On TechRepublic: Male bashing in the workplace
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Alorie Gilbert
Posted on ZDNet News: Dec 1, 2005 1:45:00 AM

Malicious messages that purport to be from the FBI, CIA or Paris Hilton generated the vast majority of virus-laden e-mail traffic in November, according to security companies.

The e-mails carry a new variant of the Sober worm in an attachment which, when opened, infects the recipient's computer. The worm then attempts to disable antivirus programs and send copies of itself to any e-mail addresses found on the hard drive.

The Sober worm still accounts for close to 43 percent of all viruses being reported to the British antivirus firm Sophos. At its peak, it accounted for one out of every 13 e-mails relayed over the Internet, the group said on Wednesday.

As the most widespread variant since Sober first appeared about two years ago, the new offshoot has threatened to overwhelm e-mail servers and slow message delivery, Sophos said. Postini, another computer security firm, estimates that the latest Sober outbreak is twice as large as the biggest previous attack.

Infected e-mails carry a variety of messages. One claims to be a message from the FBI or CIA. It informs recipients that they've visited illegal Web sites and instructs them to answer questions in the e-mail's attachment. Another promises video clips of socialites Paris Hilton and Nicole Richie, while a German version references that country's version of the TV show "Who Wants To Be A Millionare."

"Mocking the feds is a sure-fire way of goading the authorities, and you can't help but wonder whether the author is desperate to be caught," Carole Theriault, senior security consultant at Sophos, said in a statement.

Sophos also reported that close to 3 percent of all e-mails, or one in 38, contain viruses. The firm collects data from a global network of monitoring stations.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 20 Talkback(s)
Well there are a number of things
The primary issue is Window's origins are stand alone pc's which weren't designed to really talk to one another. Most of the networking capabilities were added as a response to demand. As a result, ... (Read the rest)
Posted by: maldain Posted on: 01/05/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
A not a single mention...  Richard Flude | 11/30/05
Why would the platform be mentioned?  toadlife | 11/30/05
Back under your rock, toad!  georgep_z | 12/01/05
Why not state the obvious?  toadlife | 12/01/05
Back under your rock, toad!  georgep_z | 12/01/05
Because Linux and Mac users aren't affected?  whisperycat | 12/01/05
Beating a dead horse  Real World | 12/01/05
"So why aren't Mac and Linux users affected?"  brian ansorge | 12/01/05
Clueless is as clueless does, Chester  Real World | 12/01/05
C-L-U-E-L-E-S-S  brian ansorge | 12/01/05
Question for you brian  toadlife | 12/01/05
Question for you brian  toadlife | 12/01/05
I can tell you what it isn't  NonZealot | 12/01/05
Well there are a number of things  maldain | 01/05/06
What's wrong with beating a dead horse?  Haterock Davidsfather | 12/01/05
Yes  toadlife | 12/01/05
Max Planck version of Sober?  tprince@... | 12/01/05
HEY!  mujadaddy | 12/02/05
HEY!  mujadaddy | 12/02/05
Hey ZDnet!! Two words:  mujadaddy | 12/02/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads