On mySimon: Toys Of The Year Award Winners
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried
Posted on ZDNet News: Dec 15, 2003 6:43:00 PM

Microsoft plans to reorganize its Windows unit, creating a new division more tightly focused on the development of the core operating system, CNET News.com has learned.

The new Windows Core division will be headed by Brian Valentine, according to a source familiar with the company's plans. Valentine currently serves as senior vice president of the existing Windows unit.

The move to have a unit dedicated more exclusively to development work comes as Microsoft is ramping up efforts around Longhorn, the next major version of Windows, which is expected to be released in late 2005 or 2006. Other software makers, including Oracle, have set up units focused on core technology in the past, leaving the work of creating specific products to separate teams.

Such a move would more narrowly focus Valentine's responsibilities, one analyst said.

"He's a very inspiring leader, and I think he really motivates the technical teams," said Rob Helm, an analyst with Directions on Microsoft, an independent market research firm.

A Microsoft representative declined comment. The company is expected to announce the reorganization later on Monday.

The reorganization would more clearly separate Microsoft's product units from those developing the core operating system. While much of the company's development efforts focus on new versions of the operating system, those that run the company's software are often working with products that are one or two versions old.

For example, a study released last week found that only 6.6 percent of businesses are running the up-to-date Windows XP issue of the operating system. Half of businesses are on the relatively modern Windows 2000, but more than a quarter are still using Windows 95 or Windows 98, products that are at or nearing end-of-life status from a support perspective.

Longhorn is seen as a critical development project for Microsoft. The company plans to offer both server and desktop operating systems based on the new technology and will also tie the release of a new version of Office and several pieces of server software to the arrival of Longhorn.

Analysts have cautioned that such a strategy could leave the company vulnerable if the core Longhorn technology takes longer than expected to arrive. Microsoft, which earlier said that Longhorn would arrive in 2005, now refuses to say when it will be released, typically stating that the operating system will ship when it is ready.

Longhorn consists of several new components, including a new file storage architecture known as WinFS, a graphics engine dubbed Avalon, and Indigo, a new communications subsystem. It will also feature a new user interface, dubbed Aero.

In addition to his role within the Windows unit, Valentine was an early advocate for the company's Trustworthy Computing initiative, Helm said. That effort, aimed at making the company's code more secure, has taken on heightened importance amid several prominent threats this year, including MSBlast and SoBig.

Microsoft has said repeatedly in recent months that security is its top priority, but the software giant still faces criticism that it has not done enough to shore up its products. The company has responded by changing some of the settings within current versions of Windows and offering promises that future software will be designed to be more secure than current products.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 26 Talkback(s)
Other DOSs, OS2, BeOS ...
>>> Who are these rivals that you are talking about ? (remember we are talking about pre-installing OS on desktop machines). Microsoft had only one major rival on desktop OS market. >>>

Which w... (Read the rest)
Posted by: MacCanuck Posted on: 12/16/03 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Very strategic, should kill open source  Mike Cox | 12/15/03
Good eats  rgriffith64@... | 12/15/03
...and with security issues solved..  moiety | 12/15/03
slow day?  ryusen | 12/15/03
Really a smart move. They need to make Windows more modular.  DonnieBoy | 12/15/03
of course  JWatson77 | 12/15/03
Lawsuits a-plenty  jellyclock | 12/15/03
Nah! That would interfere with M$'s business model: monopoly + lock-in.  dicktaurus@... | 12/15/03
Hogwash...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 12/15/03
Ok  Patrick Jones | 12/15/03
ok  voska | 12/15/03
Maybe true today...  WhoIsDaMan | 12/15/03
IBM never had the Monopoly  voska | 12/15/03
Re:Nah! That would interfere with M$'s business model: monopoly + lock-in.  mbraincell@... | 12/15/03
Cannot generalize based on case studies...  Carl Rogers | 12/15/03
Re: Cannot generalize based on case studies...  mbraincell@... | 12/15/03
I find the opposite  LazLong | 12/15/03
Of course  GRindinAxTaRupy | 12/15/03
Re: Of course  mbraincell@... | 12/15/03
Other DOSs, OS2, BeOS ...  MacCanuck | 12/16/03
Of course it is  WhoIsDaMan | 12/15/03
This why MS is on top  voska | 12/15/03
OK, you got us..  Don Bradley | 12/15/03
My Win98 PC had Netscape preloaded  voska | 12/15/03
funny a software company would not already have a group dedicated to develo  JWatson77 | 12/15/03
My Rep buys all my food  fastech@... | 12/15/03

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here