On The Insider: Sexy Aussie Babes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Declan McCullagh, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Sep 2, 2005 11:47:00 AM

A federal appeals court has ruled that computer programmers do not have the right to reverse-engineer Blizzard Entertainment's video games to improve their playability.

The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis ruled Thursday that federal law--specifically, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act--disallows players from altering Blizzard games to link with servers other than the company's official Battle.net site.

Affected games published by Blizzard, a division of Vivendi Universal, include titles in its "Diablo," "Starcraft" and "Warcraft" lines.

In a 3-0 decision, the court upheld a trial judge's ruling from October, concluding the programmers' "circumvention in this case constitutes infringement."

The DMCA broadly restricts circumventing, or bypassing, antipiracy measures. Blizzard had included such measures to tie its games to the Battle.net site and detect pirated copies.

The defendants in the case, Ross Combs and Rob Crittenden, reverse-engineered the Blizzard protocol using tools like "tcpdump" to listen to the software's communications with a game server. Eventually, their "bnetd" project let Blizzard games connect with unofficial servers, yielding benefits like faster response times.

The 8th Circuit also cited a contractual agreement that Combs and Crittenden OK'd when installing Blizzard software. That agreement prohibits reverse-engineering.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 23 Talkback(s)
Seems to me your choices are:
1. Play the game the way the manufacture designed it.

2. Don't play the game. (Read the rest)
Posted by: No_Ax_to_Grind Posted on: 09/04/05 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Why do they care thk123   | 09/02/05
they're redirecting traffic . . . tmurph1810   | 09/02/05
I'd have to disagree el1jones   | 09/02/05
Read the case first, you would be surprised quietLee   | 09/02/05
so what? rafe01   | 09/02/05
but, did they identify themselves as being associated with blizzard? engrmerc   | 09/02/05
Because they collect a fee ... ShadeTree   | 09/02/05
Who collects a fee? quietLee   | 09/02/05
Understandable opensourcepro   | 09/02/05
why? rafe01   | 09/02/05
Biting the hand that feeds me ???? mrlinux   | 09/02/05
Extremely unlikely! ShadeTree   | 09/02/05
Only one game... thetargos   | 09/02/05
"Free" Font   | 09/02/05
Indeed Anti_Zealot   | 09/02/05
What's the difference? bad2thebone_z   | 09/02/05
What was left out of the story IS the difference quietLee   | 09/02/05
Olive branch? Font   | 09/02/05
Don't play video games but... JJ Brannon   | 09/02/05
Class action anyone???? Dazza_z   | 09/02/05
Wishes only come true in fairy tales John Zern   | 09/03/05
I didn't agree to being cheated. Dazza_z   | 09/04/05
Seems to me your choices are: No_Ax_to_Grind   | 09/04/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

Ultraportables

advertisement
Click Here