On CBSSports.com: Centerfold hotties make their NFL picks
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ben Charny
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 6, 2005 6:54:00 PM

A tepid version of strip poker for cell phones has debuted in the United States, and while there's no nudity--on the screen, at least--the game's distributor is preparing for complaints that it stretches the boundaries of good taste.

New York-based wireless-game provider ThumbPlay said players first download the game onto their cell phones for a fee of $4, then play against a virtual female opponent. The game's most controversial feature allows even a player who loses, for 99 cents (each time), to click a "cheat" button that lets him or her--OK, him--buy garments off the virtual opponent. Losing players get to watch their virtual opponents change outfits.

AT&T Wireless, now part of Cingular Wireless, has been offering the game. The game is downloaded using a version of Java for small devices available on most cell phones. Additional U.S. operators are expected to join the fray soon, ThumbPlay representative Chris Pfaff said. Cingular Wireless already sells a version of what it calls "Sexy Poker 2004" for the same price, and which shares many of the same characteristics--but not the stripping--as the ThumbPlay game. However, the game is not from ThumbPlay, according to Cingular Wireless spokesman Clay Owen.

Pfaff said the company is readying itself for a storm of indecency complaints. The U.S. version has been "toned down" from the one now available in Europe, where the virtual models are nude, due to more conservative U.S. attitudes towards nudity.

The U.S. version is "about as racy as a lingerie ad," Pfaff said.

The game isn't the first to push the envelope on good taste. Playboy Enterprises, in conjunction with wireless content distributor Dwango Wireless, plans to soon sell adult mobile-phone content in the United States and Canada for the first time this year.

Representatives of the Federal Communications Commission and Chairman Michael Powell, which has made indecency a priority topic of his tenure, didn't have an immediate comment.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 22 Talkback(s)
Moralists, not thinkers
Roger,

There are at least two distinct groups that you confuse with this kind of statement. One is like many of my reletives, who given half an opportunity would legislate your behavior for "y... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Mack DaNife Posted on: 01/07/05 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
What complaint's Squawkbox   | 01/06/05
I agree d_jedi   | 01/06/05
Which for me was a pleasant surprise..heh heh heh Laff   | 01/06/05
Which is precisely why.. Jeff Spicoli   | 01/06/05
Now how long will it take ZDNet to take this down Jeff? Laff   | 01/06/05
Hopefully they won't Jeff Spicoli   | 01/06/05
Wheres the emoticons? Roger Ramjet   | 01/07/05
LOTS of people to "abolish" Roger Ramjet   | 01/07/05
Moral thinkers Roger Ramjet   | 01/07/05
Moralists, not thinkers Mack DaNife   | 01/07/05
Re: Surprise Mack DaNife   | 01/07/05
toned down? B.O.F.H.   | 01/06/05
What?!?!! Squawkbox   | 01/06/05
I think you misread what I wrote! B.O.F.H.   | 01/06/05
OK I stand corrected Squawkbox   | 01/06/05
Talking about prostitutes and you say "I stand corrected" Laff   | 01/06/05
You caught that did you? (NT) Squawkbox   | 01/06/05
At attention my one-eyed friend! Jeff Spicoli   | 01/06/05
I read industry news, among other sources. B.O.F.H.   | 01/06/05
OK but I still say so what? Squawkbox   | 01/06/05
that's it, reporting you now old man Monkey_MCSE   | 01/06/05
Hey Monkey_MCSE Squawkbox   | 01/06/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

Fusion

advertisement
Click Here