On BNET: 5 freeware gems to use everyday
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Martin LaMonica, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Nov 17, 2003 3:35:00 PM

Microsoft on Monday said it will license the XML-based file formats used in the latest edition of its Office applications on a royalty-free basis.

The move is designed to give companies better access to documents that are created using Office 2003, the latest edition of Microsoft's desktop application suite. Microsoft said it is taking the action in response to requests from its software partners as well as from corporate and government customers who demanded a way to better interoperate with Microsoft's dominant suite of desktop applications.

The Redmond, Wash.-based company's Extensible Markup Language (XML) reference schemas for Excel, and the InfoPath forms application will be available starting Dec. 5. WordprocessingML for Word, the XML schema for Word, will be available online Monday.

Building XML data labeling technology into its Office applications is a critical underpinning for Office 2003, allowing the company to introduce advances around collaboration and digital rights management.


Get Up to Speed on...
Web services
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


With the licensing program, third-party companies or customers can incorporate the Office schemas into their own software and improve the interoperability with Office documents, according to Microsoft.

The Danish government is already using the XML schema in a project to standardize document formats to enable simpler data access. The initiative came about after discussions with the Danish government, Microsoft said.

Microsoft said it is using a World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) standard called XML Schema Definitions (XSDs) to publish the information. But unlike industry standards controlled by industry committees, Microsoft will dictate the development of the Office schema, noted Ron Schmelzer, an analyst at ZapThink.

"The challenge is that Microsoft is in control of the format, and so they retain control over the timing and nature of the changes to the format," said Schmelzer. "So any vendor that looks to support interoperability with Office 2003 will need to stay on their toes."

The move also allays some concerns expressed before Office 2003 was released that the XML-based Office file formats could only be read by Microsoft software. By publishing the schemas, third-party companies can now build software that will be able to read and write documents' Office 2003 file formats without a special add-on product.

"Fully opening up and licensing the Office 2003 schemas creates the first crack in the productivity suite's proprietary file formats," Jupiter Research analyst Joe Wilcox wrote in a Web log posting. "If data is truly is portable, as XML promises, then companies would no longer need to buy Office for compatibility of the file formats."

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 110 Talkback(s)
Put Up or Shut Up?
Put up or shut up? Ax:”Open source has been screaming, ranting, and whining that the ONLY reason people use MS Office is that they are locked in to it. With this move MS is calling their bluff,... (Read the rest)
Posted by: gary_edwards Posted on: 11/18/03 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
All that whining for nothing. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Not really... Patrick Jones   | 11/17/03
Did you read any of it? mikecel   | 11/17/03
Yep.. Patrick Jones   | 11/17/03
A second reading might be in order ... Still Lynn   | 11/18/03
Royalty-free licensing is common John Carroll  ZDNet | 11/18/03
Read the first paragraph again. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Most Zealotic Post of the Forum nucrash   | 11/17/03
So.. d_jedi   | 11/17/03
Good on ya! No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
But unlike industry standards controlled by industry committees, Microsoft Update victim   | 11/17/03
will dictate the development of the Office schema Update victim   | 11/17/03
Very Valid Whining nucrash   | 11/17/03
Lock-In tic swayback   | 11/17/03
Apple pschroeder@...   | 11/17/03
Here you go. Have fun. Yen_z   | 11/17/03
"Based on" pschroeder@...   | 11/17/03
Nice try, Don Yagotta B. Kidding   | 11/17/03
GPL incompatible Ardian Daka   | 11/17/03
You are right, Microsoft doesn't do GPL. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
In fact it cuts out commercial developers too... John Le'Brecage   | 11/17/03
Not when you buy a license. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Don't be disingenuous.... John Le'Brecage   | 11/17/03
Here is the license Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Umm... Sam... about that link. John Le'Brecage   | 11/17/03
Sorry - ZDNet won't let me reply directly to you Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
i don't get it.. ryusen   | 11/17/03
Yes, you got it. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
You are missing... neil ubich   | 11/17/03
Yes... and? Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
but ryusen   | 11/17/03
License pschroeder@...   | 11/18/03
Um, this is not a complete... BitTwiddler   | 11/17/03
To answer you. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Are you unfamiliar with MS Office? B.O.F.H.   | 11/17/03
Can lock users NOT system michael-t   | 11/17/03
Congratulations - you win the prize Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Dismal michael-t   | 11/17/03
And this is all relevant to XML because...? Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Yes, but tic swayback   | 11/17/03
My wife might take umbrage at that remark ;-) Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Still lock-in, or at least lock-out! John Le'Brecage   | 11/17/03
OO a competitive threat? Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Quoth from Microsoft... John Le'Brecage   | 11/17/03
Finally someone with a sense of humour :-) Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Document assembly KTLA   | 11/17/03
So what did they say? Cardinal_Bill   | 11/17/03
I missed your point. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
OK...try this then. Cardinal_Bill   | 11/17/03
I only see one group that can't use it. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Says who? Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Oh I agree, No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Lawyers - gotta love 'em :-) Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Too easily confused a bit can be nucrash   | 11/17/03
Yes, confused you are... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Oooh- keep smokine that stuff... Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Stop confusing him with truth and facts! No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
no kidding lmaxwell   | 11/18/03
FUD, FUD, FUD, FUD Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
More info Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Links. Cardinal_Bill   | 11/17/03
What's so hard to understand? d_jedi   | 11/17/03
Does it? Cardinal_Bill   | 11/17/03
It is there - just a bit confusing Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Explanation Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Sam, you can't show those that refuse to see. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Oh, we know and we see... John Le'Brecage   | 11/17/03
It's the ol' time religion... Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
John, you have me all wrong. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
How about partisan politics? John L. Ries   | 11/17/03
So whats new about this? Nigel Johnstone   | 11/17/03
I missed your point. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Nothing New - Same Old MS KeithRisler   | 11/17/03
XML... Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Non-Issues cont'd michael-t   | 11/17/03
Office 98? Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Buwahahahaha, good one! No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
There is a version for the PC voska   | 11/17/03
One would think that... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Depends if he is MAC user voska   | 11/18/03
Don't Panic michael-t   | 11/17/03
Chances are... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Classics michael-t   | 11/17/03
Only if I sent them to you. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Alas - that's the problem... Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Oooh - teach me more master... Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
ROFLMAO No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Remarkable Information michael-t   | 11/17/03
Where do you want to start? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Non-Answer (cont'd) michael-t   | 11/17/03
depends what you call useful or not Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Why this scares open source people. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
If they do neil ubich   | 11/17/03
You seem to be lost. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
I want to complain Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
RE: Why this scares open source people. Iain_Peters   | 11/17/03
You are right... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
MS only did this to "force" upgrading.. MeadMkr   | 11/18/03
Put Up or Shut Up? gary_edwards   | 11/18/03
But Once is Not Enough KeithRisler   | 11/17/03
Name even one. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Then don't use it... Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
But, but what will they have to whine about then. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
Nope - that IS the license Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
Is it going to be completely open? Iain_Peters   | 11/17/03
Name one for profit company doing it. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 11/17/03
SUN with StarOffice Iain_Peters   | 11/17/03
Really? Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03
What would they "whine" about? Iain_Peters   | 11/17/03
License link is NOW LIVE Sam_Lowry   | 11/17/03

What do you think?

advertisement
Click Here