On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Declan McCullagh
Posted on ZDNet News: Nov 5, 2005 1:58:00 AM

According to a new proposal being considered by a suburb of New York City, any business or home office with an open wireless connection but no separate server to fend off Internet attacks would be violating the law.

Politicians in Westchester County are urging adoption of the law--which appears to be the first such legislation in the U.S.--because without it, "somebody parked in the street or sitting in a neighboring building could hack into the network and steal your most confidential data," County Executive Andy Spano said in a statement.

The draft proposal offered this week would compel all "commercial businesses" with an open wireless access point to have a "network gateway server" outfitted with a software or hardware firewall. Such a firewall, used to block intrusions from outside the local network, would be required even for a coffee shop that used an old-fashioned cash register instead of an Internet-linked credit card system that could be vulnerable to intrusions.

Scott Fernqvist, special assistant to the county's chief information officer, said Friday that he thought "the law would apply" to home offices as well.

"It was just introduced; it's a draft," Fernqvist said. "We're hoping it's enacted early next year, but this can change."

The proposed law has two prongs: First, "public Internet access" may not be provided without a network gateway server equipped with a firewall. Second, any business or home office that stores personal information also must install such a firewall-outfitted server even if its wireless connection is encrypted and not open to the public. All such businesses would be required to register with the county within 90 days.

The proposal echoes a slew of bills in Congress and in state legislatures that are being considered in the wake of recent security problems involving Bank of America, payroll provider PayMaxx and Reed Elsevier Group's LexisNexis service. But the other proposals tend to follow approaches such as requiring notification of breaches or restricting use of Social Security Numbers--as opposed to regulating wireless links.

According to the Westchester proposal, public Internet access sites also would have to post a sign saying: "You are accessing a network which has been secured with firewall protection. Since such protection does not guarantee the security of your personal information, use discretion." Violations of any part of the law would be punishable with fines of $250 or $500.

Representatives from the county's information technology department drove around downtown White Plains, N.Y., with laptop computers and detected 248 open wireless connections in less than half an hour, the county reported. Half lacked "visible security" features.

According to a new proposal being considered by a suburb of New York City, any business or home office with an open wireless connection but no separate server to fend off Internet attacks would be violating the law.

Politicians in Westchester County are urging adoption of the law--which appears to be the first such legislation in the U.S.--because without it, "somebody parked in the street or sitting in a neighboring building could hack into the network and steal your most confidential data," County Executive Andy Spano said in a statement.

The draft proposal offered this week would compel all "commercial businesses" with an open wireless access point to have a "network gateway server" outfitted with a software or hardware firewall. Such a firewall, used to block intrusions from outside the local network, would be required even for a coffee shop that used an old-fashioned cash register instead of an Internet-linked credit card system that could be vulnerable to intrusions.

Scott Fernqvist, special assistant to the county's chief information officer, said Friday that he thought "the law would apply" to home offices as well.

"It was just introduced; it's a draft," Fernqvist said. "We're hoping it's enacted early next year, but this can change."

The proposed law has two prongs: First, "public Internet access" may not be provided without a network gateway server equipped with a firewall. Second, any business or home office that stores personal information also must install such a firewall-outfitted server even if its wireless connection is encrypted and not open to the public. All such businesses would be required to register with the county within 90 days.

The proposal echoes a slew of bills in Congress and in state legislatures that are being considered in the wake of recent security problems involving Bank of America, payroll provider PayMaxx and Reed Elsevier Group's LexisNexis service. But the other proposals tend to follow approaches such as requiring notification of breaches or restricting use of Social Security Numbers--as opposed to regulating wireless links.

According to the Westchester proposal, public Internet access sites also would have to post a sign saying: "You are accessing a network which has been secured with firewall protection. Since such protection does not guarantee the security of your personal information, use discretion." Violations of any part of the law would be punishable with fines of $250 or $500.

Representatives from the county's information technology department drove around downtown White Plains, N.Y., with laptop computers and detected 248 open wireless connections in less than half an hour, the county reported. Half lacked "visible security" features.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 27 Talkback(s)
From the CE's Office...
Immediate corrections that need to be made to the CNET News.com article:

*The law would not apply to generic "home offices" that do not also classify as commercial bussinesses, as defined in th... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Scott24_z Posted on: 11/09/05 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Is this even technically correct?  Mike Cox | 11/04/05
You have to consider  bjbrock | 11/05/05
Additional Firewall  fyao | 11/07/05
Whoa a little too much  rmcferren | 11/05/05
How Are They Going To Enforce This  Edward Meyers | 11/05/05
RFID Chips! Thats how!  Zofo_z | 11/05/05
Driving around with a laptop?  Anton Philidor | 11/07/05
Raise Fee's, Not Taxes, BS  NotRichandFamous | 11/05/05
Just wondering  Net-Tech_z | 11/05/05
The County's point IS ???????????????  Betelgeuse58 | 11/05/05
Are they going to apply this to owners of  Betelgeuse58 | 11/05/05
Not that I even agree with the law, but...  toadlife | 11/05/05
What business is it of theirs?  yyuko@... | 11/05/05
They should also make it illegal...  StinkyCheeseMan | 11/06/05
RE: They should also make it illegal... by StinkyCheeseMan  btljooz | 11/07/05
Everybody is going to be an Netowrk Security Expert  harmanhl | 11/06/05
They should also make it illegal...  StinkyCheeseMan | 11/06/05
What is this, China?  BitTwiddler | 11/07/05
The cynic in me...  BitTwiddler | 11/07/05
If I wanna let people on my network...  tiedyeguy64 | 11/07/05
It's a new compliance tax on small business  cafurey | 11/07/05
Why it might be NY's business  dropd | 11/07/05
Every single democracy is now an enemy of the republic...  voice_of_all_reason | 11/07/05
penalize the consumer for dumb product design?  arg_z | 11/08/05
What comes next...  Taz_z | 11/08/05
Also,  Taz_z | 11/08/05
From the CE's Office...  Scott24_z | 11/09/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Enterprise Applications

  • Check out some of the easiest and most powerful ways to boost productivity while saving money on your application infrastructure. See ZDNet's comprehensive Enterprise Application resource center, now!
  • New Online Dashboard
  • Read about top issues IT decision-makers face every day, plus get cost effective solutions to real life IT problems. Oracle Topline