On TechRepublic: 10 dying IT skills
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Alorie Gilbert
Posted on ZDNet News: Oct 19, 2005 4:37:00 PM

The Association of American Publishers has filed a lawsuit against Google, alleging the Internet company's plans to scan and digitally distribute the text of major library collections would violate copyright protections.

The group filed suit after lengthy discussions with Google's management about the company's Print Library Project broke down, the AAP said on Wednesday.

As part of the project, Google is working to scan all or parts of the book collections of the University of Michigan, Harvard University, Stanford University, the New York Public Library and Oxford University. It plans to let people search the texts. The company also intends to sell advertisements related to such searches.

"The publishing industry is united behind this lawsuit against Google and united in the fight to defend their rights," AAP President and former Colorado Congresswoman Patricia Schroeder said in a statement. "While authors and publishers know how useful Google's search engine can be and think the Print Library could be an excellent resource, the bottom line is that under its current plan, Google is seeking to make millions of dollars by freeloading on the talent and property of authors and publishers."

The AAP suit follows a similar action by the Authors Guild, which sued Google last month over the library project. Other groups, including the Association of American University Presses, have also criticized the book-scanning plan.

Google has defended itself, saying the project is fully consistent with the fair-use doctrine under U.S. copyright law, which allows for excerpts in book reviews. The company said in August, however, that it would temporarily halt the project to respond to concerns. It plans to resume the project on Nov. 1, AAP said.

The AAP suit seeks a declaration by the court that Google commits infringement when it scans entire books covered by copyright and a court order preventing Google from doing so without permission from copyright owners. The group filed the suit on behalf of McGraw-Hill, Pearson Education, Penguin Group, Simon & Schuster, and John Wiley & Sons.

"Google Print is a historic effort to make millions of books easier for people to find and buy. Creating an easy-to-use index of books is fair use under copyright law and supports the purpose of copyright: to increase the awareness and sales of books directly benefiting copyright holders," said David Drummond, Google's vice president of corporate development and general counsel. "This short-sighted attempt to block Google Print works counter to the interests of not just the world's readers, but also the world's authors and publishers."

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 74 Talkback(s)
Opt out if other conditions are met
They didn't even try.

Google is caching content by 3rd parties. Amazon gets theirs directly from the publisher. Google is also caching the entire book. Doesn't matter if a few sentences are dis... (Read the rest)
Posted by: osreinstall Posted on: 10/23/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Publishers sue Google over book search project  Loverock Davidson | 10/19/05
The question is,  rapson | 10/19/05
Answer  Loverock Davidson | 10/19/05
You are both completely wrong  tic swayback | 10/19/05
There is a little difference  John Zern | 10/19/05
Lots of websites charge money for access  tic swayback | 10/20/05
Isn't profiting the point  voska | 10/19/05
Profiting is NOT the Point!  Noel@... | 10/19/05
I don't think so  voska | 10/19/05
I beg to differ  dayjm | 10/19/05
Scanners don't matter  voska | 10/20/05
Your opinion is not very well informed  tic swayback | 10/19/05
No, you don't understand copyright law nor Google Print  johnfwilhite@... | 10/20/05
Here we go  Protector | 10/19/05
If you're saying...  rapson | 10/19/05
Another point  rapson | 10/19/05
Publishers' rights are limited by law  tic swayback | 10/19/05
Yes, but Google is not being fair.  osreinstall | 10/19/05
Incorrect  tic swayback | 10/19/05
I am not that far off  osreinstall | 10/19/05
Running roughshod?  tic swayback | 10/19/05
Doesn't matter even if it helps.  osreinstall | 10/19/05
Where is that right guaranteed?  tic swayback | 10/19/05
You are wrong again.  osreinstall | 10/19/05
Fair Use Is Determained by The Courts  Ed_Meyers | 10/19/05
I'm not wrong  tic swayback | 10/19/05
Re-do on the link  tic swayback | 10/19/05
Tic, you are wrong.  osreinstall | 10/19/05
Osreinstall parody isn't the only fair use  Ed_Meyers | 10/19/05
Did you read that page yourself?  tic swayback | 10/20/05
It will be interesting Ed.  osreinstall | 10/20/05
Tic, this isn't fair use.  osreinstall | 10/20/05
Let a judge decide  voska | 10/20/05
A judge will decide if it's fair use  tic swayback | 10/20/05
The judge will not decide the way you want.  osreinstall | 10/20/05
Now you're a fortune teller?  tic swayback | 10/20/05
Doesn't take a fortune teller to use common sense.  osreinstall | 10/20/05
Copyright is copyright  tic swayback | 10/20/05
The EFF is not the end all be all.  osreinstall | 10/20/05
So you can't disprove the EFF's reasoning?  tic swayback | 10/20/05
Not really  osreinstall | 10/20/05
Really  tic swayback | 10/20/05
Crud, having typing issues, here's the rest.  tic swayback | 10/20/05
Google isn't all that great.  osreinstall | 10/20/05
You have some major misconceptions  tic swayback | 10/21/05
And you have more  osreinstall | 10/21/05
Just trying to clear up a few facts for you...  tic swayback | 10/21/05
Clear yourself up first.  osreinstall | 10/21/05
I'm in the publishing industry, I know of which I speak  tic swayback | 10/21/05
I will look for that pay me to display me idea.  osreinstall | 10/21/05
Sounds like you favor an opt out system  tic swayback | 10/23/05
Kane  tic swayback | 10/23/05
Wow!  tic swayback | 10/23/05
Opt out if other conditions are met  osreinstall | 10/23/05
So it's OK that someone should...  John Zern | 10/19/05
If The Copyright Is Expired  Ed_Meyers | 10/19/05
Only if the book is in the public domain...  tic swayback | 10/20/05
Only public domain stuff  voska | 10/20/05
Copyright Holder's Rights Versus Limitations and Exceptions  Ed_Meyers | 10/19/05
The really stupid thing about this lawsuit  tic swayback | 10/19/05
As it should be  rapson | 10/19/05
The great irony of this  tic swayback | 10/19/05
So do they sue bookstores next?  voska | 10/19/05
These groups are incredibly stupid  tic swayback | 10/19/05
Google's wrong for this reason...  John Zern | 10/19/05
Google is not wrong, but you are  johnfwilhite@... | 10/20/05
Then that part was not mentioned...  John Zern | 10/20/05
Publishers have no control over this  voska | 10/20/05
Thats true. Anybody could buy the book...  John Zern | 10/20/05
Next: Search CD & DVD  joemartn | 10/19/05
Isn't that already available for cd's?  tic swayback | 10/19/05
Welcome to the big time  John Zern | 10/19/05
Then Why Was BnetD Sued  Ed_Meyers | 10/19/05
Lawsuits against Google Print Search interfere with research  johnfwilhite@... | 10/20/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads