On mySimon: Skullcandy Hesh Headphones
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Elinor Mills
Posted on ZDNet News: Nov 30, 2007 2:41:00 PM

There may just be a Google phone after all.

Google said on Friday it would apply to bid in the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's auction of 700 megahertz band wireless spectrum.

If it wins, it could build a wireless network for that spectrum on its own, or partner with others to build and operate such a network. Either way, Google could put its brand on millions of mobile devices that use the network. It would also be able to control the Internet experience on the devices and how much people would pay--or not pay--for the services.

In essence, Google could control the direction of the next-generation wireless network.

"Imagine an iPhone where the whole thing is a screen and the bottom eighth is banner ads running across," said Iain Gillott, a wireless analyst at IGR. "Spectrum is king; you own everything."

The 700MHz spectrum, which has been used to provide analog TV service, travels far and penetrates walls. As a result, it's considered the last remaining chunk of attractive wireless airwaves and is viewed as an opportunity to expand the Internet to a new frontier. The spectrum auction is scheduled to begin on January 24, and the deadline to apply to participate is Monday.

Google and other Internet companies have been hampered in their ability to expand their markets into the wireless space because carriers have had such a tight hold on the cellular industry. Right now, U.S. consumers are locked into the handset they use, the network it operates on, and the software it runs.

"Imagine an iPhone where the whole thing is a screen and the bottom eighth is banner ads running across. Spectrum is king; you own everything."
--Iain Gillott, IGR wireless analyst

This situation has crippled consumers' ability to use the Internet on their mobile devices, compared to how they use it on their PCs. Google executives say their aim is to bring the PC-style of Internet openness to the mobile world so that users have more choice in mobile services and applications, as well as price.

Google was instrumental in getting the FCC to adopt so-called "open access rules" that would ensure consumers could use any mobile device they choose on a large chunk of the 700MHz spectrum.

Profit motivates


While Google's entrance is likely to turn the wireless world upside-down, market disruption is not its motivation. Google's priority as a public company is to make a profit; having a Google-branded wireless service would attract a good deal more eyeballs to its ad-based services.

And mobile, in some ways, will be particularly fruitful for advertising. Owning the spectrum would give Google an advantage in local advertising, which is tailor-made for mobile use as people look for nearby restaurants, gas stations, or copy shops.

Conquering the mobile world would also give Google a boost in international markets, where people tend to be even more dependent on their mobile phones than they are in the U.S.

Google has managed to turn Web search into an $11 billion business on PCs by selling simple text ads that appear with search results. Imagine how lucrative that market will be when the ads, including local advertising, can get to the far reaches of the world where there aren't any PCs.

Right now the global PC search market generates about $20 billion in revenue, assuming each PC owner conducts an estimated 35 searches a month, according to Citigroup research. If they do just one search per month on the four billion mobile phones expected to be in use in 2010, they could generate $2.3 billion in revenue, assuming PC search advertising economics migrate as-is to the wireless world, Citigroup said in a report this week.

For Google, that could translate into $700 million in incremental revenue in 2010, according to Citigroup. A new network on the spectrum isn't expected until 2010 at the earliest, analysts say.

"If you can get the most attractive demographic, the 18- to 30-year-olds (who have grown up on Google), then advertisers will be lining up at the door," Gillott said.

The wireless spectrum bid dovetails nicely with Google's moves to unify handset makers, software developers, and carriers on Android, an open mobile platform.

Mobile isn't the only place Google is eyeing the wireless access business. The company is dabbling in Wi-Fi-based services for PCs, building its own free wireless network in its hometown of Mountain View, Calif. It had also partnered with network provider EarthLink on a proposal for San Francisco. Despite initial support from city officials, the approval process stalled and EarthLink backed out in August amid a company restructuring and significant layoffs.

"Google is spending time and money paving this new superhighway," said Jeff Kagan, a wireless and telecommunications analyst. "Google is creating the world they want to compete in because it doesn't exist for them right now."

A Google representative said no executives were available to comment on their spectrum plans or motivation.

Even if Google doesn't win, its actions have already shaken up the stagnant mobile industry, said Derek Brown, an analyst at Cantor Fitzgerald.

For Google, "there is a risk that they get in way over their heads in a field in which they are late to the party and in which they have no expertise," he said. "But history suggests Google has made some very good strategic, operational, and financial decisions and seems to have done as good or better a job at investing toward the future than many other similar companies."

©2007 CNET Networks, Inc. All rights reserved. CNET , CNET.com , and the CNET logo are registered trademarks of CNET Networks, Inc. Used by permission.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 66 Talkback(s)
Infrastructure
If they are smart about it, they can split the costs with local governments (that means your tax dollars), and make money on the devices bought by you and I.

Infrastructure is not an issue. (Read the rest)
Posted by: Uralbas Posted on: 12/04/07 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Infrastructure game will suck up all Google's cash  idealab | 11/30/07
You forget that Google can sell stock, and has billions from on-going  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
Google can handle this! It will take years to build out the network, but,  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
They shouldn't have to bid  GuidingLight | 12/01/07
You forget that Google is the ONLY bidder that will not try to maximize the  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
Put down the Kool-Aid  GuidingLight | 12/01/07
Ok, tell me how Sprint, Verizon, T-Mobile will profit other than by  DonnieBoy | 12/02/07
Build their own network?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/07
Google has the finances. They can raise whatever necessary by selling stock  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
Its obvious you have no clue what that  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/07
Since you are claiming to know, exactly how much would it cost?  B.O.F.H. | 12/01/07
Ok, since you are the "expert", tell us what it would cost to build out  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
Ok, lets look at just ONE city  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/07
The other carriers rent towers too, and an upgrage means that you have to  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
Huh???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/07
You do not understand. The carriers do not typically own the towers, they  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
Ummm, no. In most cases one carrier  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/07
In any case, the tower business is competitive, and it would be illegal to  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
Do not forget  GuidingLight | 12/01/07
Google does NOT really care how people get the wireless internet, just that  DonnieBoy | 12/02/07
Also keep in mind, stockholders  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/07
Stock holders do NOT care about long term ROI since the value is reflected  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
Buwahahaha  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/07
I guess you are out of arguments.  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
How do you argue when one guy says investors  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/07
investors care about ROI, but the fact that it might be long term is NOT  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
Given Googles market value and trading prices...  B.O.F.H. | 12/01/07
It appears that he really is that stupid.  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
But you're smart, right DB?  GuidingLight | 12/01/07
Plus, I almost forgot, DB  GuidingLight | 12/01/07
This is only about whether or not Google can easily raise the money to  DonnieBoy | 12/02/07
So what?  GuidingLight | 12/02/07
Still, Google has been going nowhere but up for a number of years, and they  DonnieBoy | 12/02/07
Or it could go down into history  GuidingLight | 12/03/07
You can bet that Google will have a FREE low-bandwidth service with  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
Nothing is free, Google will be king of Spam if  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/07
There will be packages for everybody. You will be able to pay a hefty fee  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
A hefty fee. Oh yeah, like we already have.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/07
Right now, you pay a hefty fee for bandwidth through an eyedropper. In the  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
RE: Google versus the telecoms  Loverock Davidson | 12/01/07
"Free" is a powerful word.  justwondering | 12/01/07
Agreed  GuidingLight | 12/02/07
Consumers are turning their backs on Google?  mattnico | 12/02/07
Come on guys, take a step back and realize the value of a nation-wide  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
DB, get off it. Dude, its not going to happen  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/01/07
Re: DB, get off it...Dude...  harrisharris | 12/01/07
Just wondering . . .  justwondering | 12/01/07
Amen  harrisharris | 12/03/07
Also, try to guess at least one other company that could make billions from  DonnieBoy | 12/01/07
Google phone will be free for awhile.  osreinstall | 12/02/07
On-line advertising pays pretty well, actually!  B.O.F.H. | 12/02/07
Not what I was getting at.  osreinstall | 12/02/07
osreinstall, you are an idiot!  B.O.F.H. | 12/02/07
You are a bigger one.  osreinstall | 12/02/07
You are hiding behind the Constitution for your stupidity?  B.O.F.H. | 12/02/07
You are giving up the Constitution because of your stupidity.  osreinstall | 12/02/07
Do you have the same fear for Microsoft as for Google?  B.O.F.H. | 12/02/07
Not really. But I don't trust them either with personal data.  osreinstall | 12/02/07
Man, leave China out of this, this spectrum we are talking about is in the  DonnieBoy | 12/02/07
Yes leave out the negatives so it will go to $900  osreinstall | 12/02/07
Don't worry, there will be plenty of pay plans, and Google will  DonnieBoy | 12/03/07
What hysteria? You mean my skeptism.  osreinstall | 12/03/07
Definitely hysterical if you think that Google does not value the trust of  DonnieBoy | 12/03/07
No where near as hysterical when you rant about MS.  osreinstall | 12/03/07
Why this will not happen.  James T. Kirk | 12/03/07
Infrastructure  Uralbas | 12/04/07

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and