On CBS.com: HD may burn your eyes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ingrid Marson
Posted on ZDNet News: May 24, 2006 7:46:00 PM

Software patent campaigners have reacted with surprise to an apparent change in the European Commission's stance on those patents.

The Commission said last week that computer programs will be excluded from patentability in the upcoming Community Patent legislation and that the European Patent Office will be bound by this law.

"The EPO would...apply and be bound by a new unitary Community law with respect to Community patents," the Commission said in a statement. "The draft Community Patent regulation confirms in its Article 28.1(a) that patents granted for a subject matter (such as computer programs), which is excluded from patentability pursuant to Article 52 EPC, may be invalidated in a relevant court proceeding."

This statement appears to contradict one made by the EC last year, when it said that the EPO would continue to grant software patents that make a technical contribution, despite the European Parliament's decision to reject the software patent directive. That directive would have widened the extent to which software could be patented.

The Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure, which has doggedly campaigned against software patents in Europe, was confused at the change of tune.

"I'm stunned," Pieter Hintjens, the president of the FFII, said Wednesday. "Does the Commission now accept that the EPC (European Patent Convention) rules do actually rule? Or have I misunderstood something?"

In the past, campaigners have expressed concerns that the Community Patent legislation would be used by the Commission to legalize software patents.

The EC statement last week was made in response to a question posed by a Polish member of the European Parliament, Adam Gierek, in April. Gierek asked whether the Community Patent legislation would ratify the EPO's current practice of granting software patents.

"I am concerned about European Patent Office practices, which are undermining the social acceptability of the patent system, with patents being granted for solutions that are not patentable under the current law," Gierek said in his question. "Does the Commission still stand by the position set out in...the proposal for a Council regulation on the Community patent, namely that the case law which the EPO developed for the European patent will apply to the Community patent?"

Even if the Community Patent legislation does allow software patents to be invalidated in court, that would not be enough, Hintjens said. The patent office should offer an independent appeal process, rather than forcing companies to pursue a costly legal case at the European Court of Justice, he said.

"The proposed Community Patents will be granted by the EPO--a nonaccountable, non-Community organization--with no independent appeal possible. The Commission says this is not a problem, since the (European Court of Justice) can invalidate the granted patents in infringement cases," Hintjens said.

"That is, however, only true if it comes to civil litigation, which is often too expensive for (smaller companies), forcing them to pay for a license. Therefore, software patents not yet taken to court will impose an enormous burden on the industry," he added.

Gierek's question and the EC's full answer can be viewed on the European Parliament's Web site.

Ingrid Marson of ZDNet UK reported from London.

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 66 Talkback(s)
Yes. Quite.
I am in agreement with Nigel's opinion. It may eventually happen in the USA, but the lawyers have it for now. In the eyes of this ignorant Yankee infidel what has been allowed to happen with softwar... (Read the rest)
Posted by: znewt Posted on: 06/06/06 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Europe sucks to the core hopefulcoder   | 05/24/06
Simple reason for that voska   | 05/24/06
It's simple mobrien_12@...   | 05/24/06
Yeah Dumber_z   | 05/29/06
Total confusion here Loggies   | 05/30/06
hehe great news toxicfreak   | 05/24/06
i agree, very cool tridell   | 05/24/06
The EU can't find their butts with both hands. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 05/24/06
Easy to be confused. Anton Philidor   | 05/24/06
What a strange response nizuse   | 05/24/06
Axey's and Anton's biggest problem: OButterball   | 05/25/06
Just flame bait GrumpyOldMan   | 05/25/06
Sort of ... OButterball   | 05/25/06
If you're having difficulty, please ask. Anton Philidor   | 05/25/06
Uh huh, and "pay for good work," ... OButterball   | 05/25/06
Don't feel bad Mad Ivan. osreinstall   | 05/25/06
From another confused sexagenarian IT_User   | 05/25/06
Curmudgeons... Anton Philidor   | 05/26/06
That's Axey for you Shelendrea   | 05/25/06
USA next Nigel Johnstone   | 05/24/06
I agree with every thing you said, but.... DCMann   | 05/31/06
Yes. Quite. znewt   | 06/06/06
it must be made clear Linux Geek   | 05/24/06
EU is some kind of Police state SouthernPride   | 05/24/06
Message has been deleted. Linux Geek   | 05/24/06
Linux user and support here SouthernPride   | 05/24/06
Geek, don't go away mad, just go away. No_Ax_to_Grind   | 05/24/06
Geek is in the basement go to the light SouthernPride   | 05/24/06
Well, and where are you living? Arnout Groen   | 05/25/06
Just ignore him Shelendrea   | 05/25/06
NSA Dumber_z   | 05/29/06
This story is showing the opposite quantumstate   | 05/29/06
EU companies will patent their software in the states. osreinstall   | 05/24/06
Non-consequence IT_User   | 05/25/06
Isn't that the title of my post? osreinstall   | 05/25/06
Your post IT_User   | 05/25/06
There will be a change. osreinstall   | 05/25/06
those with patents must be feeling pretty bad tridell   | 05/24/06
Why? All those patents are validated. Anton Philidor   | 05/24/06
"Valdated" perhaps IT_User   | 05/25/06
The software I am currently finishing stan@...   | 05/30/06
This will ultimately stifle innovation IMO Mark Miller   | 05/24/06
software patents are unworkable anyway, because: stevey_d   | 05/25/06
yes Yes YES !!! BanjoPaterson   | 05/25/06
Agreed, acknowledging the validity of all software patents... Anton Philidor   | 05/26/06
SOMEONE'S thinking at the EU! bahamude   | 05/25/06
EU and Software Patents dhopp@...   | 05/25/06
Copyrights not patents SirLanse   | 05/25/06
Patents should be applicable to inventions engineer-inventor   | 05/27/06
This is laughable Shelendrea   | 05/25/06
Making everyone happy Anton Philidor   | 05/25/06
Nothing to laugh .. mad-man   | 05/25/06
This is what the USA needs! kokuryu   | 05/25/06
Don't stop at just software Omch'Ar   | 05/25/06
Hasn't Hepatitis been patented? I am Gorby   | 05/25/06
Finally something to the consumers Nocturna   | 05/26/06
Sigh... So much clulessness! Jxn   | 05/26/06
Added info. Jxn   | 05/26/06
I think you might be clueless. osreinstall   | 05/26/06
Soo? Jxn   | 05/29/06
So what? osreinstall   | 05/31/06
Its hard to know where to start with this one. stan@...   | 05/30/06
Seems that the US is not...[more inside] BlazeEagle   | 05/29/06
Patents more applicable than copyright lrvaught@...   | 05/29/06
No, it isn't Jxn   | 05/29/06
Hepatitis patent... interested_amateur@...   | 05/31/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
  • Printers
  • 'Green' Font Cuts Costs and Saves Trees (BNET)
  • Three Ways to Save Paper (BNET)
  • CNET Reviews printer buying guide (CNET)
  • View all printers-tagged content on ZDNet
  • Plan B from Brother
  • It's the smarter way to work in color Our professional color ink-jet all-in-ones give you more choices, more features, and more value. Make the Smarter Choice. Learn More »
advertisement
Click Here