On mySimon: Pretend and Play Doctor Set
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Joris Evers
Posted on ZDNet News: Feb 21, 2006 10:59:00 PM

A serious flaw in Mac OS X could be a conduit for attackers to install malicious code on computers running the Apple Computer software, experts warned Tuesday.

The security problem is the third to surface for the operating system in the past week. It exposes Mac users to risks that are more familiar to Windows users: Visiting a malicious Web site using Apple's Safari Web browser could result in a rootkit, a backdoor or other malicious software being installed on the computer without the user noticing anything, experts said.

"This could be really bad," the SANS Internet Storm Center, which tracks network threats, said Tuesday. "Attackers can run shell scripts on your computer remotely just by visiting a malicious Web site."

Apple is developing a patch for the flaw, a company representative told CNET News.com. "We're working on a fix so that this doesn't become something that could affect customers," the representative said, but could not give a delivery date for the update.

Word of the new vulnerability comes after the recent discovery of a Trojan horse and a worm that target Mac users. The operating system had not been in the security crosshairs previously.

The new problem, discovered by Michael Lehn and first reported by Heise Online, lies in the way Mac OS X processes archive files. An attacker could embed malicious code in a ZIP file and host that on a Web site. The file and the embedded code would run when a Mac user visits the site using the Safari browser, experts said.

"Essentially, the operating system is executing commands that come in the metadata for ZIP files," said Alfred Huger, senior director of engineering at Symantec. "That is exacerbated by the problem that Safari will automatically open the file when you encounter it on the Web."

The issue may go beyond archive files, SANS said in updated notes on its Web site. "The attacker doesn't need to send a ZIP archive; the shell script itself can be disguised to practically anything," the note said.

The culprit appears to be the Mac OS Finder, the component of the operating system used to view and organize files, according to the SANS posting. A malicious file can be masked to look innocent--for example, like a JPEG image--yet it will run and execute when opened, SANS said.

This occurs because the operating system assigns an identifying image for the file based on the file extension, but decides which application will handle the file based on file permissions, SANS said. If the file has any executable bits set, it will be run using Terminal, the Unix command line prompt used in Mac OS X, SANS said.

There are no known attacks that take advantage of the flaw, experts said. However, proof-of-concept code that demonstrates the security vulnerability is publicly available online and could be tweaked for use in cyberattacks. "The skill level required to exploit it is very low. Pretty much anyone can do it," Huger said.

In the Windows world, such flaws are often exploited to install spyware or ad-serving software on vulnerable PCs. While such insidious software may be rare for the Mac, there are back doors and rootkits for the operating system, Huger said. "I think you'd likely see those installed with this type of vulnerability," he said.

The vulnerability is rated "extremely critical" by security monitoring company Secunia. Symantec also rates it "fairly high risk," Huger said. "If you have a Mac and use Safari, it is something you should remediate immediately," he said.

Mac OS X users can protect themselves by disabling the "Open safe files after downloading" option in Safari. In addition, users should be cautious when surfing the Web, the Apple representative said. "Apple always advises Mac users to only accept files from vendors and Web sites that they know and trust."

Users of alternative browsers such as Firefox and Camino on the Mac are not exposed to the Web-based attack vector, experts said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 152 Talkback(s)
Mac v Microsoft
You know, I sit here and read these messages, and I just don't understand why everyone puts the blame on one company or the other. The software would be perfectly fine, "with all their flaws", if it w... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Sonoma54 Posted on: 03/18/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
OSX  bd048 | 02/21/06
Did you RTFA?  Jeff the god of biscuits | 02/21/06
i agree.......  waylander | 02/21/06
i Agree  pjones | 02/21/06
as previously stated  glocks out | 02/21/06
Are you serious?  ajole | 02/21/06
Oh ye of the low IQ  Rick_K | 02/22/06
Actually, um, you are wrong  NonZealot | 02/22/06
I wonder how it is...  A_Pickle | 02/22/06
A sad day....  IT Scion | 02/21/06
Rude awakening for Mac users  aetherjoy | 02/21/06
Oh yeah - "several" "vulnerability"  metavurt | 02/21/06
Welcome to our world.  A_Pickle | 02/22/06
Two is 'several? (nt)  s_gamgee | 02/22/06
Mac v Microsoft  Sonoma54 | 03/18/06
Heh.  A_Pickle | 02/21/06
Then you will be pleased to know...  Fred Fredrickson | 02/22/06
Stupid follower  whats the point | 02/23/06
Two is a barrage? (nt)  s_gamgee | 02/22/06
Don't underestimate how easy this is  NonZealot | 02/21/06
I expect only a few people have the required feature enabled on Safari tho  hipparchus2001 | 02/21/06
huh?  toadlife | 02/21/06
I thought a bunch of people said it wasn't  hipparchus2001 | 02/21/06
Read the advisory (diary) at SANS  toadlife | 02/21/06
THE ONE REAL COMPLAINT! (NT)  s_gamgee | 02/22/06
yes and no...  doh123 | 02/22/06
Mac's are easy to atack  IceTheNet@... | 02/21/06
Yes, it's a snap  Fred Fredrickson | 02/22/06
No big deal  NonZealot | 02/22/06
You Missed It  Nick_Gravelyn | 02/22/06
Vital System Files  dragosani | 02/22/06
You understood, he didn't (NT)  NonZealot | 02/22/06
impossible  corticus | 02/21/06
Take your troll elsewhere  tic swayback | 02/21/06
Don't you recognize a joke?  jrbeaman | 02/21/06
Even so...  evanwood | 02/21/06
well as a mac and pc user he sounds triumphant to me  hipparchus2001 | 02/21/06
Immune to viruses  alcedes | 02/21/06
Even if they don't gain market share  IceTheNet@... | 02/21/06
Market share plays a role. A big role.  Qbt | 02/21/06
Wake up!  TheCrow_z | 02/21/06
Hello!  Qbt | 02/22/06
Nice troll  Jeff the god of biscuits | 02/21/06
Impossible Indeed.  metavurt | 02/21/06
how is this an OS X flaw?  doh123 | 02/21/06
why its a MAC flaw  waylander | 02/21/06
Microsoft disagrees with you  tic swayback | 02/21/06
OOF! Score one for you!  ajole | 02/21/06
I don't understand how his post was wrong  NonZealot | 02/21/06
You have to ask yourself who made safari  IceTheNet@... | 02/21/06
Re-read for meaning  tic swayback | 02/22/06
Sure you did...  brichter | 02/21/06
It is an OSX flaw  tic swayback | 02/21/06
it's an oSX Flaw  pjones | 02/21/06
yep, it is an OSX flaw  doh123 | 02/21/06
Deafult settings are decided by idiots.  jrbeaman | 02/21/06
It's off  j.m.galvin | 02/21/06
Yeah kind of like firefox (NT)  ju1ce | 02/21/06
how do you figure  IceTheNet@... | 02/21/06
Because  baggins_z | 02/22/06
Not True  joeyp770 | 02/23/06
Who cares?  d1@... | 02/21/06
people with OSX should.  glocks out | 02/21/06
You need to grow up.  jrbeaman | 02/21/06
and yours is any better?  IceTheNet@... | 02/21/06
Those who don't want to see it become a trend  Boot_Agnostic | 02/24/06
Better Fix  tic swayback | 02/21/06
And what's to stop the exploit from running a different app  Lfraz | 02/22/06
Deny or not  Boot_Agnostic | 02/21/06
Wisdom in Star Trek  ITTech001 | 02/21/06
but but but  IT Scion | 02/21/06
Ha  ITTech001 | 02/21/06
Why "transparent"?  jrbeaman | 02/21/06
are you speaking of anoying the user to death  IceTheNet@... | 02/21/06
RE: Wisdom in Star Trek  richdave | 02/21/06
Simple  IT Scion | 02/21/06
So's Windows 3.1  Rodney Davis | 02/21/06
no viruses for my Altair 8800 either  hipparchus2001 | 02/21/06
And totally unsupported.  jrbeaman | 02/21/06
hate to burst your bubble  IceTheNet@... | 02/21/06
How so?  toadlife | 02/21/06
And how would they enter?  toadlife | 02/21/06
re: Wisdom in Star Trek  strawbrn | 02/21/06
If it exists in Linux or BSD  richdave | 02/21/06
Confusing kernel with OS  NonZealot | 02/21/06
I would tend to agree  IceTheNet@... | 02/21/06
I hope the corporation gave Apple time to fix the flaw before publicising  hipparchus2001 | 02/21/06
Give them time, since when?  ajole | 02/21/06
what?  doh123 | 02/21/06
it's twice as slow as current technology  glocks out | 02/21/06
Think again  IceTheNet@... | 02/21/06
Actually  IT Scion | 02/21/06
You must be...  A_Pickle | 02/21/06
or, "you must be..."  glocks out | 02/21/06
Not necessarily  j.m.galvin | 02/21/06
that's true  glocks out | 02/21/06
not correct Core Duo speeds check intel.com  hipparchus2001 | 02/21/06
Hah.  A_Pickle | 02/21/06
yeah...  doh123 | 02/23/06
As far as I understand it the Intel Core Duo is new tech, and 2.0Ghz is it  hipparchus2001 | 02/21/06
intel.com  glocks out | 02/21/06
The fastest core duo on intel.com is 2.16GHz  hipparchus2001 | 02/21/06
2 Ghz is fast.  jrbeaman | 02/21/06
OS X flaw exposes Macs  Loverock Davidson | 02/21/06
Me too.  A_Pickle | 02/21/06
Nothing is perfect.  jrbeaman | 02/21/06
Wake Up  Richard Flude | 02/21/06
Exactly...  ju1ce | 02/21/06
Do you eat pablum too?  jrbeaman | 02/21/06
Remember the IBM PC?  dgari | 02/22/06
The mighty Tiger is meowwing...  TrueSpeak | 02/21/06
They're getting bored...  TonyMcS | 02/21/06
Wait a minute....  IT Scion | 02/21/06
Here we go again...  Jeff the god of biscuits | 02/21/06
My TRICORDER is HACK PROOF  Jeff the god of biscuits | 02/21/06
I hacked your tricorder  IceTheNet@... | 02/21/06
It is only a matter of time folks  Jeff the god of biscuits | 02/21/06
But right now  hipparchus2001 | 02/21/06
Really??  Kid Icarus-21097050858087920245213802267493 | 02/21/06
If .net is heavily used in writing vista  hipparchus2001 | 02/21/06
Not that exposed  fingal | 02/21/06
You are right  NonZealot | 02/21/06
Who's not a zealot?  fingal | 02/21/06
Dunno. You certainly are one.  A_Pickle | 02/21/06
You are just so right!  NonZealot | 02/22/06
Annoy hardly...happy for ya! However like it or not guys  Laff | 02/22/06
Why did you reply?  NonZealot | 02/22/06
Noted and I will keep this in mind in out future exchanges.  Laff | 02/22/06
You underestimate how serious this is  Richard Flude | 02/21/06
THE FIX -- stop worrying  kray_z | 02/21/06
Too bad...  brichter | 02/21/06
Not Important  plokoonpma | 02/21/06
Guess Firefox is the best bet for mac too  DarthRidiculous | 02/21/06
Two weeks ago, there was a serious flaw with Firefox on OS X  george_ou | 02/21/06
Windows 3.1 security  dickrichard | 02/21/06
All talk...NO ACTION...  Anon_ymous | 02/21/06
Well I guess on the BRIGHT side now the Mac and OSX  Laff | 02/21/06
Action  brichter | 02/21/06
A more mature response!!!!  Anon_ymous | 02/22/06
Allow me to inject my ignorant observations  JCitizen | 02/21/06
JC... Just another c-unit  hackmeifyoucan | 02/22/06
Safari  s_gamgee | 02/22/06
Ha ! Ha ! So OS suX isn't Perfect??  jpr75_z | 02/22/06
My Left Shoe  Nick_Gravelyn | 02/22/06
Hmmm.....  IT Scion | 02/22/06
If I can change my homepage  s_gamgee | 02/22/06
FINALLY.....!  Hard Cider | 02/22/06
All that bragging about how good your os is  zmud | 02/22/06
INVINCIBLE!  Anon_ymous | 02/22/06
Good one!  zmud | 02/22/06
Bring them on  minardi | 02/22/06
Here we go again.  papatator | 02/22/06

What do you think?

advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here