On GameSpot: Updated hands-on with Ninja Gaiden II
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Tom Krazit, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Aug 23, 2006 9:59:00 PM

Apple Computer and Creative Technology have agreed to settle their legal dispute over music player patents for $100 million, the companies announced Wednesday.

The $100 million, to be paid by Apple, grants Apple a license to a Creative patent for the hierarchical user interface used in that company's Zen music players. After months of hinting that it would be coming after rival music player companies, Creative sued Apple in May, claiming the iPod maker was infringing on its patents.

A week later, Apple countersued, claiming Creative was infringing on Apple patents for user interfaces. As a result of the settlement, all legal disputes between the two companies related to the patent will disappear. Creative had also asked the International Trade Commission to investigate Apple for patent infringement.

The patent covers an interface that lets users navigate through a tree of expanding options, such as selecting an artist, then a particular album by that artist, then a specific song from that album, said Phil O'Shaughnessy, a Creative spokesman. The patent applies to portable media players, which includes devices like the iPod or cell phones that have the ability to play music, he said. Creative filed for the patent on Jan. 5, 2001.

Apple can get back some of the $100 million payment if Creative is able to secure licensing deals with other MP3 player manufacturers, said Steve Dowling, an Apple spokesman. He declined to specify exactly how much Apple could recoup or how many deals it would take to trigger the payments.

Under U.S. patent law, the first inventor to file a patent generally holds the rights to that technology, said Rod Thompson, an intellectual property lawyer with Farella Braun and Martell in San Francisco. This isn't always the case, as another inventor can attempt to prove that they were working on the invention before the other inventor filed for a patent, but that's a long, expensive legal process with no certainties, he said.

"This had the makings of a big battle, because the stakes are so high," Thompson said. Apple obviously couldn't afford to have an injunction slapped on imports of the iPod, and $100 million is a pittance compared to the $1.5 billion in revenue Apple garnered on iPod sales just in the last quarter, he said.

"Creative is very fortunate to have been granted this early patent," Apple's CEO Steve Jobs said in a press release. Apple was eager to move beyond the legal dispute caused by the patent, which could have eventually cost the company as much as the $100 million settlement amount, Dowling said.

"We're very pleased to have reached a broad agreement with Apple," O'Shaughnessy said. Creative plans to speak with other MP3 player companies about its patent, he said, but is not providing details on whether it has entered discussions with other companies.

As part of the agreement, Creative will also enter Apple's Made for iPod program as an authorized seller of iPod accessories. Creative will be able to affix the "Made for iPod" logo to its speakers, headphones and other related products, O'Shaughnessy said.

Creative is one of many companies attempting to chip away at Apple's runaway lead in the market for portable MP3 players. Its Zen products haven't translated into profits, however: Earlier this month, Creative reported a $12.7 million loss on slowing sales for its fourth quarter. The company expects the $100 million settlement to add 85 cents to its earnings per share figures for its current quarter.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 86 Talkback(s)
The only problem with an unlocked phone...
is that the carriers can easily lock down their network from using the phone. While it's unlikely that Cingular or T-Mobile won't, Verizon and Sprint make too much money from their online media services to lose the revenue to Apple.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: nix_hed Posted on: 08/29/06 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
probably wouldn't have happened but.... JoeMama_z   | 08/23/06
AAC or Fairplay? tic swayback   | 08/24/06
damn right! JoeMama_z   | 08/24/06
Apple... bgonetoo   | 08/23/06
Awwww, does big bad Apple scare widdle bgonetoo? BitTwiddler   | 08/24/06
Did they really get a black eye? dave95.   | 08/24/06
They are not "going after" other companies John Zern   | 08/24/06
Not the whole interface tic swayback   | 08/24/06
Where is everyone? mdemuth   | 08/23/06
Here I am Len Rooney   | 08/24/06
No winners, No losers...... linux for me   | 08/24/06
Well Len Rooney   | 08/24/06
How would that get Apple any money?(nt) ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
It's part of the settlement dave95.   | 08/24/06
No they won't Boot_Agnostic   | 08/24/06
Less than thrilled with this settlement tic swayback   | 08/24/06
Every company says they settled ... ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
Do you think this is a good patent? tic swayback   | 08/24/06
Whether you agree or disagree .... ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
Expensive is the key tic swayback   | 08/24/06
Depends on "IF" and I did say "IF" Creative could count Laff   | 08/24/06
Maybe they felt it would put their scrollwheel patent Boot_Agnostic   | 08/24/06
Legal Fees Patrick Jones   | 08/24/06
Just because Apple Paid, doesn't mean Creative is right... BitTwiddler   | 08/24/06
Doesn't make Creative ... ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
Apple's counter suit? dave95.   | 08/24/06
Interesting spin but ... ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
Ummm....I would call this a tie... nomorems   | 08/24/06
Of course you would! ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
because doh123   | 08/24/06
Grow up. ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
Nor no end to what Microsoft fans will say to disparge anything not MS (NT) nomorems   | 08/24/06
How was that disparaging to Apple? ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
No precedent since it was never tried. It was settled. (NT) nomorems   | 08/24/06
There absolutely was a precedent set. ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
Not a legal precendent so no worries (NT) nomorems   | 08/25/06
I missed/missing something LibrarianDude   | 08/23/06
patent for a hierarchical tree view of info? M$ and Unix should have shot wessonjoe   | 08/24/06
Yes, i agree.. this patent stuff, especially over stuff like this, stupid Been_Done_Before   | 08/24/06
MacCentrics......... bgonetoo   | 08/23/06
Well I guess I'm a MacCentric though I prefer fantic if you please:) Laff   | 08/24/06
The $100 million is just the settlement. ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
I don't think so tic swayback   | 08/24/06
It also allow Creative to put made for ... ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
Hehehe dave95.   | 08/24/06
How many accessories? John Zern   | 08/24/06
That translates into more profits for Apple tic swayback   | 08/24/06
If you belive people buy iPODs because ... ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
I may not know alot about marketing but before one Laff   | 08/24/06
Business lesson tic swayback   | 08/24/06
Go back to school! ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
Can't agree Shade tic swayback   | 08/24/06
Tic, your still wrong!!! ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
My point exactly tic swayback   | 08/24/06
People don't buy the iPod for accessories... nomorems   | 08/24/06
I bought one for the accessories tic swayback   | 08/25/06
Wrong MacGeek2121   | 08/28/06
I'm gonna patent breathing! Reverend MacFellow   | 08/24/06
It must be crushing ... ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
That was lame Rick_K   | 08/24/06
actually, US law is who created first.... doh123   | 08/24/06
Then why? Rick_K   | 08/25/06
Patent Review Process tic swayback   | 08/25/06
Sounds about right... Rick_K   | 08/25/06
Was this specific part of the iPod/iTunes combo considered Laff   | 08/24/06
Patent system is Broken dwjunix   | 08/24/06
Better news for Apple tic swayback   | 08/24/06
DELL = Uncool dave95.   | 08/24/06
And that is germane in what way? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 08/24/06
Same market, competition is failing tic swayback   | 08/24/06
I think it's Dutche or Frenche nomorems   | 08/25/06
I miss my Dell DJ Gen 1 Boot_Agnostic   | 08/24/06
Ironic that something called an iRiver would have problems Laff   | 08/24/06
Beauty in the eye of the beholder Boot_Agnostic   | 08/24/06
Yeah I got a clear protective case for my Black Video iPod. Laff   | 08/24/06
Hey! My 1st generation iPod is still kicking! nomorems   | 08/24/06
That last part was a bit disparaging Boot_Agnostic   | 08/25/06
Creative's Apple settlement no help to Nomad listeners briagar   | 08/24/06
I don't get it.. nomorems   | 08/24/06
Kudos for Apple for not fighting the case out to the end MacGeek2121   | 08/28/06
Cell phones and not patents will be the iPod killer. ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
I agree here tic swayback   | 08/24/06
Apple can't break into the cell phone ... ShadeTree   | 08/24/06
That's what's going to be interesting here tic swayback   | 08/24/06
The only problem with an unlocked phone... nix_hed   | 08/29/06
I don't know... Rick_K   | 08/25/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

Whitepapers & Webcasts