On GameSpot: We try Create mode in LittleBigPlanet
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Martin LaMonica, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 18, 2006 7:55:00 PM

CAMBRIDGE, Mass.--The new version of the most widely used open-source license takes a "highly aggressive" stance against the digital rights management software that's widely favored in the entertainment industry, said Eben Moglen, general counsel for the Free Software Foundation.

At a two-day event here to launch the General Public License version 3, which governs use of countless free and open-source programs, Moglen said the license includes anti-DRM provisions that could put it in conflict with movie studios and even digital video recorder maker TiVo.

Eben Moglen
Eben Moglen
Free Software Foundation

On Monday, the Free Software Foundation published a draft of the GPL version 3, which is expected to be completed in about a year. The draft states that GPL software cannot use "digital restrictions" on copyright material unless users can control them.

Moglen said that DRM technology, which places limits on how consumers can play movies, music or other digital content, is "fundamentally incompatible" with the principles of the Free Software Foundation. Moglen and Free Software Foundation founder Richard Stallman are co-authors of the GPL version 3.

"Mr. Stallman made perfectly clear that his point of view is: It's enough. It's enough that the world has to pay attention to that (DRM) problem the way the world needed to pay attention to the patent problem 10 years ago," Moglen said in an interview with CNET News.com.

"I recognize that that's a highly aggressive position, but it's not an aggression which we thought up. It's a defense related to an aggression which was launched against the people whose rights are our primary concern," he added.

newsmaker
Defender of the GPL
For a more extensive Q&A with Eben Moglen, click here.

Moglen said DRM systems that take control out of people's hands or violate their privacy do not respect free software users' rights and therefore are in conflict with the forthcoming GPL provisions.

The planned anti-DRM changes to the GPL are significant because the entertainment industry regularly uses Linux-powered computers in the production process, notably for special effects and animation. In general, movie studios support DRM technology to prevent piracy.

It's not clear whether the Linux operating system kernel will be governed by version 3 of the GPL when the new license is released; creator Linus Torvalds specifically didn't follow the Free Software Foundation's recommendation to describe a software project as governed by version 2 or "any later version." However, many other components of the operating system, such as the GLIBC library of supporting software and the GCC compiler, are expected to move to GPL 3.

Moglen and Stallman have voiced concern specifically with TiVo, which uses Linux, because the company collects information on consumers' actions. Moglen said TiVo complied with version 2 of the GPL "by the skin of its teeth" and said the company will find more difficulty complying with GPL version 3's anti-DRM provisions.

"Having a personal video recorder which reports every button you push to headquarters when you use the remote control--and which won't run software if you modify the box so it snoops on you a little less--is not user-respecting conduct," he said.

"What TiVo needs to do--what everybody needs to do who makes electronic devices--is to stop injuring users to help movie companies. We don't want our software used in a way which batters the head of the user to please somebody else. Our goal is the protection of users' rights, not movies' rights," Moglen said.

He said Hollywood studios that use free software, namely Linux, to create animated movies yet deny users' freedoms are "flat unfair."

Separately, Moglen sought to allay concerns that the GPL version 3 requires application hosting companies to provide the source code for software delivered as a service over the Internet.

"It is clear that in this draft we have not changed those rules at all," he said.

CNET News.com's Stephen Shankland contributed to this report.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 76 Talkback(s)
Nor give it away ...
5) You cannot sell the song or profit from it monetarily in any way, that is the rights of the copywrite holder.

