On CBSSports.com: Get this week's hotties in your inbox
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland
Posted on ZDNet News: Mar 4, 2004 12:28:00 AM

A judge on Wednesday ordered both the SCO Group and IBM to reveal more information in their legal tangle over Linux and Unix, including the code SCO believes infringes on its intellectual property.

In a ruling filed in the U.S. District Court in Utah, Magistrate Judge Brooke Wells said SCO hasn't yet provided enough information about its charges that IBM moved proprietary Unix software to Linux. In consequence, she ordered the company to "provide and identify all specific lines of code that IBM is alleged to have contributed to Linux from either AIX or Dynix," IBM's two versions of Unix.

The judge also directed SCO to "identify with specificity all lines of code in Linux that it claims rights to," repeating an order she issued in December. In addition, she told SCO to identify the lines of code in Unix System V that were used by IBM to create derivative works in AIX and Dynix, which were transferred to Linux.

At the same time, Wells lifted a stay on the information IBM was required to release through the discovery process that preceded the trial. She ordered IBM to produce memos from IBM Chief Executive Sam Palmisano and from Irving Wladawsky-Berger, a top Linux executive.

The move restores momentum to a case many consider central not just to the future of Linux, an increasingly popular open-source operating system, but to lawsuits SCO filed this week against AutoZone and DaimlerChrysler.

"Now the case is really going to get down to the nitty-gritty," said David Schlitz, the head of the litigation group at the intellectual property law firm Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis. "Now what you will see is that SCO has to come up with the specifics."

However, Schlitz added that the lines of code and memos aren't likely to see the light of day. "It's all going to be covered by the protective order," he said.

SCO seeks more than $5 billion in damages from IBM, which denies wrongdoing and has countersued for patent infringement and over other claims.

SCO, which in 2003 scrapped its own Linux sales effort after failing to make financial headway, wants Linux customers to pay $699 for a license that will let them use the software without fear of an intellectual property infringement lawsuit from SCO. The Lindon, Utah-based company announced its first public SCO IP licensee on Monday, EV1Servers.net.

SCO and IBM representatives declined to comment on Wells' order.

Big Blue was also ordered by Wells to produce extensive information, including 232 files from Dynix and AIX, and to identify all of its nonpublic contributions to Linux. (SCO itself is charged with identifying all public contributions.)

IBM must also supply any memos, reports and other documents relating to its Linux strategy, the judge said. In addition, IBM was ordered to pare down a list of 7,200 potential witnesses for the trial to 1,000 of the most important prospective witnesses.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 45 Talkback(s)
Nope
Its perfectly legal to support a third party in a lawsuit. Microsoft is not forbidden by law to support or expand the efforts of Unix, therefore it can support them.

However, its a cheap attem... (Read the rest)
Posted by: agramont@... Posted on: 03/16/04 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Start yer engines, mi amigos! Bobby Sskcat   | 03/03/04
Obviously, you didn't read the article... DarbyOhara   | 03/04/04
You're not paying too much attention, either CobraA1   | 03/04/04
of course... ryusen   | 03/04/04
Evidence of Microsoft's funding SCO's anti-Linux initiative. wackoae   | 03/04/04
Just one of what will be MANY M$-$CO "smoking guns".... dicktaurus@...   | 03/04/04
I'll show you mine if you will show me yours Squawkbox   | 03/03/04
As did IBM. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 03/03/04
It figures Squawkbox   | 03/03/04
It's a good thing.. Bobby Sskcat   | 03/03/04
And that matters how in this case? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 03/04/04
Missed part of the article? hortons@...   | 03/04/04
What case have you been following? IT_User   | 03/04/04
Man would I LOVE to be in that court room! No_Ax_to_Grind   | 03/03/04
IBM isn't afraid of producing source code. Zogg   | 03/03/04
Can SCO prove their claim? Squawkbox   | 03/03/04
What makes you think they have a case? Bobby Sskcat   | 03/03/04
Nice post Bobby I'm proud of ya. Squawkbox   | 03/03/04
I doubt they could CobraA1   | 03/04/04
my theory is... ryusen   | 03/04/04
Can IBM dodge the email and memo bullet nite_w0lf   | 03/03/04
The could say.... NemesisNL   | 03/04/04
Aw C'mon ZDNET why'd you pull talkback on this story? Squawkbox   | 03/03/04
LOL CobraA1   | 03/04/04
chances are... ryusen   | 03/04/04
And still no mention NemesisNL   | 03/04/04
SCO. producing code crocd   | 03/04/04
Within 45 days NemesisNL   | 03/04/04
This should clarify things............... nite_w0lf   | 03/04/04
Pure Strategy from SCO toomuchgreeatea@...   | 03/04/04
Actually Not! ShadeTree   | 03/04/04
SCO is forcing Linux users to be illegal if we don't want to use their code CobraA1   | 03/04/04
Not forcing violation, because Update victim   | 03/04/04
you're forgetting something... ryusen   | 03/04/04
I hope so CobraA1   | 03/04/04
No! Don't throw it out Update victim   | 03/04/04
Bring all fact´s in front of the court... Chris.Papoudaris@...   | 03/04/04
Code Transference - Mode and Direction - Linuxgate ??? webgecko   | 03/04/04
Microsoft funding SCO's anti-Linux initiative. wackoae   | 03/04/04
44 days to identify the code B.O.F.H.   | 03/04/04
IBM had 7,200 witnesses? Chad_z   | 03/04/04
When Will They Convict Microsoft for This Ploy? claytonmuhler   | 03/04/04
Actually one could argue that MS is funding Unix development by paying SCO balsover   | 03/12/04
Nope agramont@...   | 03/16/04
We NEED the press here - try this ZDNET UnivComputerGuy   | 03/08/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement