On TV.com: 2009's Most PIRATED TV Show
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Munir Kotadia
Posted on ZDNet News: Nov 25, 2003 4:48:00 PM

The court case between Microsoft and desktop Linux-maker Lindows.com, over Microsoft's ownership of the word 'windows', has been delayed for at least another three months.

The jury trial, which was supposed to get under way earlier this year, was delayed by the judge to give Lindows.com more time sift through documents relating to the 1992 case between Apple and Microsoft. In that case, Microsoft successfully argued that it had not infringed on Apple's copyright because the Mac OS's windowed GUI had been used by other companies. Lindows is similarly arguing that the word 'windows' was widely used before Microsoft appeared on the scene, so it cannot be 'owned'.

This time, the U.S. District Court in Seattle has rescheduled the trial for 1 March, 2004, because of a "scheduling conflict".

The case started in December 2001, when Microsoft sued Lindows and asked a judge to shut down the company's site. The software giant claimed Lindows was using a name that infringed its trademark on its flagship product, Windows. Microsoft contended Lindows was purposefully trying to mislead people by using a name similar to Windows.

However, later that year, US District Judge John Coughenour refused Microsoft's request to close the Lindows site, questioning whether the company even had the right to the word "windows". Microsoft asked the judge to reconsider, but after reviewing the case further, he again refused to shut down the Lindows site.

Bolstered by those rulings, Lindows asked the judge to toss out the case altogether, arguing that Microsoft's trademark is invalid because "windows" is a generic term. Instead, Coughenour said that both sides have presented substantial evidence in their favor, and a jury should decide the matter.

"The test of evaluating whether a term is generic for a class of goods is the primary significance of the term to the relevant public," Coughenour wrote.

CNET News.com's Lisa M. Bowman contributed to this report.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 64 Talkback(s)
Too late IBM beat them to it when they were
in the antitrust hotseat. Amazing the decades of change. (Read the rest)
Posted by: FilledOut Posted on: 12/04/03 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Don't argue  FilledOut | 11/25/03
Because I don't like Linux, I don't like Lindows.  GraysonPeddie | 11/25/03
so?  ryusen | 11/25/03
Microsoft also suing Pella and Andersen  Uncoveror | 11/30/03
Because I do like Linux, I don't like Lindows.  Michael Kelly | 11/25/03
Dispelling FUD  voska | 11/25/03
m$ should copyright...  stephen732@... | 11/27/03
So? You support DRM?  #team-fo-Chivalrous | 11/27/03
M$ can't have it all !  NT Admin | 11/25/03
Microsoft should move on, no reason to give more free publicity  DonnieBoy | 11/25/03
So true  neil ubich | 11/25/03
well...  stephen732@... | 11/25/03
Oh, come on, people..  Delaware Boy | 11/25/03
uh huh...  neil ubich | 11/25/03
Lindows failed its promise  Bill Weisgerber | 11/25/03
what does lindows quality have to do with it?  ryusen | 11/25/03
What are you doing?  Martin Marvinski | 11/26/03
but...  ryusen | 11/26/03
Wrong  BitBytesAx | 11/25/03
Maybe, maybe not, Ax!  Bill Weisgerber | 11/26/03
Why the hoopla over the geneology?  IT_User | 11/26/03
Forums are for flames, silly!  Bill Weisgerber | 11/26/03
trademark?  stephen732@... | 11/25/03
Nah, they should call it...  myndlon@... | 11/25/03
or...  stephen732@... | 11/27/03
I don't agree  voska | 11/25/03
Lindows not based on Corel...  John Le'Brecage | 11/25/03
Maybe, maybe not, John  Bill Weisgerber | 11/26/03
Basically MS can't compete....  Rick_K | 11/25/03
Yeah, it'll never fly  IT_User | 11/26/03
"that dude"  gsbtech | 11/25/03
Try to imagine the trial  IT_User | 11/25/03
Of course, but...  Robert Carnegie | 11/26/03
bah!  ryusen | 11/25/03
Delay is both good and bad.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/25/03
Shirley  BitBytesAx | 11/25/03
Another Fan boy!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/25/03
What have you been smoking bitty?  Rick_K | 11/25/03
$1.95 will hardly bother MS.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 11/25/03
You can come up with....  Rick_K | 11/25/03
Brand recognition is an iffy thing  FilledOut | 11/25/03
no kidding  lmaxwell | 11/25/03
Like the Canadian Government  IT_User | 11/26/03
MS has no real case  nut_cracker | 11/25/03
ok  voska | 11/25/03
hmmm  lmaxwell | 11/25/03
Changing the letters  boatelc | 11/26/03
i thought this was a done deal  lmaxwell | 11/25/03
Lindows should lose  d_jedi | 11/25/03
confuse consumers into believing it's the real thing..  NemesisNL | 11/26/03
Absolutely.  d_jedi | 11/26/03
I was disapointed  nut_cracker | 11/26/03
But the difference is..  d_jedi | 11/26/03
That is the issue  IT_User | 11/26/03
The issues..  d_jedi | 11/26/03
But you forget.  Rick_K | 11/27/03
Good point!  DarbyOhara | 11/26/03
coke or cola  bjornafreeman@... | 11/26/03
And in this case...  IT_User | 11/26/03
Intel or lintel (that's "Lintel", for the last one)  d_jedi | 11/27/03
Message has been deleted.  cadsoftw@... | 11/26/03
..  d_jedi | 11/26/03
I have to wash my glass paned orifices on my house  Squawkbox | 11/28/03
Too late IBM beat them to it when they were  FilledOut | 12/04/03

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here