On MovieTome: Favreau gives us details on IRON MAN 2
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Matt Hines
Posted on ZDNet News: Nov 30, 2004 7:48:00 PM

A flaw in popular Windows server software could allow remote attacks to be launched against systems, Microsoft has confirmed.

The vulnerability is in Windows Internet Name Service, or WINS, a network infrastructure component of server products such as Windows NT 4.0 Server, Windows 2000 Server and Windows Server 2003, Microsoft said Tuesday. The company has issued a temporary work-around for the problem while it works on an update to fix the vulnerability.

The problem, first made public last Friday by security software maker Immunity, is being defined by Microsoft as a "a remote buffer overflow" flaw that could enable an attacker to run malicious software on vulnerable servers.

Microsoft said its Windows 2000 Professional, Windows XP and Windows Me products are not affected by the security hole. Security company Secunia has rated the flaw "moderately critical."

WINS is a server-naming tool used to identify the IP address of specific computers on a network. The problem affects a replication function in the software that allows servers loaded with WINS to communicate. Microsoft pointed out that the infrastructure tool is not turned on by default and said the feature is not typically used by network administrators on Internet-facing servers.

The company said it has not been informed of any actual exploits of the WINS flaw, but that it will continue to monitor the situation.

A Microsoft representative said the company is working on a permanent fix for the vulnerability, which it plans to release as part of its normal monthly update process. For the time being, it is advising customers to simply turn off the WINS function if not needed on servers. It also suggests blocking several ports, including TCP port 42 and UDP port 42, at their network firewalls, or using IP security to protect traffic between WINS-capable servers. Other details of the work-around are available on Microsoft's Knowledge Base Web site.

The disclosure of the WINS flaw revived an ongoing debate over how much time security companies should give software makers to patch a vulnerability before they make the flaw public. The Microsoft representative said the company was "concerned that the vulnerability was disclosed irresponsibly" by Immunity and that tools designed to exploit the problem have been made publicly available as a result.

"Microsoft believes the presence of exploit code for vulnerabilities that have not been addressed by an update puts customers at risk from attack by criminals," the Microsoft representative said.

"Microsoft continues to encourage responsible disclosure of software vulnerabilities. We believe the commonly accepted practice of reporting vulnerabilities directly to a vendor serves everyone's best interests," the representative added.

Calls seeking comment from Immunity on its reports of the flaw were not immediately returned.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 102 Talkback(s)
I am sure the OS you wrote is more secure
So when will you be releasing this PERFECT OS?? (Read the rest)
Posted by: djc1309@... Posted on: 12/08/04 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Tuesday already? DebianDog   | 11/30/04
Unguarded Windows porked in four minutes Chad_z   | 11/30/04
Only a matter of time. sguerin_z   | 12/01/04
Once again there are TWO factors in hacks..the amount Laff   | 12/01/04
There are probably 4 factors... Jester_z   | 12/01/04
stupid hackers Me_too   | 12/01/04
WINS was a huge mistake anyway toadlife   | 11/30/04
Not really Suicida|   | 12/01/04
Microsoft Should Blast Itself itanalyst   | 11/30/04
Gee, how did we know what you would say? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/30/04
Not Hard To Figure You Out Either itanalyst   | 11/30/04
When have I heard that before? NonZealot   | 11/30/04
Those are funny voska   | 11/30/04
Flawed reasoning Chad_z   | 11/30/04
Not really NonZealot   | 11/30/04
Good Analogy htotten   | 12/01/04
And this from a *non* zealot Jay Cash   | 11/30/04
What is your definition of a zealot? NonZealot   | 11/30/04
Aren't there michael-t   | 11/30/04
Count back. Cardinal_Bill   | 11/30/04
Ah name calling, last vestige when your losing. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/30/04
defending ms again - ms has no faults in your eyes JasonL31   | 11/30/04
Jason..to be fair to NO AX I have read several posts Laff   | 12/01/04
Have to agree with that one as well. htotten   | 12/01/04
Technically he has a point voska   | 11/30/04
Can't tell, couldn't get past his insults. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/30/04
Re: Can't tell, couldn't get past his insults. none none   | 11/30/04
huh? none none   | 11/30/04
******** in the Title? Spoon Jabber   | 12/01/04
My point exactly dave95   | 11/30/04
This is why they have IT Professionals... PhoenixStorm26   | 11/30/04
*nix should Blast Itself NonZealot   | 11/30/04
Who uses Wins these days anyways? voska   | 11/30/04
Umm Suicida|   | 12/01/04
98 clients htotten   | 12/01/04
People do that? voska   | 12/01/04
win 98 sadchild   | 12/01/04
What A Lie From Sadchild! nikoli   | 12/01/04
Some of us have no choice... tbbrickster_z   | 12/02/04
What are michael-t   | 11/30/04
BIND htotten   | 12/01/04
Flaw does not affect Windows prior to 2003 server GregSalts   | 12/01/04
No, that's because WINS won't run on anything but Server. indigo_z   | 12/01/04
Unix is not a monoculture hulse_kevin   | 12/01/04
OSS isnt perfect either Suicida|   | 12/01/04
Give me your car keys then GregSalts   | 12/01/04
Umm since when do wins servers... ITsucks   | 11/30/04
Presumably... John L. Ries   | 11/30/04
'Latest Product Announcements' michael-t   | 11/30/04
WAY OFF TOPIC News Flash Squawkbox   | 11/30/04
Godzillar...ROCKS! heh heh heh Laff   | 12/01/04
Oh no... rapson   | 12/01/04
Carl are you a BOC fan too? Squawkbox   | 12/01/04
Dominance and Submission rapson   | 12/01/04
Age ummmm yeah see ya later (NT) Squawkbox   | 12/01/04
Talk about "SHOOTING THE MESSENGER"... (nt) Bit's_Conscience   | 11/30/04
This isn't news CobraA1   | 11/30/04
Microsoft wants more cover-ups. systemcleaner   | 11/30/04
What a Blame Thrower............. GregSalts   | 12/01/04
Same deja vu Microsoft cliche. systemcleaner   | 12/01/04
I guess only in America GregSalts   | 12/01/04
Nope rapson   | 12/01/04
There is no need to do that. systemcleaner   | 12/01/04
And that means... systemcleaner   | 12/01/04
to every reason, blame, blame, blame GregSalts   | 12/01/04
Bingo. systemcleaner   | 12/01/04
sorry JasonL31   | 11/30/04
Office 2003 scferg   | 12/01/04
Thanks for the warning. systemcleaner   | 12/01/04
Oops, your ignorance is showing through NonZealot   | 12/01/04
Big deal! systemcleaner   | 12/01/04
I am sure the OS you wrote is more secure djc1309@...   | 12/08/04
Wrong rapson   | 12/01/04
Colour me a skeptic NonZealot   | 12/01/04
Works fine for me rapson   | 12/01/04
This only caused problems on machines running through Monkey_MCSE   | 12/01/04
Actually it is fixed Monkey_MCSE   | 12/01/04
OpenOffice.org indigo_z   | 12/01/04
WINS is needed for Linux-based Samba... PhilippeV   | 12/01/04
seems windows is always getting it's crack opened sadchild   | 12/01/04
OMG -- Ditch MS now!! IT Scion   | 12/01/04
Bingo! NonZealot   | 12/01/04
Of course not lengua99   | 12/02/04
Explain that to me IT Scion   | 12/02/04
Just another Microsoft PR excuse. systemcleaner   | 12/01/04
Wow! What crap is this?? Confused by religion   | 12/01/04
More and more MS deceptions. systemcleaner   | 12/01/04
Cover up? IT Scion   | 12/01/04
Excuses, excuses, and more excuses. systemcleaner   | 12/01/04
Blame, Blame, Blame .... Blame of Fools GregSalts   | 12/01/04
No different... rapson   | 12/01/04
What else could it be... systemcleaner   | 12/01/04
Microsoft's way of customer service. systemcleaner   | 12/01/04
I guess any logical debate was too much for you.(nt) IT Scion   | 12/02/04
And if the OS was a CAR... el1jones   | 12/01/04
So where do you draw the line PA-ITGuy   | 12/01/04
But in reality... IT Scion   | 12/02/04
Microsoft ... puts customers at risk from attack by criminals. indigo_z   | 12/01/04
Walking in the south side of town does the same thing.... GregSalts   | 12/02/04
Stop the Microsoft excuses. Read the heading of this article. systemcleaner   | 12/02/04
You're in over your head. IT Scion   | 12/02/04
Is this the MS server used in the US election PCs kohuratahi   | 12/03/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement