On MovieTome: Read the CASTLEVANIA script review!
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 12, 2004 12:55:00 PM

Intel has gotten involved in the legal battle between the SCO Group and Linux, contributing money to a defense fund geared to protect users of the open-source operating system.

The Open Source Development Labs, an industry consortium that employs Linux leader Linus Torvalds, announced Monday that it is organizing the legal defense fund.

"It would be made available to some Linux customers that come under litigation from SCO," said the OSDL's executive director, Stuart Cohen. A subcommittee of the consortium's board of directors will decide how to allocate funds, he said.

Intel has been largely quiet in the legal case, but it and several other major computing companies are actively involved in the OSDL.

OSDL hopes to raise $10 million, Cohen said. So far it's raised $3 million from a group of companies that includes IBM, MontaVista Software and Intel.

The funding would be used to protect Linux users who are sued for Linux issues common across the industry, not for issues particular to that user or company, an OSDL representative said.

SCO, which claims to own several key Unix copyrights, argues that Unix software was illegally moved into Linux and is demanding that companies using Linux pay license fees or face legal action.

Linux uses interfaces that are covered by SCO's copyrights, SCO has argued. Thus, the use of Linux "constitutes a violation of the United States Copyright Act," the Lindon, Utah-based company has said. Legal experts have advised Linux users to see what comes of court cases before agreeing to any license deals, however.

SCO's legal actions so far have targeted IBM, though leading Linux seller Red Hat has brought a suit against SCO in return.

OSDL isn't the first to offer protective measures in the legal domain. Hewlett-Packard indemnifies its Linux customers against SCO Group actions. And Red Hat has begun a legal defense fund of its own for open-source programmers.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 54 Talkback(s)
To stuartevins--
Again, since you have made no real accusations, how is a company to defend itself? You say that corporate greed puts people out on the street and bankrupts them, all while the company turns a smiling... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Martin Marvinski Posted on: 01/13/04 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Linux is great news for Intel decourl   | 01/11/04
see Intel and MS arent in arms with each other. jimk_z   | 01/12/04
oops jimk_z   | 01/12/04
Agree..but Prognosticator   | 01/12/04
C'mon GRindinAxTaRupy   | 01/12/04
Wow... Martin Marvinski   | 01/12/04
Trolling? No, just telling it like it is... GRindinAxTaRupy   | 01/12/04
Yes... Martin Marvinski   | 01/12/04
We live in a global economy with MacGeek2121   | 01/13/04
To stuartevins-- Martin Marvinski   | 01/13/04
Basic business policy Prognosticator   | 01/12/04
To further illustrate your point... IT_User   | 01/12/04
I feel better! Yen_z   | 01/12/04
Well, no IT_User   | 01/12/04
B&J paradise Prognosticator   | 01/12/04
Does your "business policy" include flouting antitrust law? GRindinAxTaRupy   | 01/12/04
Corporations and Social Consciences? Da_Bobcee   | 01/12/04
No Bob GRindinAxTaRupy   | 01/12/04
Just get the court case done FilledOut   | 01/12/04
Would be nice but.... DarbyOhara   | 01/12/04
Not exactly true... MarcB_z   | 01/12/04
Yup Martin Marvinski   | 01/12/04
The Disadvantages of OS darkonc   | 01/12/04
Living under a rock, are we?.. GRindinAxTaRupy   | 01/12/04
SCO has unlimited funds ... MacGeek2121   | 01/13/04
I said it all along! dg mh   | 01/12/04
Too many have said that.... John Le'Brecage   | 01/12/04
yeah, too many... dg mh   | 01/12/04
Obtuse? Careful of that word... Da_Bobcee   | 01/12/04
Choose your poison... John Le'Brecage   | 01/12/04
A smidgen of truth to that at most GRindinAxTaRupy   | 01/12/04
that's an interesting spin! dg mh   | 01/12/04
No spin at all involved...just the plain truth.. GRindinAxTaRupy   | 01/12/04
Curious, why a defence fund when not needed? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 01/12/04
Not what you would call a high-risk venture? IT_User   | 01/12/04
Good point... No_Ax_to_Grind   | 01/12/04
What does industry say? MarcB_z   | 01/12/04
Wouldn't this be the same for M$ then??????? GRindinAxTaRupy   | 01/12/04
Not really, it's all perception. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 01/12/04
For the exact same reason M$ announced it would indemnify its customers! GRindinAxTaRupy   | 01/12/04
Even a frivilous lawsuit costs $$$... MarcB_z   | 01/12/04
Has it happened? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 01/12/04
Exactly! MarcB_z   | 01/12/04
Not a bad spin... John Le'Brecage   | 01/12/04
I find it curious.... NoB$   | 01/12/04
why a defence fund when not needed? Robert Hahn   | 01/12/04
because... ryusen   | 01/12/04
You're not that stupid. Martin Marvinski   | 01/12/04
What has that to do with this issue? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 01/12/04
Where's Mike? emartin_z   | 01/12/04
No_Ax, Your above flame was Misplaced ? ? ? ? (Are you slipping?) Bit's_Conscience   | 01/12/04
greed and contempt billbert5   | 01/12/04
cool! princessangry   | 01/13/04
Asinine msdead   | 01/13/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement