On mySimon: The Art of Shaving Engraved Shaving Set
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Joris Evers
Posted on ZDNet News: Feb 7, 2007 1:53:00 AM

There are signs that hackers attacked key parts of the backbone of the Internet on Tuesday, but no damage seems to have been done, experts said.

The attack appears to have focused on the Domain Name System, which maps text-based domain names, such as "News.com," to the actual numeric IP addresses of servers connected to the Internet, and vice versa. Several key DNS servers saw traffic spike in the early morning on Tuesday, several experts said--a sign of an attack.

"It is an unusual large amount of traffic that is hitting DNS servers," said John Crain, chief technical officer at the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which operates one of the main so-called root DNS servers. "We see large attacks on a regular basis, but this hit quite a few servers, so it was fairly large."

Yet the DNS servers were able to withstand the onslaught, Crain added. "It was irritating. It ruined my night's sleep. It was extraordinary in the fact that it happened to multiple systems at once, but this is not affecting Internet users," he said.

DNS serves as the address books for the Internet. There are 13 official root DNS servers, which sit at the top of the DNS hierarchy. These root servers get queried only if other DNS servers, like those at an internet service provider, don't have the right IP address for a specific Web site.

If part of the DNS system goes down, Web sites could become unreachable and e-mail could become undeliverable. But DNS is built to be resilient, and attacks on the system are rare. In 2002, a similar denial-of-service attack also failed.

"The main thing is that there was very little impact on the general public, the servers were able to hold up against the attacks," said Zully Ramzan, a researcher at Symantec Security Response. "The Internet in general was designed to even withstand a nuclear attack."

The barrage of data being apparently targeted at the DNS system started around 2.30 a.m. Pacific Time on Tuesday. Multiple root servers saw a traffic spike, but the "G" server, run by the U.S. Department of Defense, and "L," run by ICANN, seem to have gotten the brunt of it, Ramzan said. ICANN's Crain confirmed that impression.

While ICANN and Symantec didn't see any effect on the Internet at large, Internet service provider Neustar did see slow downs on the Net. "We would call it a brownout instead of a blackout. It was significant, but it did not take anything down," a representative for the company said.

The true cause of the traffic surge still needs to be determined, both Ramzan and Crain said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 41 Talkback(s)
These servers run...
Do we know just what these servers run? A DNS daemon can run on any OS you want it to, and what you'll want is something that's purely dedicated to that task. I should suspect a BSD or Linux system with little more than that daemon.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: ehwood Posted on: 02/10/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Ever wonder why?  Graham Fluet | 02/06/07
Notice, thse servers do NOT run Windows.  DonnieBoy | 02/07/07
Notice these (sic) servers do NOT run Mac OS X Server  Confused by religion | 02/07/07
Stupid Responses  Free_Thinker | 02/07/07
Re: Stupid Responses  Uncle Buck | 02/07/07
My retort was a rebuke to DonnieBoy...  Confused by religion | 02/07/07
Umm...  jjarman | 02/07/07
not so much...  doas777 | 02/07/07
huh? attack doesn't vary but response and ability to handel does!  jjarman | 02/07/07
Thanks. There are some think you could throw up any old OS and it would not  DonnieBoy | 02/07/07
Oh puh-LEEZE!  James T. Kirk | 02/07/07
poor janeway and cisco...  jjarman | 02/07/07
So, in your opinion...  Confused by religion | 02/07/07
Jeez, Milly... it was a joke.  James T. Kirk | 02/07/07
My bad!  Confused by religion | 02/07/07
Excuse me, the OS for a critical part of the internet is VERY important,  DonnieBoy | 02/07/07
I agree.  swoopee | 02/08/07
OSX would make a great server OS for DNS, but there is limited hardware  DonnieBoy | 02/07/07
These servers run...  ehwood | 02/10/07
What the servers run...  Raymond Danner | 02/07/07
o.s. obsession/prejudice  RDrr | 02/07/07
A practice run?  the_doge | 02/07/07
TCP/IP  doas777 | 02/07/07
Practice Run  shealanon@... | 02/07/07
DRDoS  ehwood | 02/10/07
Thank you , Z-Dnet, ...  bob in FL | 02/07/07
CNET is NOT a real-time monitoring site  sfortuna@... | 02/07/07
Michael A. Redwine  michael.redwine@... | 02/07/07
So what is a work around?  LittleGuy | 02/07/07
won't work  doas777 | 02/07/07
Alternate DNS Service?  pj_mouse | 02/07/07
Nope, they too have to get the updated information from the root servers.  DonnieBoy | 02/07/07
...my ISP's DNS has too many problems.  swoopee | 02/08/07
THE SERVER ATTACK COULD BE STOPPED  BALTHOR | 02/07/07
contraversy  doas777 | 02/07/07
The UN could pass a resolution... next year NT  rgranger | 02/07/07
Lordy, lordy...  Mr_Wizard | 02/07/07
Suppose the servers do go down.  interested_amateur@... | 02/07/07
DNS is a distributed system  swoopee | 02/08/07
pretty much  kamahl928 | 02/08/07
DNS under attack all the time  Sxooter_z | 02/09/07

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads