On TV.com: CLEVELAND SHOW delayed until Fall 2009
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Joris Evers
Posted on ZDNet News: Sep 15, 2006 4:35:00 AM

The nonprofit group behind a popular blacklist used to block spam has been hit with a multimillion-dollar judgment, but the order may not be enforceable.

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ordered Wednesday that Spamhaus must pay $11,715,000 in damages to e360insight and its chief, David Linhardt, who sued the U.K.-based organization earlier this year over blacklisting.

The court also barred Spamhaus from causing any e-mail sent by e360insight or Linhardt to be "blocked, delayed, altered, or interrupted in anyway" and ordered Spamhaus to publish an apology stating that Linhardt and his company are not spammers, according to a copy of the order.

"This ruling confirms e360insight's position that Spamhaus.org is a fanatical, vigilante organization that operates in the United States with blatant disregard for U.S. law," Linhardt wrote in an e-mail to CNET News.com on Thursday.

Spamhaus appears unfazed by the ruling. In a statement on its Web site, Spamhaus dismissed the judgment as invalid and charges that the court was "bamboozled by spammers." Spamhaus didn't mount a defense in the case; the ruling was a default judgment in absence of counterarguments.

"Default judgments obtained in U.S. county, state or federal courts have no validity in the U.K. and cannot be enforced under the British legal system," Spamhaus said on its Web site. "As spamming is illegal in the U.K., an Illinois court ordering a British organization to stop blocking incoming Illinois spam in Britain goes contrary to U.K. law which orders all spammers to cease sending spam in the first place."

Linhardt and his company are indeed spammers and remain on the Spamhaus blocklist, Spamhaus said. Posting a note that e360insignt was inaccurately labeled as a spammer would be a lie, Spamhaus said. If Linhardt wants a ruling that counts, he needs to refile his case in the U.K., according to Spamhaus.

The Spamhaus blocklist is a database of verified spam sources that is supplied at no cost to help e-mail administrators clean incoming e-mail streams. Spam accounts for about 75 percent of all e-mail, and the Spamhaus list is one of the most popular such blacklists to help cleanse e-mail.

"The Spamhaus guys are good guys, and they are doing the right thing. It is a pity that the court system in the U.S. can be abused in such a fashion as it is," said Dean Drako, the CEO of Barracuda Networks, a Mountain View, Calif.-based maker of antispam appliances. Barracuda offers the Spamhaus list in its appliances.

Spammers often threaten with lawsuits, but don't often follow through, Drako said. Senders of the junk mail fight blacklists because they hurt business.

"If a spammer gets listed, less spam gets through, and their revenue is related to the amount of spam that gets read," Drako said.

Like Spamhaus, Drako does not expect the Illinois judgment to have any effect in the fight against spam.

"I don't think the lawsuit actually means anything," he said.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 78 Talkback(s)
Exactly right
Exactly, if i recieved a summons from a US court or any other court not in the uk to appear before them, i like all of you would ignore it, how many of you americans would appear in a uk court under the same circumstances..... none!!!... (Read the rest)
Posted by: cal001uk@yahoo.co.uk Posted on: 09/19/06 You are currently: Logged In as: a Guest  | Login | Terms of Use
More proof the judicial system in America does not work.  BeGoneFool | 09/14/06
Default Judgement  Furiousrog | 09/15/06
That is a nice sentiment; however...  vandaluna | 09/16/06
Jurisdiction?  gordon@... | 09/15/06
Re:Jurisdiction?  Scrat | 09/15/06
The US court had jurisdiction under US law.  maldain | 09/15/06
Sorry, but  Update victim | 09/15/06
US courts are very similar to UK in this respect  Peter.mitchell@... | 09/16/06
Federal Rules  vandaluna | 09/16/06
To be fair...  uberpinguin | 09/15/06
It's also your duty to protect your resources...  joemartn | 09/15/06
anti spam  hpritchett@... | 09/18/06
Blacklisters understand breached systems  tygeverink@... | 09/15/06
hi-jack?  vandaluna | 09/16/06
e360 is a company....  DCMann | 09/15/06
Actually it's not a case of a fubar'd legal system.  maldain | 09/15/06
ummm...  vandaluna | 09/16/06
Missing an important detail  mel8964 | 09/15/06
e360 DID show up....  DCMann | 09/15/06
show up  vandaluna | 09/16/06
jurisdiction  slsmag | 09/18/06
Exactly right  cal001uk@... | 09/19/06
Spamhaus legal? extortion racket  iceburner | 09/15/06
Umm - no  Mech422 | 09/15/06
Government in general is clueless about tech issues.  jsteffzd | 09/15/06
Cause government people are old....  CKayote | 09/18/06
ACL for e360  tf2RI52WC873 | 09/18/06
Are you kidding?  DCMann | 09/15/06
Nice try, spammer...  JDThompson | 09/15/06
Jurisdictions....  LordNyghthawk@... | 09/15/06
The primary difference would be  maldain | 09/15/06
UK & Miscrosoft  cprompt@... | 09/15/06
Have a nice day..  YukonRay | 09/16/06
Nice try shill  Update victim | 09/15/06
Jurisdictions  dfruk@... | 09/16/06
Spam Fighter  emzit@... | 09/15/06
Free Speech  YukonRay | 09/16/06
Free speech my @ss  pgm554 | 09/16/06
Nice of you to be so passionate  YukonRay | 09/16/06
And you are clueless  slim-01 | 09/17/06
you think??  vandaluna | 09/17/06
you think??  vandaluna | 09/17/06
How are spammers theives?  YukonRay | 09/18/06
Unsolicited bulk mail / Spam is theft.  stchrispy | 09/18/06
Waste of my time is a thief ---  YukonRay | 09/18/06
Spammers are thieves because...  daveword@... | 09/18/06
"Jusrisdiction?"  cprompt@... | 09/15/06
domestication  vandaluna | 09/16/06
Spamhaus "knows" their service is ineffective how?  ghastly | 09/19/06
To Be Fair...  razzx51@... | 09/15/06
Spam Judgement  vger_z | 09/15/06
A ruling that stated e360....  DCMann | 09/15/06
You didn't read the ruling, did you.!  YukonRay | 09/16/06
Blacklitsts  tony@... | 09/15/06
The tax idea..  vandaluna | 09/16/06
Pound Salt  YukonRay | 09/16/06
Fight Back  pjthys | 09/15/06
Individual Volunteerism  Naomi Bigelow | 09/15/06
Fair vs. Unfair Blacklisting  Naomi Bigelow | 09/15/06
The good guys finally won one  jsm555 | 09/15/06
Your fighting the wrong enemy  slim-01 | 09/17/06
You can blame the criminal AND the cops if both are wrong  jsm555 | 09/18/06
Arguments aside, the point is ....  WCarlS | 09/15/06
Untrue...  vandaluna | 09/16/06
Waste of time ?  Leryis | 09/16/06
Fighting spam is everybody's business  james4shari | 09/15/06
it this is the guy who dumps 600 mails on  bernhug | 09/16/06
spam  lowrider2006@... | 09/16/06
I Respectfully Disagree  hforman@... | 09/16/06
Spamhaus just blackmail group  kokuryu | 09/18/06
Just maybe the judge doesn't care  KrazyGuy | 09/18/06
maybe the judge doesn't care  tf2RI52WC873 | 09/18/06
er....  Stuka | 09/18/06
hilarious ...  zoroaster | 09/18/06
Don;t let the flag kick you on the way out!!!  YukonRay | 09/18/06
More Power-Hungry U.S. Judges  archetuthus | 09/18/06
Spamhaus dropped the ball  Shark64 | 09/19/06
oh contrare  ghastly | 09/19/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

Fusion

advertisement
Click Here