Nor are you allowed to give it away without making a profit ...... (Read the rest)
Posted by: __howard__ Posted on: 01/24/06 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
New Linux license takes aim at DRM and Hollywood Loverock Davidson   | 01/18/06
Rockhead, "tongue in cheek" is NOT the same ... Judas I.   | 01/18/06
You realize of course that... #_z   | 01/18/06
Linus will just use the existing GPL... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 01/18/06
Liar! Oh...the "L" word. Or wait...that's "Loverock"! techboy_z   | 01/18/06
Why the insults? Can think of a real comment? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 01/18/06
You realize.... Shelendrea   | 01/18/06
Isn't that sad??? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 01/19/06
In order to be worthy of a REAL comment ... Judas I.   | 01/19/06
He is what he is. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 01/19/06
true Shelendrea   | 01/19/06
Oh, now THAT'S rich. Judas I.   | 01/19/06
Knock it off Shelendrea   | 01/19/06
You must be new around here. Judas I.   | 01/19/06
Oh this is getting good Shelendrea   | 01/19/06
Yep, gittin' really good, we're makin' progress, Shelendrea. Judas I.   | 01/19/06
Trouble is, DRM has good uses A.Sinic   | 01/20/06
Good uses? jgoecks@...   | 01/20/06
No, Linus said that... Tony Agudo   | 01/18/06
An odd statement. Anton Philidor   | 01/18/06
RE: Edward Meyers   | 01/18/06
Also tricky. Anton Philidor   | 01/18/06
A Good Chunk Edward Meyers   | 01/18/06
It Apears to be Aimed More At Edward Meyers   | 01/18/06
Another 10 year block of our lives... John Le'Brecage   | 01/19/06
DRM in the studio... A.Sinic   | 01/20/06
Funny how none of those security measures mustangj36@...   | 01/21/06
DRM and GPL3 hipparchus2001   | 01/18/06
Then it wouldn't be DRM anymore Tony Agudo   | 01/18/06
remote DRM? __howard__   | 01/18/06
Does Hollywood have to abandon Linux... Anton Philidor   | 01/18/06
Mr Stallman v. Mr Gates/Ballmer mdsmedia   | 01/19/06
DRM (actually TPM) and GPL3 krehbiel   | 01/19/06
Malware Writters Will Just Sign The Code Edward Meyers   | 01/19/06
Malware Writters Can't Just Sign The Code krehbiel   | 01/19/06
Oh well, knew it was coming Boot_Agnostic   | 01/19/06
This article is 100% FUD krehbiel   | 01/19/06
And that's why DRM doesn't work voska   | 01/19/06
Big win for Microsoft CE and sad day for PMPs wa1gon   | 01/19/06
TiVo USES Linux Roger Ramjet   | 01/19/06
Change to Windows I suppose. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 01/19/06
If it came down to it Loverock Davidson   | 01/19/06
linux reference is more than kernel.. bigger than Tivo john.gruber@...   | 01/19/06
Hmm... thetargos   | 01/19/06
Bad headline John L. Ries   | 01/19/06
So much nothing chat about a license to use Copyrighted works. B.O.F.H.   | 01/19/06
So I pose a serious question. When does it end? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 01/19/06
A License is a contract, a copyright is different Physco Dude   | 01/19/06
I am presuming that you are versed in Copyright Law by now. B.O.F.H.   | 01/19/06
DMCA and DRM Question? alricsca   | 01/19/06
GPL or any future version... krehbiel   | 01/19/06
DRM is NOT A BAD THING! RMD   | 01/19/06
You must be new to DRM to say that Tony Agudo   | 01/19/06
Yes! TimeBomb   | 01/19/06
Thanks! Tony Agudo   | 01/20/06
GREAT post Rafterman ;) btljooz   | 01/20/06
I'm not a Windows user but... Tony Agudo   | 01/21/06
You have a point, but... Physco Dude   | 01/19/06
Sell what? The song is not the product, a ticket to a show is a product!!! xunil skcor   | 01/19/06
huh????? Shelendrea   | 01/19/06
Legally, you're probably not "buying" the song __howard__   | 01/19/06
Your not buying the song or any "license" either. xunil skcor   | 01/20/06
Nor give it away ... __howard__   | 01/24/06
so............. Shelendrea   | 01/19/06
iTunes TimeBomb   | 01/19/06
It really isn't a bad thing. Just FUD on overtime. osreinstall   | 01/21/06
People! GPL software does not mean you have to run GPL sofwatre on it.... Physco Dude   | 01/19/06
GO Stallman!!! This is great news for open software!!! xunil skcor   | 01/19/06
Obutterball Shelendrea   | 01/19/06
Perfect sense to me, Shelendrea. Judas I.   | 01/19/06
Uncle Uncle! Shelendrea   | 01/19/06
Just ignore DRM Mectron   | 01/20/06
DRM is not just for Movies and Music A.Sinic   | 01/20/06
RE: DRM is not just for Movies and Music by A.Sinic btljooz   | 01/20/06
RE: Just ignore DRM by Mectron btljooz   | 01/20/06
Linux aims at DRM and Hollywood> GOOD!!!! btljooz   | 01/20/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
Try It Free

Whitepapers & Webcasts

advertisement
Click Here