On GameSpot: We get our hands on Left 4 Dead
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried, News.com
Posted on ZDNet News: Oct 17, 2006 4:00:00 AM

Companies have long known the benefits of making sure their workers get a good night's sleep--and they would be wise to let their PCs do the same, Microsoft says.

With Windows Vista, Microsoft plans to put machines to sleep after an hour of inactivity. While businesses and consumers can change that setting, the software maker said that they would be smart to let their computers nod off.

Microsoft estimates that allowing a PC to go to sleep during off hours, as compared with leaving it on all the time, saves anywhere from $55 a year to $70 annually, depending on the type of monitor.

"This is energy (consumed) when you are not even using the PC," said Dean DeWhitt, a director in the Windows kernel team at Microsoft. "It truly is a waste."

The company has done work in the upcoming Vista update to make sure that the PC can rest more easily. With Windows XP, programs could veto a user's request for the PC to go to sleep. In some cases, that meant that laptop owners thought they had put a PC to sleep, only to discover a few hours later that the machine had remained on and their notebook's battery had been drained.

But Microsoft is hoping to make an even bigger impact with desktops. Today, many businesses leave their computers on at night. Some do it to make sure that they can install security patches.

By adding the new sleep option, businesses can wake machines to install security updates, while letting them remain in the power-saving mode the rest of the time.

Also in Vista, businesses will be able to enforce the power management settings through the group policy tool. That means companies will be able to require, say, that a screen goes blank after 15 minutes of inactivity. Although Windows XP did not have that capability built in, some third-party companies, such as Verdiem, have offered that feature as an add-on.

All that snoozing time could pay off environmentally as well. Microsoft said that by putting six PCs to sleep, rather than leaving them on, businesses can save the same amount of carbon emissions that would otherwise require an acre of trees to absorb. That calculation depends on what means are used to generate the power for the PCs, with the actual energy emissions varying greatly by region.

Only about 10 percent of computers today have power management features enabled, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which runs the Energy Star program designed to highlight products that can save on energy costs.

"We had a lot of success with monitors," said Steven Ryan, who oversees the EPA's power management initiative for computers and monitors. "Now we are trying to get more into PCs."

Tweaks still needed?
While Vista makes some notable steps forward, Bruce Twito, Veridiem's chief technical officer, said that there is plenty that has yet to be fixed in the operating system. Although Microsoft is allowing companies to set policies, Twito said that the group policy options are not flexible enough.

Twito also questions whether businesses will actually be able to remotely wake machines that are set to Vista's sleep mode.

"With the attention being paid to energy waste, organizations will want to do something."
--Bruce Twito, CTO, Veridiem

"The devil is in the details there," Twito said.

Microsoft says, meanwhile, that it has made significant improvements in Vista to support waking a machine over the network.

Veridiem plans to introduce its own Vista-compatible power management software within two months of the general availability of the new operating system. Vista is slated for release to large businesses in November and to the general public in January.

Twito said it is good news to see attention brought to the power wasted by leaving PCs running 24 hours a day.

"With the attention being paid to energy waste, organizations will want to do something," he said.

Today, he said, much of the attention goes to the wrong places. Screen savers, for example, use even more power than just letting a machine idle, since the CPU and even the graphics chip are often needed.

Ever increasing computing needs have meant that over the past 10 years, computers have been gobbling up more and more power, though recent chip advances have the potential to change this somewhat.

Vista is trying to make better use of power while the PC is on, too. In particular, the operating system now supports the same kind of power-throttling features on desktops that have been standard on laptops.

However, the fancy new Aero graphics in Vista are also fairly power-hungry. Testers of the operating system have reported significantly lower battery life while Vista than with XP running on the same machine. Microsoft has said it hopes to have nearly the same battery life with XP by the time Vista launches.

Microsoft had previously said it expected to be able to offer a significant savings in power use with Vista.

"We've done some calculations of power savings that we expect," Windows chief Jim Allchin said in an interview last year. "When 100 million machines are running Vista, the power savings around the world (will be) unbelievable."

The EPA's Ryan said that companies can see a big savings by using power management features, pointing to General Electric which saves $2.5 million a year by using sleep mode on its PCs and monitors. However, Ryan said it is critical that the technology be good enough that computers don't have problems, such as freezing up when a user tries to wake the machine.

"It looks very encouraging," Ryan said, but added, "The product hasn't been released yet."

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 99 Talkback(s)
What are you talking about?
I have an MPC that I run AutoCAD 2007 on. All of my files are on a server. On the keyboard there is a sleep button. When I am done working on a project I just hit the sleep button. When I wake it everything is the same as I left it.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: annihilator4 Posted on: 10/21/06 You are currently: Logged In | Log out
Message has been deleted. defconvegas   | 10/16/06
Sadly the detail often doesn't live up to the MS talk Richard Flude   | 10/16/06
Where is that clearly written? DNSB   | 10/17/06
I will NOT buy VISTA or any other M$ Product DarbyOhara   | 10/16/06
Thanks for the thought... OwningXylophone   | 10/17/06
Nobody cares warawara   | 10/17/06
I don't agree - zoroaster   | 10/17/06
Thanks for nothing opensourcepro   | 10/17/06
doesn't this remind you... zoroaster   | 10/17/06
Wow you guys completely missed the point! rschror   | 10/17/06
awesome.. redtrain65   | 10/17/06
Vista Snoozing yagijd   | 10/17/06
Great Feature! Gerald Quaglia   | 10/17/06
totally out of touch scole3@...   | 10/17/06
There have been numerous patches ... ShadeTree   | 10/17/06
Both you and he are correct...in your own ways:) Laff   | 10/17/06
Actually, not as long as you might think maldain   | 10/17/06
catch up? zoroaster   | 10/17/06
The ineptitude is in the user xuniL_z   | 10/17/06
point taken but scole3@...   | 10/17/06
Setup WSUS on your network. swoopee   | 10/17/06
time to patch deepee912   | 10/17/06
Really? zkiwi   | 10/17/06
Taking you at your word might I ask..... Laff   | 10/17/06
Takes me longer.... deepee912   | 10/17/06
Huh!?! Am I missing something here....that seems poinfully obvious. Laff   | 10/17/06
What MS patch is only 1 or 2 megs? Again, you lie! nomorems   | 10/17/06
Hmmm, what are you patching with that 1-2 meg patch? maldain   | 10/17/06
No way dude. What a freakin liar. nomorems   | 10/17/06
lol xxn1927   | 10/17/06
oh sing it ... scole3@...   | 10/17/06
No virus'? Naw. dayjm   | 10/17/06
I have no AV or Spyware software on my Mac. nomorems   | 10/17/06
You are totally out of touch rschror   | 10/17/06
Another MSFT rep talking point Chad_z   | 10/17/06
This is new? BitTwiddler   | 10/17/06
MS & ZDNet Desperate asad.quraishi@...   | 10/17/06
Millions? jasonp@...   | 10/17/06
Basic Math gsquared   | 10/17/06
Didn't they this before? Macs have had it for over 10 years j.m.galvin   | 10/17/06
nope.... JoeMama_z   | 10/17/06
These are bios settings, not OS settings deepee912   | 10/17/06
Yet another lie. nomorems   | 10/17/06
I remember... nix_hed   | 10/17/06
Microsoft is fishing again....... linux for me   | 10/17/06
Another reason to love Vista xuniL_z   | 10/17/06
Free support? zkiwi   | 10/17/06
Yes, free support xuniL_z   | 10/17/06
Ah, not the paid support then zkiwi   | 10/17/06
Sl;eep,service, and support kbrown434   | 10/17/06
Mike Cox is that you? maldain   | 10/17/06
"it's only a matter of time." hirez   | 10/17/06
So Vista is NOT multi-processor multi-core capable mighetto   | 10/17/06
Windows on Multi-core/Multi-CPU/Multi-Thread gsquared   | 10/17/06
Why do you keep... msolgeek   | 10/17/06
How can you be wrong everytime you post? No_Ax_to_Grind   | 10/17/06
Vista Keith.knutsson   | 10/17/06
The not so helpful sleep feature Badgered   | 10/17/06
That setting is device specific deepee912   | 10/17/06
What are you talking about? annihilator4   | 10/21/06
Never too late polythene   | 10/17/06
Vista's snoozing JohnLearner02   | 10/17/06
Gads man... jskline@...   | 10/17/06
Vista snoozing npchilds@...   | 10/17/06
I love ZDnet ! hirez   | 10/17/06
No Snooze is Good Snooze OlDewd   | 10/17/06
Sleep bad, Hibernate good. nix_hed   | 10/17/06
Here's a BRILLIANT thought...... shut the damn computer off... shawkins   | 10/17/06
Here Here! rschror   | 10/17/06
Vista and Sleep dcheney8@...   | 10/17/06
how.... JoeMama_z   | 10/17/06
Vista Jafrh   | 10/17/06
Rubbish! ( What about the ) Sustainabilly   | 10/17/06
WTF? Energy saver, anyone? nomorems   | 10/17/06
Vista - 50% more smoke and mirrors! Chad_z   | 10/17/06
or save money with Grid computing dlmeyer@...   | 10/17/06
Bold assumption... techboy_z   | 10/17/06
All you little home users can bash No_Ax_to_Grind   | 10/17/06
Well... zkiwi   | 10/17/06
Good Point, but I don't think it was XP rschror   | 10/17/06
ROFL! Chad_z   | 10/17/06
this will get the interest of the enterprize. hirez   | 10/17/06
Cap'n Enterprise Ole Man   | 10/17/06
Reoly to yagijd: Vista Snoozing LegendsOfBatman   | 10/17/06
Well, you're one lucky mac user then LegendsOfBatman   | 10/17/06
Dang! Reverend MacFellow   | 10/17/06
macs are more expensive? nix_hed   | 10/17/06
macs are more expensive? nix_hed   | 10/17/06
beating god- another joker here! hirez   | 10/17/06
Um, no ewelch   | 10/17/06
What's the big deal? zoroaster   | 10/17/06
absolutely rschror   | 10/17/06
Now its a feature ? SikosisZDNet   | 10/17/06
"new feature" that as funny as mac ****! hirez   | 10/17/06
No Comment Ole Man   | 10/17/06
Vista- Snoozing since 2001 hirez   | 10/17/06
But in television your Sysop1984   | 10/17/06
WOW!! pkrdk   | 10/17/06
Utterly Lame! marlinj@...   | 10/19/06

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

Whitepapers & Webcasts

advertisement
Click Here