On CBS.com: Spock's dying words
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Joris Evers, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Mar 23, 2006 12:00:00 PM

If there's one company that stands to benefit from the delay of Microsoft's Windows Vista operating system, it's Apple Computer, analysts said.

While Microsoft has been struggling to release its new operating system, Apple has regularly put out updates for its Mac OS. Moreover, Apple is already strong in areas where Microsoft has promised to deliver key improvements with Vista: security, and features such as video and photo editing and search, analysts said.

"Apple is the one clear beneficiary of the flip in Vista," said Gene Munster, an analyst with Piper Jaffray. If shoppers are looking for what Vista has been promising, the decision is easy, he said. Before, "they would have...had to look at a PC against a Mac. Now they only have one choice, at least for this holiday season, and that's the Mac."

Microsoft announced on Tuesday that Vista, the successor to the 4-year-old Windows XP operating system, won't be widely available to consumers until January. That has PC makers and retailers missing the important December shopping season to sell computers with the long-anticipated new Windows software.

Microsoft's loss is Apple's gain is the consensus among analysts. "Apple...should enjoy a less competitive market for another holiday season against an aging Windows offering," Richard Farmer, an analyst with Merrill Lynch, wrote in a research note Wednesday.

The Cupertino, Calif., company has an opportunity to further boost sales of Macs, which have already grown significantly in past years, said Shaw Wu, an analyst with American Technology Research in San Francisco. As an additional benefit, Apple now has more time to work on its next operating system release, Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, he said.

The Vista delay is most likely to be felt by those trying to sell into the consumer market, a space Apple knows very well, Jupiter Research analyst Michael Gartenberg said. "It is a real opportunity for Apple to tout the features of their operating system and, of course, the fact that that operating system is available now."

Longhorn

Apple shipped 4.5 million Macs in its 2005 fiscal year, which ended last September. That was up 38 percent from 3.3 million units in the earlier year, according to American Technology Research. For the current year, the research outfit predicts that Apple will ship 4.8 million Macs, a 5 percent year-on-year increase, Wu said.

Microsoft's delay will help generate Mac sales, but it's tough to say how many, the analysts said. "There are two critical PC-buying windows for computers: back-to-school and the holiday season," Piper Jaffray's Munster said. "Microsoft is going to be on the sidelines for both of those this year. That has to benefit Apple."

However, Apple also faces some challenges, particularly with its transition to Intel processors, Wu said. "The Microsoft delay helps, but I think Apple is limited a bit by the fact that it still has not moved its entire product line to Intel," he said.

Microsoft is being hampered by its own success. Apple has been able to churn out operating system update after update, while Microsoft has now taken more than five years to ship a new OS.

"The biggest reason is that Microsoft has a much harder job to do," Munster said. "They need to be compatible with an army of devices and different types of software and different hardware platforms. Apple only has to be true to itself, and because of that the development process is multiple times more efficient for Apple."

Apple has jabbed at Microsoft's slower pace, most notably at its June 2004 developer conference, where it posted huge banners with taunts such as "Redmond, we have a problem" and "This should keep Redmond busy." (Microsoft, of course, is based in Redmond, Wash.)

The two are likely to draw even more head-to-head comparisons now that both operating systems are running on the same underlying processors and other internal components.

Apple's quicker pace has allowed it to get new features into its operating system faster. For example, both Microsoft and Apple talked about the need for improved desktop search at roughly the same time. Apple shipped the feature as part of a Mac OS X 10.4 update last April, while Microsoft's similar feature won't show up until Vista, though the company has made a downloadable desktop search add-on available amid competition from Google and others.

Many of the new music-handling and photo management tools in Vista are also strikingly similar to features that Apple has either in its OS or in companion products such as iPhoto and iTunes.

Apple had its own quagmire back in the 1990s as it tried to ready its next-generation operating system. In many ways, the original Mac OS X was an operating system that was seven years in the making.

But by moving to a newer and more modern base, Apple has been able to crank out successors in very short order. Apple released the original version of Mac OS X five years ago this Friday, and in September it served up the 10.1 update that fixed some of the bugs and features that were missing from the initial release.

Three more releases, all paid updates, have followed. Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar was released in August 2002, Mac OS X 10.3 Panther came in October 2003 and Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger went on sale in April 2005.

Apple has since slowed the pace somewhat. Apple Chief Software Technology Officer Avie Tevanian said in 2004 that Apple would take a little bit longer with Tiger and its successors than it had with the first few releases of OS X.

Still, the company is slated to release Leopard, the next release of OS X, either late this year or early next year. That means it too could conceivably be on new machines before Vista.

Apple declined to comment for this story.

