On The Insider: Eva Longoria's New Do
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Feb 15, 2005 3:10:00 PM

BOSTON--Top Linux seller Red Hat on Tuesday announced the latest version of its premium Linux software, leapfrogging rival Novell and expanding an effort to coax customers away from Sun Microsystems.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 4 is the first time Red Hat's commercial product includes the newer 2.6 kernel, or heart, of Linux. Although Red Hat's previous version included some 2.6 features, it was Novell's SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 that was first to include the full list last August, including improvements to communications and memory subsystems.

But Red Hat doesn't appear to have lost ground. "Novell made such a big deal that Red Hat was trailing with the 2.6 kernel. This was going to give SuSE a big entree into enterprises in the United States," said Illuminata analyst Gordon Haff. "That really doesn't seem to have happened."

Robert Frances Group analyst Stacey Quandt agreed. "The customers waited, overall," she said.

Red Hat announced the new product Tuesday at the LinuxWorld Conference and Expo here, but executives discussed the product on Monday.

Paul Cormier, Red Hat's executive vice president of engineering, said one major new feature with RHEL 4 is the inclusion of Security Enhanced Linux, or SELinux. That feature--created by the National Security Agency--allocates privileges for various computing processes in a more detailed way, making it harder for an attacker who compromises one part of a system to take over the entire machine.

SELinux is enabled by default, with strict security settings for software that provides network services, for example the Apache software for hosting Web sites, Cormier said.

The new version also includes the Firefox Web browser; Logical Volume Manager (LVM) 2 to let storage systems be spread across multiple hard drives or confined to fractions of hard drives; a connector to retrieve e-mail from Microsoft Exchange servers; support for serial ATA hard drives; and the ability to detect most digital cameras.

The Raleigh, N.C.-based company also is expanding its Red Hat Network management service so it can control servers running Sun's Solaris version of Unix. Customers wanted a management tool that could be used while they migrate from Solaris to Red Hat Linux, Cormier said.

Although Sun ships Red Hat with its x86 servers, the company is aggressively promoting Solaris as its preferred option, and it's begun making it an open-source project as well to better counter Linux.

RHEL 4 is available for 32-bit and 64-bit x86 processors such as Intel's Xeon and Advanced Micro Devices' Opteron; Intel's Itanium; and IBM's Power-based and mainframe computers. Versions are available for desktop computers, workstations, low-end servers with one or two processors, and high-end servers with four or more processors.

RHEL 4 will run software written for RHEL 3, Cormier said.

Pricing, which covers annual support subscriptions, is unchanged compared with RHEL 3. For example, a one-year subscription RHEL 4 ES for a dual-processor server costs with standard support costs $799, while a year of RHEL 4 AS for a four-processor server and premium support costs $2,499.

Red Hat also sponsors a free product, called Fedora, which lacks long-term support and hardware and software certifications. That version will be at the center of the Fedora User and Developer Conference here on Friday after LinuxWorld winds down.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 91 Talkback(s)
Right on!
I really miss COBOL Really! (Read the rest)
Posted by: Chasura Posted on: 08/15/05 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
I guess people will pay for water Roger Ramjet   | 02/15/05
Is it your purpose just to be the ... ShadeTree   | 02/15/05
RE: Is it your purpose just to be the ... richdave   | 02/15/05
Ever heard of Hardened Gentoo? The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
linux cypressbob   | 02/17/05
If you were me Roger Ramjet   | 02/16/05
Why wouldn't they? Michael Kelly   | 02/15/05
RE: Why wouldn't they? richdave   | 02/15/05
That's a pretty bold statement Michael Kelly   | 02/15/05
Small fry seosamh_z   | 02/15/05
RE: Small Fry weirving2@...   | 02/15/05
You missed it seosamh_z   | 02/15/05
You made a point! Traveler545220   | 02/15/05
Realllyyyy!!?? richdave   | 02/15/05
There already is darkmoonman   | 02/15/05
Paying for support. vdraken   | 02/15/05
90% of which market? Michael Kelly   | 02/15/05
Huh??? Tommy Gun   | 02/15/05
A couple of points Michael Kelly   | 02/15/05
Do you own MS shares or... Eerikki   | 02/15/05
"Don't hate me because I'm popular." Anton Philidor   | 02/15/05
Tinkers more like seosamh_z   | 02/15/05
What can the Penguin do for you? The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
The King's lacky seosamh_z   | 02/15/05
Fine, if you want to play it that way.... The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
More than "just another OS" Anti_Zealot   | 02/15/05
Have you lengua99   | 02/15/05
I doubt that houndgb   | 02/15/05
RE: I guess people will pay for water jkotan   | 02/15/05
leapfrogging Novell? doh123   | 02/15/05
I don't think Red Hat is worried about Novell. bjbrock   | 02/15/05
Additionally, I have to wonder why Novell bjbrock   | 02/15/05
How many ways can you say Monopoly? PCcritic   | 02/15/05
No such thing YukonRay   | 02/15/05
The reasons for Novell's losing streak bjbrock   | 02/15/05
Monopolies are natural, but not legal psuedostratified   | 02/15/05
Excellent Post (nt). doe_z   | 02/15/05
Of course they're legal; so are oligopolies. Anton Philidor   | 02/15/05
Good point, but... psuedostratified   | 02/15/05
Nice post but.... seosamh_z   | 02/15/05
Nice counter post, but... psuedostratified   | 02/15/05
You are so wrong Yehuda Mann   | 02/15/05
Well then lengua99   | 02/15/05
I can say, "MS beat Novell" houndgb   | 02/15/05
Good post. Anton Philidor   | 02/15/05
Let's be real here.... AckItsMe2   | 02/15/05
Are you kidding? johns_z   | 02/15/05
Get educated! The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
Ok, now for the real world houndgb   | 02/15/05
Windows Mounts Too.... siege@...   | 02/15/05
Do you cook ? or just alway go to the restaurant ? tom123_z   | 02/16/05
FC3 vs SUSE and MS-Windows, vs Apple Traveler545220   | 02/15/05
optional read. (This is knit-picking) The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
FC3 vs SUSE and MS-Windows, vs Apple labarker   | 02/15/05
Compatibility? seosamh_z   | 02/15/05
Apple is not --not really-- a hardware company. The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
you are wrong on SuSE 9.1 doh123   | 02/15/05
Proprietary RedHat Linux? Anton Philidor   | 02/15/05
Not a real lock-in. doe_z   | 02/15/05
Home-made operating systems. Anton Philidor   | 02/15/05
A little looking is all it takes Michael Kelly   | 02/15/05
Powerhouses. Anton Philidor   | 02/15/05
It looks like your definition of lock-in... Michael Kelly   | 02/15/05
Confusing. The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
Always seeking lock-in. Anton Philidor   | 02/15/05
Last I checked... doe_z   | 02/15/05
What? Richard Flude   | 02/15/05
RedHat and proprietary Anton Philidor   | 02/15/05
Where's the lock-in? Richard Flude   | 02/15/05
Red Hat catching SuSE catching Microsoft? sjworth@...   | 02/15/05
More gaming companies are looking to Linux The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
From what I've read IT Scion   | 02/15/05
not really doh123   | 02/15/05
Depends on a few factors. What is High-end anyway? The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
RedHat fighting back... doe_z   | 02/15/05
Linux Vs Microsoft RichmondGiant   | 02/15/05
Maybe you don't realise why Mac's cost US$3,000.00 The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
Linux no Threat Olde Foxx   | 02/15/05
I disagree Linux belongs on the Desktop Krazyken39   | 02/15/05
Well, it's all about ... jrniccolls@...   | 02/15/05
You use the term, 'Flaw,' loosely. The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
Catching up to Microsoft Axeman3813   | 02/15/05
You can play your games! The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
I thought I was wrong but I was Mistaken {DirectX support} The King's Servant   | 02/15/05
Right on! darkmoonman   | 02/15/05
Surely not! Richard Flude   | 02/15/05
Linux is growing in popularity Pieintheface   | 02/15/05
Linux should go up Joshivs   | 02/15/05
A few comments. doe_z   | 02/17/05
Linux should go up Chasura   | 08/15/05
Right on! Chasura   | 08/15/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement