On CBSSports.com: Mike Tyson's daughter dies in accident
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Joris Evers
Posted on ZDNet News: Jul 18, 2006 11:00:00 AM

Some of Microsoft's efforts to make Windows Vista its most stable and secure operating system ever could cause instability and new security flaws, according to a Symantec report.

Researchers at Cupertino, Calif.-based Symantec examined the new networking technology in recent test releases of Vista, Microsoft's next major operating system release, according to the report. They found several security bugs and determined that Vista's networking technology will be less stable, at least in the short run, than Windows XP's, the report said.

"Microsoft has removed a large body of tried and tested code and replaced it with freshly written code, complete with new corner cases and defects," the researchers wrote in the report, scheduled for publication Tuesday. "This may provide for a more stable networking stack in the long term, but stability will suffer in the short term."

Vista, slated to be broadly available in January, will be the first major new version of Windows for PCs since XP, which was released in 2001. Microsoft has put a stronger emphasis on protecting PCs in the new operating system, as security has grown in importance over those five years. Symantec's report draws attention once again to Microsoft's goal of improved security and the hurdles it faces in getting there.

A Symantec representative said Symantec had provided the Redmond, Wash., company with a copy of the paper.

Microsoft, in a statement provided to CNET News.com, said Vista is being developed with the highest attention to security. Highlighting issues in early builds of Windows Vista does not accurately represent the quality and depth of the networking features, the software maker said.

"Given that Windows Vista is still in the beta stage of the development and not yet final, the claims made in this report are, at best, premature," Microsoft said. "And given the extensive work we are doing to make Windows Vista the most secure version of Windows yet, we believe the claims are also unsubstantiated."

Microsoft also noted that Vista will be the first client-based operating system to go through the company's complete Security Development Lifecycle, a process designed to prevent flaws and vet code before it ships.

Traditionally allies, Microsoft and Symantec are now going head-to-head in the security arena. In late May, Microsoft introduced Windows Live OneCare, a consumer security package, and the software giant is readying an enterprise product. Symantec has also sued Microsoft, alleging misuse of data storage technology it licensed to the company.

In their paper, titled "Windows Vista Network Attack Surface Analysis: A Broad Overview," Symantec researchers put the networking technology in Vista under a magnifying glass to determine its exposure to external attacks. The team said it found several flaws in build 5270 of Vista and even more in earlier test versions. However, these were all fixed by Microsoft in build 5384, the version of the operating system that was publicly released in May as Beta 2.

"While it is reassuring that Microsoft is finding and fixing these defects, we expect that vulnerabilities will continue to be discovered for some time," the researchers wrote. "A networking stack is a complex piece of software that takes many years to mature."

Hunting bugs
With each build, Microsoft seeks to make the code more stable. On Monday, it released to selected testers build 5472 of Vista, which likely has put right more bugs.

For maintenance purposes and to improve performance and stability, the company is building much of Vista's networking technology from the ground up. The clean-slate approach also lets it add features such as support for version 6 of the Internet Protocol (IPv6).

"We're not saying that Vista's network stack is going to be inherently insecure when it is released," Oliver Friedrichs, director of emerging technologies at Symantec Security Response, said in an interview Monday. "Vista is one of the most important technologies that will be released over the next year, and people should understand the ramifications of a virgin network stack."

Friedrichs noted that in the Linux networking stack, vulnerabilities and stability issues continue to surface well over five years after it was first released.

Aside from security flaws, features supported by Vista's new networking technology could expose a PC running the operating system, according to Symantec's report.

For example, Vista will be the first Windows version to support IPv6, the next update of the technology standard used to send information over computer networks, by default. To help transition to the new protocol and for peer-to-peer networking features, Microsoft has functionality called IPv6 tunneling in Vista. This functionality could expose PCs that otherwise would be invisible behind a firewall, Symantec said.

"IPv6 and its accompanying transition technologies allow an attacker access to hosts on private internal networks outside of the (purview) of the administrator," the researchers wrote. As Vista becomes available, businesses should update security systems, such as firewalls and intrusion detection systems, to prevent that, they wrote.

The technology that underlies Vista's peer-to-peer collaboration features, much ballyhooed by Microsoft, could also pose a security threat, Symantec said. To provide these features, Microsoft has added support for serverless name-resolution protocols, such as Peer Name Resolution Protocol (PNRP), that allow a Vista PC to operate in a network of Vista machines without a central server.

"As these technologies see wider deployment, we expect IPv6 and the new peer-to-peer protocols to play an increasing role in the delivery of malicious payloads," the Symantec paper said. "These features are critical to the success of Microsoft's peer-to-peer initiative but are also the same features that attackers need to deliver malicious content."

Although the Symantec report is one of the first more extensive looks at the security of Vista, the researchers looked at only a small part of the new operating system. Also, since Vista is still in development, much can still change.

"We expect many of our results to be invalidated by changes made prior to its public release," the researchers wrote.

But Friedrichs did underline the importance of networking technology in overall operating system security.

"The network stack is the first line of defense for an operating system, it is the primary component that separates an attacker from the operating system," he said. "It is very critical that this component is as robust as it can possibly be."

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 82 Talkback(s)
As any company that sells security software should.
Of course Symantec wants you to think that it will be insecure. If it is not their sales dry up! Your the one that doesn't get it! Symantec has a vested interest in saying Windows Vista is insecure.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: ShadeTree Posted on: 07/20/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
That's like having Pig Pen notice Lucy's cruelty to Charlie Brown,  HypnoToad | 07/18/06
Give it a rest  csa0307 | 07/18/06
Ummm no  prime21 | 07/18/06
Ummm yes  nikoli | 07/18/06
We have a winner  NonZealot | 07/18/06
Agreed  the_seb | 07/18/06
Depends which version  voska | 07/18/06
Your post shows how little you know about the subject.  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
All the "knowledge" in the world means nothing to personal  Laff | 07/19/06
I agree to simplicity  mypl8s4u2 | 07/19/06
You couldn't write a better comedy  Richard Flude | 07/18/06
What is even more pathetic ...  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
ROTFLMAO!!  Loverock Davidson | 07/18/06
An even better quote  NonZealot | 07/18/06
And they also wrote:  Richard Flude | 07/18/06
Another feeble attempt to slant what was said!  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
Sure... BUT... at release time...  Northwolf | 07/19/06
Your impersonation of Carnac aside, ....  ShadeTree | 07/19/06
I'm glad to see context..... but  mypl8s4u2 | 07/19/06
Elephant in the room  baggins_z | 07/18/06
Symantec sees an Achilles' heel in Vista  Loverock Davidson | 07/18/06
Recommend?  DangDaCommonCentz | 07/18/06
Hmmmmm....  Northwolf | 07/19/06
Misrepresented statement  mypl8s4u2 | 07/19/06
Could Symantec be more Transparent?  jpr75_z | 07/18/06
the devil and miss jones  not of this world | 07/18/06
What a hoot!  Linux User 147560 | 07/18/06
It is also in Windows XP.  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
May be true or not... haven't verified it yet...  Linux User 147560 | 07/18/06
Easy to say - difficult to prove! (nt)  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
There has been experimental IPv6 stacks  michael_t | 07/19/06
new code in Vista???  Linux Geek | 07/18/06
If it is new code it can't be Linux.  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
Erm...  zkiwi | 07/18/06
I do not work for or support SCO nor ...  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
Back under your rock  TonyMcS | 07/18/06
you got that right  mypl8s4u2 | 07/19/06
A NEW ROUND of pain starts (and we are not talking about middle-east ...)  michael_t | 07/18/06
The parts of the article you left out because ...  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
I'll give you this much....  Laff | 07/18/06
I didn  michael_t | 07/18/06
For years you luddites have been calling ...  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
Geezz ... for years I have been saying that YOU CANNOT RETROFIT GOOD DESIGN  michael_t | 07/18/06
"for years I have been saying that YOU CANNOT RETROFIT GOOD DESIGN" ....  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
Common sense makes NO sense to U? U are in worst shape  michael_t | 07/18/06
Shadetree the article doesn't even mention the new  Intellihence | 07/18/06
Wasn't worth 2 cents.  ShadeTree | 07/19/06
Maybe you don't get it......  mypl8s4u2 | 07/20/06
As any company that sells security software should.  ShadeTree | 07/20/06
Question for you michael  NonZealot | 07/18/06
Good point  the_seb | 07/18/06
Ah but....  Laff | 07/18/06
A more secure operating system?  the_seb | 07/18/06
Fair enough....I was not specific enough:)  Laff | 07/18/06
Winners and losers  NonZealot | 07/18/06
You are Kidding "NonZealot" ,,,right!!??  Northwolf | 07/19/06
Ouch Northwolf, pick yourself up off the floor!  NonZealot | 07/19/06
I've keep asking WHY should people switch to Vista but NO answer wink  michael_t | 07/18/06
Answered your question many times  NonZealot | 07/18/06
Great parody dude! (nt)  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
one observation is that  michael_t | 07/18/06
If dumb were funny ....  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
Even if dumb were funny ....  michael_t | 07/18/06
Just point to the URL of ONE of your list of compeling reasons...  michael_t | 07/18/06
What happened ? No Reply since YOU NEVER answered successfully ...  michael_t | 07/18/06
The fact that more then ones of us ...  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
Here's an answer  voska | 07/18/06
for people invested in XP ($$$, man-hours, etc) there is no SANE reason  michael_t | 07/18/06
Well......  Laff | 07/18/06
Good question  NonZealot | 07/18/06
In my oppinion as a technical person, Vista  michael_t | 07/18/06
RE: Good question  michael_t | 07/18/06
michael: dissapointing reply?  NonZealot | 07/18/06
RE: michael_t  ShadeTree | 07/18/06
RE: [michael: dissapointing reply?] Yet U have not replied with ANY substan  michael_t | 07/18/06
RE: [michael: dissapointing reply? to ShadyTree]  michael_t | 07/18/06
yeah,  mypl8s4u2 | 07/20/06
In response....  mypl8s4u2 | 07/20/06
LOL Symantec  zmud | 07/18/06
Hm, so to all the people who say MS needs to rewrite all of Windows,  PB_z | 07/18/06
And as an industry community, Symantec relates the info back to the source  Boot_Agnostic | 07/18/06
First time Symantec was concerned about a MS release.  osreinstall | 07/18/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Product Spotlight

advertisement
Click Here