If there's one company that stands to benefit from the delay of Microsoft's Windows Vista operating system, it's Apple Computer, analysts said.

While Microsoft has been struggling to release its new operating system, Apple has regularly put out updates for its Mac OS. Moreover, Apple is already strong in areas where Microsoft has promised to deliver key improvements with Vista: security, and features such as video and photo editing and search, analysts said.

"Apple is the one clear beneficiary of the flip in Vista," said Gene Munster, an analyst with Piper Jaffray. If shoppers are looking for what Vista has been promising, the decision is easy, he said. Before, "they would have...had to look at a PC against a Mac. Now they only have one choice, at least for this holiday season, and that's the Mac."

Microsoft announced on Tuesday that Vista, the successor to the 4-year-old Windows XP operating system, won't be widely available to consumers until January. That has PC makers and retailers missing the important December shopping season to sell computers with the long-anticipated new Windows software.

Microsoft's loss is Apple's gain is the consensus among analysts. "Apple...should enjoy a less competitive market for another holiday season against an aging Windows offering," Richard Farmer, an analyst with Merrill Lynch, wrote in a research note Wednesday.

The Cupertino, Calif., company has an opportunity to further boost sales of Macs, which have already grown significantly in past years, said Shaw Wu, an analyst with American Technology Research in San Francisco. As an additional benefit, Apple now has more time to work on its next operating system release, Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, he said.

The Vista delay is most likely to be felt by those trying to sell into the consumer market, a space Apple knows very well, Jupiter Research analyst Michael Gartenberg said. "It is a real opportunity for Apple to tout the features of their operating system and, of course, the fact that that operating system is available now."

Longhorn

Apple shipped 4.5 million Macs in its 2005 fiscal year, which ended last September. That was up 38 percent from 3.3 million units in the earlier year, according to American Technology Research. For the current year, the research outfit predicts that Apple will ship 4.8 million Macs, a 5 percent year-on-year increase, Wu said.

Microsoft's delay will help generate Mac sales, but it's tough to say how many, the analysts said. "There are two critical PC-buying windows for computers: back-to-school and the holiday season," Piper Jaffray's Munster said. "Microsoft is going to be on the sidelines for both of those this year. That has to benefit Apple."

However, Apple also faces some challenges, particularly with its transition to Intel processors, Wu said. "The Microsoft delay helps, but I think Apple is limited a bit by the fact that it still has not moved its entire product line to Intel," he said.

Microsoft is being hampered by its own success. Apple has been able to churn out operating system update after update, while Microsoft has now taken more than five years to ship a new OS.

"The biggest reason is that Microsoft has a much harder job to do," Munster said. "They need to be compatible with an army of devices and different types of software and different hardware platforms. Apple only has to be true to itself, and because of that the development process is multiple times more efficient for Apple."

Apple has jabbed at Microsoft's slower pace, most notably at its June 2004 developer conference, where it posted huge banners with taunts such as "Redmond, we have a problem" and "This should keep Redmond busy." (Microsoft, of course, is based in Redmond, Wash.)

The two are likely to draw even more head-to-head comparisons now that both operating systems are running on the same underlying processors and other internal components.

Apple's quicker pace has allowed it to get new features into its operating system faster. For example, both Microsoft and Apple talked about the need for improved desktop search at roughly the same time. Apple shipped the feature as part of a Mac OS X 10.4 update last April, while Microsoft's similar feature won't show up until Vista, though the company has made a downloadable desktop search add-on available amid competition from Google and others.

Many of the new music-handling and photo management tools in Vista are also strikingly similar to features that Apple has either in its OS or in companion products such as iPhoto and iTunes.

Apple had its own quagmire back in the 1990s as it tried to ready its next-generation operating system. In many ways, the original Mac OS X was an operating system that was seven years in the making.

But by moving to a newer and more modern base, Apple has been able to crank out successors in very short order. Apple released the original version of Mac OS X five years ago this Friday, and in September it served up the 10.1 update that fixed some of the bugs and features that were missing from the initial release.

Three more releases, all paid updates, have followed. Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar was released in August 2002, Mac OS X 10.3 Panther came in October 2003 and Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger went on sale in April 2005.

Apple has since slowed the pace somewhat. Apple Chief Software Technology Officer Avie Tevanian said in 2004 that Apple would take a little bit longer with Tiger and its successors than it had with the first few releases of OS X.

Still, the company is slated to release Leopard, the next release of OS X, either late this year or early next year. That means it too could conceivably be on new machines before Vista.

Apple declined to comment for this story.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 142 Talkback(s)
... for some reason only work in IE.
Also known as forced monopoly.

The average user has EVERYTHING out of a MAC box! Only those who are power users need the expensive programs - just like in Windows!

ActiveX - a good thing; but also an entry point for sabotage!... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Va1rum1 Posted on: 03/26/06 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Not "when" but "why" Techscan   | 03/23/06
Hairball Len Rooney   | 03/23/06
"Why?" is right woodymiller   | 03/24/06
The Windows OS is already proficient at what I need it to do ajole   | 03/24/06
Not going to happen. Outside T. Box   | 03/23/06
M$ is too busy trying to make every product DarthRidiculous   | 03/23/06
and... JonnyZ   | 03/23/06
RE: and... Protagonistic   | 03/24/06
We don't go wrong, we just add different things ajole   | 03/24/06
your time is money dwjunix   | 03/24/06
Dude, can't you keep your PCs running? ajole   | 03/24/06
RE: and... richdave   | 03/25/06
M$ is too busy ... too incompetent! Va1rum1   | 03/26/06
Best of both worlds tic swayback   | 03/23/06
Intel macs?, the best of what? lostinlodos   | 03/25/06
Intel macs? and why again? Va1rum1   | 03/26/06
Mac wishful thinking again Confused by religion   | 03/23/06
Easy answer tic swayback   | 03/23/06
Sorry - dual booting is a non-starter. Confused by religion   | 03/23/06
Dual booting is a bad solution tic swayback   | 03/23/06
Oh, yeah, and pay for VMware license on top. Confused by religion   | 03/23/06
Re: Oh, yeah, and pay for VMware license on top. yyuko@...   | 03/23/06
Actually... tic swayback   | 03/23/06
Better Maybe codeguy007   | 03/24/06
Key word: "most" tic swayback   | 03/24/06
You forget iLife Ken_z   | 03/23/06
Time ago... hal9000mx   | 03/23/06
Em, forgive me for this, hal9000mx dropzone@...   | 03/24/06
OS X has want most users want out of the box. jbkendrick   | 03/24/06
It does? codeguy007   | 03/24/06
YES, it does! gnugen   | 03/24/06
Burning CD's through Windows Kid Icarus   | 03/24/06
... for some reason only work in IE. Va1rum1   | 03/26/06
True, no one needs parallel systems... woot!   | 03/24/06
True, switching OSes is easy codeguy007   | 03/24/06
sorry but... JonnyZ   | 03/23/06
Basically, Yes! hal9000mx   | 03/23/06
Really? How many running Yugo can you find? GoPower   | 03/23/06
RE: Really? How many running Yugo can you find? handydan918   | 03/24/06
Why? tic swayback   | 03/23/06
BS codeguy007   | 03/24/06
pay twice the price? MTMacPhee   | 03/24/06
Unequal hardware? tic swayback   | 03/24/06
Think again, codeguy007 dropzone@...   | 03/24/06
You just added $129 to the Mac . ajole   | 03/24/06
Still... tic swayback   | 03/25/06
True, but I'm betting few buy all of it again. ajole   | 03/25/06
Truth Happens mighetto   | 03/23/06
Microsoft doesn't have to influence customers ajole   | 03/24/06
It just fools them! Va1rum1   | 03/26/06
Yes and no j.m.galvin   | 03/23/06
RE: Mac wishful thinking again Linux User 147560   | 03/23/06
It's cheaper to get a Mac or Linux machine by far! IronCladChicken   | 03/24/06
Do you really Believe that crap? ajole   | 03/24/06
Milly, sometimes you gotta pay more for the fastest computer tic swayback   | 03/23/06
Good point, but limited audience. ajole   | 03/24/06
Yeah, but... tic swayback   | 03/25/06
Upgrading is dangerous, why not new PC? or Mac? tadd_z   | 03/23/06
Thats because they don't know how to install the translators ajole   | 03/24/06
Rose coloured glasses Richard Flude   | 03/23/06
You want "MS COMEDY"?? dropzone@...   | 03/24/06
There ya go! I'm laughing with you! ajole   | 03/24/06
Right, not! GoPower   | 03/23/06
Yes, you can get no-OS boxes form dealers ajole   | 03/24/06
Wake Up! Its 2006 woodymiller   | 03/24/06
RE: Mac wishful thinking again Protagonistic   | 03/24/06
Thank you! ajole   | 03/24/06
But... what's not to miss, average consumer?? dropzone@...   | 03/24/06
Great, but do most people actually use any of that? ajole   | 03/24/06
Not Word, wordPAD! ajole   | 03/24/06
That doesn't make sense... Stellardyne   | 03/23/06
Taking it Harry Bardal   | 03/23/06
Vista delay could add up to Mac sales Loverock Davidson   | 03/23/06
Delay won't have that big of an impact yyuko@...   | 03/23/06
HE MENTIONS ME!!! LOOK!! Loverock Davidson   | 03/23/06
"No Measurable Impact..." vulpine@...   | 03/24/06
So many things wrong with that study, and your numbers ajole   | 03/24/06
Think in terms of the numbers though tic swayback   | 03/23/06
Then let's wait to have this discussion in a year or so Confused by religion   | 03/23/06
Should be fun to see tic swayback   | 03/23/06
Everyone only wins if MS actually improves ajole   | 03/24/06
Stop the Dual-Booting madness! yyuko@...   | 03/23/06
Because it works *right now* and ppl need it for games .. Wayne T   | 03/24/06
KVM is the Dual boot of my world ajole   | 03/24/06
XP on Mac not gamer friendly The_Q   | 03/25/06
Old dogs--new tricks Userama   | 03/23/06
Sorry Macheads... JonnyZ   | 03/23/06
And your two cents is, well, worth two cents! GoPower   | 03/23/06
Agree Mark Miller   | 03/23/06
I have a whole lotta clients that would beg to differ... Linux User 147560   | 03/23/06
Win2K more secure? Mark Miller   | 03/23/06
Re: I have a whole lotta clients that would beg to differ JonnyZ   | 03/24/06
Many complaints about WinME Mark Miller   | 03/25/06
I agree with you, ME was never as bad for me ajole   | 03/25/06
1% of all hardware sold in a year is MILLIONS! ajole   | 03/24/06
the PC-butt is right ... dlmeyer@...   | 03/24/06
Its the hardware sales that suffer. The_Q   | 03/25/06
But wait a second! Mac doesn't compete with Windows. PB_z   | 03/23/06
Judge Jackson: Mac doesn't compete with Windows. Wayne T   | 03/24/06
That's a real stretch of the imagination... Feldwebel Wolfenstool   | 03/23/06
Some of us aren't waiting till christmas The_Q   | 03/24/06
Nice move/nice Mac summation: why drop Firefox ? Wayne T   | 03/24/06
Customers still want Windows djones7351   | 03/24/06
Yes - But they run it on Macs now... Wayne T   | 03/24/06
I doubt Windows users await new operating system releases richwig   | 03/24/06
No, but... NobodyHome   | 03/24/06
You are dead on. Mel_Snyder   | 03/24/06
Checy owners may not buy a BMW ... mwagner@...  ZDNet | 03/24/06
This is ridiculous...XP works just fine! Mel_Snyder   | 03/24/06
Get over it. trm1945   | 03/24/06
How about MAC on a PC? morgade1   | 03/24/06
Hmm I wonder why codeguy007   | 03/24/06
PearPC The_Q   | 03/25/06
Wow, the PC Zealots oare vocal today! ewelch   | 03/24/06
Vista's biggest Problem won't be this Delay codeguy007   | 03/24/06
That's shallow. Narg   | 03/24/06
I've been running Vista since Aug. 2002! An_Axe_to_Grind   | 03/24/06
Sure it is.... Kid Icarus   | 03/24/06
What are these analysts smoking lately? kernelparker2002   | 03/24/06
Who knows codeguy007   | 03/24/06
definitely, probably, maybe. shraven   | 03/24/06
Wishful Thinking Lives! cramthat   | 03/24/06
Mac Sales?? puppadave   | 03/24/06
Cut me a break Anthony Volpe   | 03/24/06
Apple over Windows!?---that's CRAZY!!!!!!! brojnmrule   | 03/24/06
As Mencia would say: dee dee dee... usc1801   | 03/24/06
why puppadave   | 03/24/06
Apple's strength is also Apple's weakness mwagner@...  ZDNet | 03/24/06
*rolls eyes* paferg   | 03/24/06
How about some facts? sdwood   | 03/24/06
Kudos, ZD. You've find your George Oui for Mac! friedcow   | 03/24/06
haahahahahahhahahahahahaha An_Axe_to_Grind   | 03/25/06
How about niether? AZflyman   | 03/24/06
Is it only my perception ... jason.mailley   | 03/24/06
Non-news - just another Opinion to stir folks up kbeartxzd   | 03/24/06
Holiday in Europe ??? g.otten   | 03/25/06
Hmm not in the Land of the Rings The_Q   | 03/25/06
Apple or Linux who needs micro$oft? jackofalltradesmasterofnone   | 03/25/06
Amen brother! An_Axe_to_Grind   | 03/25/06
Apple should port OSX to regular Wintel machines wvoutlaw2002   | 03/25/06
Dang the ABMers are hot here Boot_Agnostic   | 03/25/06
The real world, who uses what, real %s fom around the world lostinlodos   | 03/25/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
advertisement
Click Here