 | 02/02/05
And your solution is?????????  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
zombie  redcoat_z | 02/02/05
Yes they are affecting many nntp groups too.  agottschald | 02/02/05
That's not new, where you been?  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Boycott SPAM  Norrfinn | 02/02/05
That won't work  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Fine the one that receives the MONEY  robert@... | 02/02/05
Just what we need, more law breakers.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Automatically block Spam  jswilsonx | 02/02/05
They already do that and clog the internet more  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Each email should be tagged with originating IP.  agent469@... | 02/02/05
No, Just block the spam outgoing.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Each email should be tagged with originating IP  ginseng37 | 02/03/05
No the point is:  agottschald | 02/02/05
have you graduated from grammer school yet?  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
punishment for spammers  dmreed | 02/02/05
Wrong. You can't fight anything from the supply side.  bjbrock | 02/02/05
Some intellegent postings...  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
BLOCKING  earle_z | 02/03/05
Adult Spam  shel10_z | 02/02/05
Thats why individual filtering doesnt help.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
FILTER  earle_z | 02/03/05
The whole Internet is on the brink of failure.  bjbrock | 02/02/05
Message has been deleted.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Ignorance to the real problem: OUR RECKLESSNESS!  swgoldwire | 02/04/05
Ending Spam is Easy.  hyrum@... | 02/02/05
It's that easy?  rrascal | 02/02/05
Yeah, mine says her D|C# is big enough too.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
It always will.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
AMEN !  earle_z | 02/03/05
Zombie SPAM  mrmarvingc | 02/02/05
They dont need dummies, thay already have them  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Isn't it a virus?  COCA-COLA KID | 02/02/05
The problem is  radioleft | 02/02/05
DUH!  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Hunt them down like rabid animals and..........  sleepin'dawg | 02/02/05
Yeah hog our bandwidth with DOS attacks....  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
It is NOT the spammers fault.  generalphysics@... | 02/02/05
NOT the spammers fault ?  earle_z | 02/03/05
Only Solution : Stronger SMTP - POP Server communication!  vaaah | 02/02/05
Nuclear Bombs can kill ants too  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
governments+companies+people+ISPs+technology  JaakT | 02/02/05
Dumb question  FlatAffect | 02/02/05
And once we do that...  radioleft | 02/02/05
You can't, if you are a newbee.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Here's a compromise solution to the zombie problem  radioleft | 02/02/05
Too bad no one requires this.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
We have installed white lists and ... are happy !  WhiteSand | 02/02/05
"Gray Zone"? What's that?  radioleft | 02/02/05
And the rest of the ignorant people?  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Off topic!!  radioleft | 02/02/05
"This" what?  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Linux vs Windows  radioleft | 02/03/05
YES, to all your questions.  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Recent email about spam & spyware  raypoth | 02/03/05
And you don't have a spyware blocker?  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
Of course it will... STUPID!  JohnBeaman | 02/03/05
A General Wake Up Call for Newbies and the Ignorant  swgoldwire | 02/04/05
Pay no attention to the man in the right wing  tekless | 02/03/05
CAN WE STOP SPAM?  USANH | 02/03/05
Spam Overload!  MrSteveO | 02/03/05
Foolish retaliation  sponia | 02/03/05
Easy - just block the entire address block  CobraA1 | 02/03/05
preventing spam  Roynic66212 | 02/03/05
Suggestion for ISP's  WildcatRay | 02/03/05
Responsibility  osreinstall | 02/03/05
How 'bout this...  Queue | 02/03/05
Stopping spammers  starman_gary | 02/03/05
Stop Spam for good  gregry | 02/03/05
Use Better Server Software!  DudeMaster | 02/03/05
PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IS OURS  earle_z | 02/03/05
Wonderful Suggesstion!!  swgoldwire | 02/04/05
Re: PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY IS OURS  Uncle Buck | 02/04/05
End spam overnight  Gregory.J.Bradley@... | 02/04/05
Recklessness to make fast bucks!!  swgoldwire | 02/04/05
Spam  willsmith@... | 02/04/05
Spammers summed up.  crashoverride | 02/04/05
Solution to viruses and other malware  zimjones | 02/21/05
Push the costs back onto the spammers  scaramouche | 07/12/05
If only it were that simple  corticus | 12/23/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline