On TechRepublic: Windows 7: Slower to boot than Vista?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Dawn Kawamoto
Posted on ZDNet News: Dec 14, 2006 7:50:00 PM

A third security flaw in Microsoft Word has emerged, according to some security companies, and a researcher has published code for it that could be used to launch an attack.

Secunia and McAfee said Thursday that a buffer-overflow flaw in the word-processing application could crash a computer and ultimately let an outsider run code on a vulnerable PC.

But Microsoft said it could not confirm the existence of the vulnerability on Thursday, noting that it was still investigating the issue.

The problem is the third to arise in Word in less than two weeks. The other two zero-day vulnerabilities also involve memory corruption issues, according to a security advisory from Secunia. So far, these unpatched flaws have been used only for limited and targeted attacks, Microsoft has said.

"Up until now, it was only the victims of the attack, the attacker and Microsoft who knew how these flaws were exploited," said Thomas Kristensen, Secunia's chief technology officer.

With the third possible vulnerability, the situation could be more serious. A software analyst who calls himself "Disco Jonny" has published proof-of-concept code that appears to use the security hole.

"The impact of the file I released would be a crash in Microsoft Word. This file could be taken and turned into a functioning exploit by a person skilled enough," Disco Jonny said in an e-mail interview. "This could then lead to code, controlled by the person who sent or created the file, being run on the victim's machine in the context of the current user that is logged in."

As such, the proof-of-concept code could serve as a template for hackers to create a functioning malicious attack. It exploits a third flaw, but exactly how the code works is not clear, said Dave Marcus, security research and communications manager at McAfee.

Disco Jonny said that part of his problem in trying to be more specific about the source of the code is that he does not have access to information about the characteristics of the first two Word vulnerabilities. Microsoft has released a security advisory on one of those flaws, and a blog posting on the other, but these do not include much detail.

"From conversations with others, I am pretty sure that this bug is not related to the two current Word issues," Disco Jonny said. "This is a third, as yet unknown vulnerability in Microsoft Word. Without having the other two word issues to look at, I cannot state 100 percent either way."

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 35 Talkback(s)
All Software Contains Flaws
Most software contains flaws? Yes. However, there are flaws and there are FLAWS! I have called Yahoo, Microsoft, Hewlett Packard and AOL idiots recently. My beef is that it seems that just when an... (Read the rest)
Posted by: kkaylynne Posted on: 12/18/06 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Attack code published for third Word flaw  Loverock Davidson | 12/14/06
And here at Zdnet  Boot_Agnostic | 12/14/06
Well, Yay Microsoft!  fuzzy2k | 12/14/06
Attack code published for third Word flaw  rondev | 12/14/06
While I don't disagree that the analyst was irresponsible  Michael Kelly | 12/14/06
Attack code published for third Word flaw  tic swayback | 12/14/06
well....  Badgered | 12/15/06
and you know this how?  discojonny | 12/15/06
One vulnerability after the other. What do you expect from the VILLAGE  DonnieBoy | 12/14/06
What vulnerability?  Loverock Davidson | 12/14/06
You mean there is no exploit in the wild, there IS a vulnerability, that  DonnieBoy | 12/14/06
actually...  Badgered | 12/15/06
Ah, and there he is, right on cue...  Confused by religion | 12/14/06
Right, the it is only the most brilliant programmers that build in all of  DonnieBoy | 12/14/06
Why is it you only care if it is a Microsoft?  ShadeTree | 12/18/06
All Software Contains Flaws  kkaylynne | 12/18/06
Let's spin this another way  nix_hed | 12/14/06
We got pretty much what we expected...  James T. Kirk | 12/15/06
It should be pretty easy for you to shoot my argument down, why didn't you  DonnieBoy | 12/15/06
Wow...  James T. Kirk | 12/15/06
Attack code published for third Word flaw  rondev | 12/14/06
Well, it's too coincidental to be taken  msolgeek | 12/14/06
Attack code published for third Word flaw  rondev | 12/14/06
No Problem  perryroyce@... | 12/14/06
Attack code published...  rondev | 12/14/06
How much hardening can a Windows box take?  whisperycat | 12/15/06
Wow, it's like Zdnet posters work at MS  Boot_Agnostic | 12/15/06
ZD Enquirer  corticus | 12/15/06
another point for open source,  brokndodge@... | 12/15/06
heh, it is funny you say that.  discojonny | 12/15/06
Buffer Overflow Again?  yasmiin | 12/15/06
Not just MS, every vendor  Boot_Agnostic | 12/15/06
Sounds like a...  Rick_K | 12/15/06
Buy a Mac, it's users never point fingers, cause exploits  Boot_Agnostic | 12/18/06
Software Bugs  kkaylynne | 12/18/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads