On CHOW: Does drinking ice water burn calories?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried
Posted on ZDNet News: Apr 25, 2005 1:00:00 PM

After revving the engine for quite a while, Microsoft is hoping to take 64-bit computing into the fast lane.

The software maker, which has been tooling around with the 64-bit version of Windows for the better part of two years, is announcing the general availability of the long-awaited product later on Monday. The company will start selling 64-bit editions of both Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP Professional.

The new Windows won't be showing up on retail shelves, though. Customers who buy a desktop or server with a 64-bit chip will have the option of getting the new operating system, while people who own an existing 64-bit machine will have the option of trading in their old 32-bit Windows for the 64-bit upgrade.

Microsoft's announcement is welcome news, particularly for chipmaker AMD, which has had 64-bit server chips on the market for two years and 64-bit desktop processors for 18 months. The software maker issued a test version of 64-bit Windows in the fall of 2003, when AMD released its first Athlon 64 processors. A final version was planned for early last year, but encountered a number of delays.

"With today's release of Microsoft's Windows Server 2003 x64 Editions and Windows XP Professional x64 Edition, customers can now fully realize the power of the AMD Opteron processor," AMD CEO Hector Ruiz said in a statement. Of course, while AMD has been waiting, rival Intel has come out with similar chips of its own.

The so-called x64 versions of Windows support chips from Intel and AMD that have added 64-bit instructions to the existing Pentium and Athlon architectures. Microsoft already has a version of Windows for Intel's high-end 64-bit Itanium chip, which uses a completely distinct instructions set.

Drivers wanted
Now that Microsoft has finally finished its 64-bit work, the company is doing all it can to get others to follow suit. Having the hardware and software isn't the only thing that is needed. In order to effectively work in 64-bit environments, computer users also need updated drivers for their hardware add-ons, which are things like scanners and printers.

That is the one area where Microsoft still needs help--a message Microsoft executives have stressed for some time and are likely to reiterate at this week's Windows Hardware Engineering Conference in Seattle. So far, about 16,000 drivers have been rewritten to support the new operating system.

Already, PC makers are hopping on the bandwagon, particularly on the server side. Hewlett-Packard, for example, plans to announce support for the 64-bit version of Windows Server across its ProLiant line of servers.

"It's not quite there on the client," said Greg Sullivan, a lead product manager in Microsoft's Windows unit. Sullivan said that for now, the desktop 64-bit Windows version is likely to appeal mainly to the hardest of the hard-core enthusiasts--people doing video rendering, or game development, for example.

Dell said it will install the 64-bit operating system on its Precision workstation line and on its PowerEdge servers. Orders for the Dell Precision 470 and 670 workstations can be placed starting Monday, while the server OS will be available on Dell systems starting in June, the computer manufacturer said.

While right now it is the game developers that are likely to run 64-bit Windows, the gamers themselves won't be far behind.

"In the Longhorn time frame, we think it (64-bit computing) will be mainstream." Sullivan said. Microsoft has said that Longhorn--the next version of Windows--will come in both 32-bit and 64-bit flavors.

Long and winding road
Although the road to 64-bit Windows has taken longer than Microsoft once hoped, Windows Chief Jim Allchin said in a recent interview that the shift is now inevitable. Intel and AMD aren't charging significantly more for chips with the added abilities, nor is Microsoft charging more for its operating system.

"I see it as preordained," Allchin said. By the end of the year, Allchin said it will be quite difficult to find a server with a 32-bit processor. Desktop PCs will move slower, but 64-bit PCs should make up a significant chunk of shipments by next year.

When computing does make the leap, Allchin said the benefits will be significant, even if many of them are not yet apparent.

The clearest impact of 64-bit computing is the ability to deal with more than 4GB of physical memory. However, only the most sophisticated applications and databases are bumping up against this limit today. Down the road, though, Allchin said whole new ways of computing will open up. Imagine, how fast searching might be if all of one's e-mail, for example, were loaded into memory.

But Allchin said there are performance gains that many types of programs can today get if companies are willing to slightly rewrite their applications. He pointed to Cakewalk, a music program that got a 40 percent gain by moving to a 64-bit system.

There are also ways that Microsoft can use the added bits to enhance security, he said. Specifically, Allchin said Microsoft will make better use of the no-execute chip feature, which helps prevent overflow errors.

"It doesn't make things perfect," Allchin said. But, he added, "it is another way of preventing mischief from taking place."

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 157 Talkback(s)
Cause: Drivers
The only real problem I can see in the 64-bit edition is the lack of drivers. I know I would have installed the new version, IF I could find a driver for my SpeedTouch DSL modem. That's the real problem for Microsoft here. They need support from other OEMs.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: hosamaly6@... Posted on: 04/28/05 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
I plugged my WinXP 64 box to the net and all I got was this lousy T-shirt Jeff Spicoli   | 04/25/05
Lucky.. I got a client with constant BSODs/reboots Xunil_Sierutuf   | 04/25/05
SUUUURRE!!! vdraken   | 04/25/05
You sound like a Microsoft tech.. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 04/25/05
yep azucaro   | 04/25/05
You sound like a Linux sociopath. Altern_z   | 04/25/05
Yup Jeff Spicoli   | 04/25/05
ROTFLMAO.. yes, we're all lying... Xunil_Sierutuf   | 04/26/05
Probably did, at work FilledOut   | 04/25/05
Yes, MS flaws partially pays the bills.. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 04/25/05
you can LinuxHippie   | 04/25/05
Thanks..! Luckily, others had the same problem.. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 04/25/05
What's on the T-shirt??? cpuguy1   | 04/25/05
I'll tell ya.. Jeff Spicoli   | 04/25/05
I just want Roger Ramjet   | 04/25/05
As I said long long ago. nucrash   | 04/25/05
Collusion? rapson   | 04/25/05
sanity check LinuxHippie   | 04/25/05
re: sanity check Wolfie2K3   | 04/25/05
Collusion? dimonic   | 04/25/05
And... rapson   | 04/25/05
When you dominate xx% of the market.... nucrash   | 04/25/05
I believe there is no collusion osreinstall   | 04/25/05
None at all jheine   | 04/25/05
None at all jheine osreinstall   | 04/26/05
All you need is a little common sense Carl Jeff Spicoli   | 04/25/05
No I can't rapson   | 04/25/05
Oh come on Carl! Jeff Spicoli   | 04/25/05
re: And... Wolfie2K3   | 04/25/05
Collusion Altern_z   | 04/25/05
Subsidize AMD? ejsecco   | 04/25/05
Just don't like AMD getting the short end of the stick. nucrash   | 04/25/05
China.. Wolfie2K3   | 04/25/05
A transition which is the second in our lifetime lugcalicut   | 04/25/05
Simple reason Rick_K   | 04/25/05
takes a while to redo the applications, too. Anton Philidor   | 04/25/05
Try THIRD... Wolfie2K3   | 04/25/05
Naw.... try Northwolf   | 04/26/05
Why don't i believe? Macmax77   | 04/25/05
Only ten years late: but Linux had it in 1995 maddoghall   | 04/25/05
Maybe, but no one cared. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 04/25/05
Correction... Michael Kelly   | 04/25/05
Movie Goers Cared....Weathermen cared maddoghall   | 04/25/05
Salute to the Maddog nucrash   | 04/25/05
good point, never thought of that, but it makes sense Jeff Spicoli   | 04/25/05
Very rarely do I make a good point, but nucrash   | 04/25/05
Sweet Jeff Spicoli   | 04/25/05
iMac (Original) nucrash   | 04/25/05
Movie Goers Cared....Weathermen cared...Mistaken Beliefs. walterreads@...   | 04/26/05
*Cough WinNT on Alpha cough* Loverock Davidson   | 04/25/05
don't forget MIPS (NT) LinuxHippie   | 04/25/05
Yes... rpedroche   | 04/25/05
bzzzzzt! Wrong, but thanks for playing Sxooter_z   | 04/25/05
Was it 64 bit? Michael Kelly   | 04/25/05
(points to Sxooter's post and adds) rpedroche   | 04/25/05
YOu got 1 of the chips wrong! B.O.F.H.   | 04/25/05
older NT ran on Alpha, but very poorly thabaer   | 04/25/05
Sorry rpedroche   | 04/25/05
Windows 4.0 kelkins@...   | 04/26/05
Guess again... Wolfie2K3   | 04/25/05
Hmmm....somthing wrong here.... dsentman@...   | 04/27/05
Oh goodie... now what? Prognosticator   | 04/25/05
Now... get ready for this... worms/trojans that start with W64. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 04/25/05
Good upgrade. pinpintalk@...   | 04/25/05
Wait for the service packs! dbrimlow   | 04/25/05
buggier is right! just like when win2k came out. wessonjoe   | 04/25/05
While I do agree... brokenuser   | 04/25/05
why 64 bit BarbieLee   | 04/25/05
Clock speed? AnyOldUser   | 04/25/05
Streaming data is CKD all over again OldFossil   | 04/25/05
Sounds interesting... rpedroche   | 04/25/05
Define "streaming" CobraA1   | 04/25/05
64^2 more ways zclayton2   | 04/25/05
Who cares if Linux is 256-bit jogiba@...   | 04/25/05
Linux runs its own apps,quite fast and efficiently muhammadkm   | 04/25/05
So? rpedroche   | 04/25/05
That shows all of us how much you know about Linux... jgmsys@...   | 04/25/05
Shows what you know about WINE nucrash   | 04/25/05
Why wait for the law, let's string 'em up NOW! ralph124c41   | 04/25/05
Thank you jmarkow1   | 04/25/05
Thank you, Mr. Obvious. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 04/25/05
Well... rapson   | 04/25/05
No, the rants wouldn't change FilledOut   | 04/25/05
I will praise Microsoft for one thing Jeff Spicoli   | 04/25/05
True rapson   | 04/25/05
What.... you fail to mention me? nucrash   | 04/25/05
I agree completely Jeff Spicoli   | 04/25/05
I would give examples.... nucrash   | 04/25/05
That pendulum swings both ways... Sabz5150   | 04/25/05
Unix - 64-bit Risc processors pinpintalk@...   | 04/25/05
And there *was* a Windows for RISC processors rpedroche   | 04/25/05
That would had been a huge result.... michael-t   | 04/25/05
MIPS but not SPARC voska   | 04/25/05
My apologies rpedroche   | 04/25/05
Do anybody know how Win 64 would support Win 32 muhammadkm   | 04/25/05
From MS quietLee   | 04/25/05
Good answer.. I was going to say rubber bands and duct tape.. Xunil_Sierutuf   | 04/25/05
Won't it be performance sappy muhammadkm   | 04/25/05
Why? quietLee   | 04/25/05
At last: (last again) ms-windows-64 michael-t   | 04/25/05
Minor mention of Mac sdwood   | 04/25/05
It is really telling michael-t   | 04/25/05
Just like when they brag about windows 95 back then. bonifacio.r.jayo@...   | 04/25/05
Curious.... ejcrist   | 04/25/05
It is interesting to see michael-t   | 04/25/05
Actually Sxooter_z   | 04/25/05
The stupidity starts at the top nojoeloser   | 04/25/05
RE: Curious....Since the latest estimates are that MS Windows is currently nightshade0143   | 04/25/05
Keeping Windows going don.chambers@...   | 04/25/05
More than 2 programs osreinstall   | 04/25/05
And now the BIG question... Arkyn1   | 04/25/05
State of readiness Michael Kelly   | 04/25/05
And 5 more years ago... Arkyn1   | 04/25/05
Other than gamers In_the_end_I_Win   | 04/25/05
RE: Other than gamers nightshade0143   | 04/25/05
That I will disagree with Michael Kelly   | 04/26/05
Multimedia users will benefit Michael Kelly   | 04/25/05
Then don't buy it, and don't complain quietLee   | 04/25/05
Speaking of evolution... quietLee   | 04/25/05
Dude... Sabz5150   | 04/25/05
You're Right Arkyn1   | 04/25/05
Never? jheine   | 04/25/05
heh CobraA1   | 04/25/05
Windows is at a disadvantage when converting to 64 bit Michael Kelly   | 04/25/05
WRONG kelkins@...   | 04/26/05
Pandoras Box of 64bit Froggy_z   | 04/25/05
Yowza, a "4200 pc network" nojoeloser   | 04/25/05
Do you know how to setup a network??? kelkins@...   | 04/26/05
Why debug when 64bit computing is old stuff. ggstart   | 04/25/05
I've actually used it ron_cleaver@...   | 04/25/05
Which version? Michael Kelly   | 04/25/05
All of them ron_cleaver@...   | 04/26/05
Now my AMD creations are fully unleashed zeusfuse   | 04/25/05
Almost there.... jheine   | 04/25/05
You can always tell when Apple is ready to launch a new OS casbo   | 04/25/05
RE: You can always tell when Apple is ready to launch a new OS nightshade0143   | 04/25/05
I will buy to try only. For now.. Mission critical still on Linux beli0135   | 04/25/05
Mission Critical on Linux??? John Zern   | 04/25/05
oh really? Sxooter_z   | 04/25/05
RE: Mission Critical on Linux??? nightshade0143   | 04/25/05
Surprized ? michael-t   | 04/25/05
64-bit Windows is worthless Guy Fawkes   | 04/25/05
Yeah yeah yeah quietLee   | 04/25/05
Memory lgordonj   | 04/25/05
Moore's law is just around the bend CobraA1   | 04/25/05
I agree ron_cleaver@...   | 04/26/05
Cause: Drivers hosamaly6@...   | 04/28/05
64-bit Windows puppadave   | 04/25/05
Windows crashes quietLee   | 04/25/05
There is much to what the box doesn't perform to FilledOut   | 04/25/05
windows-64 it's as good as michael-t   | 04/25/05
The Greatest Question... walterreads@...   | 04/26/05
Is 128 bit Windows only 18 months away? bruce_h27   | 04/26/05
Bruce... mabricen   | 04/26/05
For 64-bit DBMS like SQL2005 it is great news. pelsql   | 04/26/05
Any version of Windows is really ..... Reverend MacFellow   | 04/27/05
Whatever... blackbelt_jones   | 04/27/05

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
  • Printers
  • 'Green' Font Cuts Costs and Saves Trees (BNET)
  • Three Ways to Save Paper (BNET)
  • CNET Reviews printer buying guide (CNET)
  • View all printers-tagged content on ZDNet
  • Plan B from Brother
  • It's the smarter way to work in color Our professional color ink-jet all-in-ones give you more choices, more features, and more value. Make the Smarter Choice. Learn More »
advertisement