On GameSpot: We try out down the PSP Go
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Joris Evers
Posted on ZDNet News: Mar 7, 2006 11:13:00 PM

A university systems engineer in Wisconsin is inviting hackers to break into his Mac.

Dave Schroeder, a senior systems engineer at the University of Wisconsin, launched his contest on Monday. An earlier challenge was too easy, he said.

Schroeder is asking hackers to alter the home page hosted on a Mac Mini that is running Mac OS X 10.4.5 with the latest security updates. The system has two local accounts, and has SHH and HTTP open--"a lot more than most Mac OS X machines will ever have open," Schroeder said on his Web site.

Secure Shell, or SSH, is used for logging into and executing commands on a networked computer, and HTTP, or HyperText Transfer Protocol, is the method used to transfer information on the Web.

Originally, the online event was scheduled to end on Friday. But because of the enormous attention, the time for the challenge has been cut short and will now end Tuesday at 10 p.m. PST, Schroeder said.

"It has been pretty surprising how well the little Mac Mini has stood up. It has taken a pounding," Schroeder said in a telephone interview. "The attention (the contest) has gotten has just exploded. This isn't a real, official test: It is just kind of done in the academic interest."

First contest
In the earlier challenge, an anonymous hacker claimed he was able to compromise OS X within 30 minutes using an undisclosed vulnerability. However, attackers were given user-level access to the system, rather than being shut out completely.

"The original challenge allowed any users to have local accounts to access the machine via SSH," Schroeder said in an interview via e-mail. "This is an important distinction, because if you have local--or physical--access to a computer, you have a very distinct leg-up in terms of the ability to escalate your privileges."

Early media reports on the first competition did not call out the fact that attackers were given local access to the system. This irked Schroeder, moving him to launch his own challenge. "The original article left readers with the impression that a Mac OS X machine could be easily hacked into just by being connected to the Internet," he said.

Still, the previous contest was a real challenge, Schroeder said. "Assuming it is genuine, it represents an as-yet-unknown local privilege escalation that would allow any local user to gain root-level access," he said. This could be a serious issue for any setting with shared machines, such as schools, he said.

It could also pose a problem for Web hosting providers that use Apple Computer's operating system, said Johannes Ullrich, chief research officer at SANS Institute. Customers on shared machines need access to update their Web sites. A privilege escalation flaw could let a malicious user with such access gain full control over a system, he said.

The hacker challenges come after weeks of scrutiny of the safety of OS X, prompted by the discovery of two worms, and the disclosure of a vulnerability that was deemed "extremely critical" by security monitoring company Secunia. Security experts are also questioning the effectiveness of Apple's latest patch.

Schroeder plans to sift through the log files of the Mac and publish anything interesting, he said in the phone interview. "I know it is disappointing that it will be ending early to a lot of people."

Earlier Tuesday, Schroeder said that most of the hacking attempts were from scripts and tools attempting to use common Web exploits, dictionary attacks against SSH, port scans and scans by security tools such as Nessus. On Tuesday morning the site was down briefly due to a denial-of-service attack, he said.

The person who does successfully hack Schroeder's Mac Mini is requested to send him an e-mail describing the attack. Schroeder plans to report that to the appropriate software vendors and will post results after the close of the challenge, he said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 64 Talkback(s)
No danger.
I think most of the people who are smart enough to switch have
already done so. I hate to say it, but most people are just not very
bright.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Immanuel Tranz-Mischen Posted on: 03/09/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Wow, yes, did not realize the last hack was because accounts were given out  DonnieBoy | 03/07/06
We don't even know that  tic swayback | 03/07/06
True, untill the give more information, this tells us nothing.  DonnieBoy | 03/07/06
Credit?  Fred Fredrickson | 03/07/06
They HAD to follow up on it  BitTwiddler | 03/08/06
they did mention  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
ZDnet was misleading!  An_Axe_to_Grind | 03/08/06
So who is taking bets?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/07/06
...  FreeBSD | 03/07/06
So before the machine is even compromised ...  ShadeTree | 03/08/06
RE: So who is taking bets?  crash89 | 03/07/06
Haven't your heard? There is one born everry minute. (nt)  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/07/06
Tada!!!  5th Limb in the Kisser | 03/07/06
Pretty Scary  crash89 | 03/07/06
one born...  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
Professional Hackers won?t advertise ?, a novice might, but ... (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/07/06
Professional Hackers? Is there such a thing?  Laff | 03/07/06
Oh, you believe that Osama is a dilettante because ...  Vily Clay | 03/07/06
At first I was going to say that Hacker to Terrorist was quite a stretch!  Laff | 03/08/06
Professional...  jasonp@... | 03/08/06
heh heh heh .... So are you saying there are those who  Laff | 03/08/06
distorted image  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
Can't the just call programers....programers?  Laff | 03/08/06
Laff, who's Osama - a professional or a dilettante? (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/08/06
definition...  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
You don't work in the intelligence field  Chad_z | 03/08/06
Define people who are making a living by high-scale hacking (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/08/06
I'll bet you that you'll LOSE!!!  5th Limb in the Kisser | 03/07/06
ZDNet isn't  Richard Flude | 03/07/06
Thanks, Dave.  zdnetGuy | 03/07/06
Kind of silly if you ask me  toadlife | 03/07/06
Yup  NonZealot | 03/07/06
Still a major advantage  Richard Flude | 03/07/06
Incorrect  java.user | 03/08/06
Correction  george_ou | 03/08/06
Not True  java.user | 03/08/06
Not.  nomorems | 03/08/06
i agree with this  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
And yet..  nomorems | 03/08/06
Nobody EVER listens to me!  JetJaguar | 03/07/06
Nope, not good enough  Boot_Agnostic | 03/08/06
like this?  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
btw: that was in a 24hr period.  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
Well, that should make anybody feel warm and fuzzy  Boot_Agnostic | 03/08/06
i would feel special...  linuxoverwindows | 03/09/06
The results are in!  crash89 | 03/08/06
I wish this guy would do the same test with a Windows XP product  mlindl | 03/08/06
well, i would say...  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
i like the idea myself  Monkey_MCSE | 03/08/06
For your infrmation  j.m.galvin | 03/08/06
then it sounds fair to test...  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
I forgot one thing  j.m.galvin | 03/08/06
so macs really are unhackable  corticus | 03/08/06
It's more secure than Windows  Chad_z | 03/08/06
Great Idea  miked@... | 03/08/06
in my post above...  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
Just saying  Boot_Agnostic | 03/08/06
Pointless  ibabadur1 | 03/08/06
why do hax0rz hax0r?  linuxoverwindows | 03/08/06
Most viruses don't attack port 80 or 443 anymore.  Narg | 03/08/06
Why worry then?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 03/08/06
dont tell them our secret!  linuxoverwindows | 03/09/06
No danger.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 03/09/06
but there are still some...  linuxoverwindows | 03/09/06

What do you think?

Premier Vendor Content Whitepapers, webcasts & resources from our Power Center Sponsors
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here