On mySimon: LG Electronics 32LH40 32" LCD TV
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By David Becker
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 23, 2004 8:24:00 PM

Microsoft has applied for patents that could prevent competing applications from processing documents created with the latest version of the software giant's Office program.

The company filed patent applications in New Zealand and the European Union that cover word processing documents stored in the XML (Extensible Markup Language) format. The proposed patent would cover methods for an application other than the original word processor to access data in the document. The U.S. Patent Office had no record of a similar application.

News.context

What's new:
Microsoft applies for patents that could prevent competing applications from reading documents created with the latest version of Office.

Bottom line:
XML capabilities have been one of the main selling points for Office 2003. The patents could create a barrier for competing software, such as future versions of OpenOffice and StarOffice, from working with Microsoft's XML format.

More stories on this topic

The inventors cited in the European application have filed identical U.S. and European applications covering other XML-related topics. Those applications, however, appear to relate to how a word processor parses XML code rather than how that code is shared with other applications.

Microsoft representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

XML-based capabilities have been one of the main selling points for Office 2003, the new version of the market-leading software package. By saving documents as XML files, the new Office will allow back-end computing systems such as corporate databases to retrieve and reuse data from documents. XML support also allows Office to become a client for viewing and manipulating data from Web services and complex enterprise applications, such as customer relationship management software.

The proposed patents apparently seek to protect methods other applications could use to interpret the XML dialect, or schema, Office uses to describe and organize information in documents. Microsoft recently agreed to publish those schemas and is looking at opening other chunks of Office code.

Despite those moves toward openness, the patents could create a barrier to competing software, said Rob Helm, an analyst for research firm Directions on Microsoft.

"This is a direct challenge to software vendors who want to interoperate with Word through XML," he said. "For example, if Corel wanted to improve WordPerfect's support of Word by adopting its XML format...for import/export, they'd probably have to license this patent."

The patents likely wouldn't immediately affect the open-source software package OpenOffice, which uses different XML techniques to describe a document, Helm said. But they could prevent future versions of OpenOffice and StarOffice, its proprietary sibling, from working with Microsoft's XML format.

Analyst Matt Rosoff, also with Directions on Microsoft, said the proposed patents fit with recent moves by Microsoft--such as the licensing of FAT (file allocation table) systems and ClearType font technology--to be more aggressive in licensing its intellectual property.

"In the last few months, we're sort of seeing more emphasis from Microsoft on turning its patents into a revenue source," Rosoff said.

Microsoft isn't the only technology company facing a difficult balancing act between making money and supporting open standards such as XML, Rosoff added.

"Microsoft has always played an interesting game when it comes to standards," he said. "They're going to support them as necessary to get technology broadly adopted. But at the same time, they're an (intellectual property) company. That's the case with any big business."

Sam Hiser, who handles marketing for OpenOffice.org, doubted the application would go far given the wide array of precedents for applications sharing XML data.

"I think it's going to be a non-issue, legally. I just don't think the patent will be accepted," he said. "This is Microsoft doing its aggressive best to protect its interests."

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 82 Talkback(s)
Ern ope
Still sticking with the start of my thread. To each their own opinion of the situation. (Read the rest)
Posted by: FilledOut Posted on: 01/27/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Holy XML Batman  FilledOut | 01/23/04
Nail, coffin  LightningShrike | 01/23/04
Nail, coffin  NoB$ | 01/23/04
Itll be a competition  LightningShrike | 01/23/04
Why not a Linux shill????  vferrara | 01/23/04
But where's the funding?  tic swayback | 01/23/04
But where's the funding?  nrlz | 01/24/04
This is a stupid thread  Martin Marvinski | 01/24/04
Linus?  ryusen | 01/23/04
2 words: George Soros  Art Jones2 | 01/26/04
change laws  stephen732@... | 01/23/04
Can't you guys see this is a facetious post  vferrara | 01/26/04
Not Linus, more like IBM, HP, AOL,  FilledOut | 01/24/04
It wont fly  OhMyGosh | 01/23/04
it's not XML...  in-DUH-vidual | 01/23/04
silly rabit  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
I'm confused...  jesusgeek | 01/23/04
Not so easy in Europe  FirstNLastN | 01/23/04
What are the visiting hours on my documents?  Nigel Johnstone | 01/23/04
Yes, this is just one more way to enrage customers.  DonnieBoy | 01/23/04
Remember Office 97?  issthatso | 01/23/04
Remember it?  Eggs Ackley_z | 01/23/04
M$'s attempt to further proprietize Office is already doomed to failure.  dicktaurus@... | 01/23/04
So much for open standards...  prime21 | 01/23/04
Right! Mico$oft NEVER means OPEN standards! (NT)  dicktaurus@... | 01/23/04
Software patents are bad!!!  vferrara | 01/23/04
I must agree  LightningShrike | 01/23/04
Maybe not  voska | 01/23/04
OK John Carroll...  Cardinal_Bill | 01/23/04
LOL - they have heads in sand somewhere  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
Patend Technology Not Data Formats  michael-t | 01/23/04
Er... anybody read the patents?  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Can you hear me now???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/23/04
Loud and Clear  LightningShrike | 01/23/04
don't take it too seriously...  ryusen | 01/23/04
Nope  voska | 01/23/04
Read the Patents - not the poor reporting  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
You and Bruce Perens seem to agree  tic swayback | 01/23/04
don't say things like that....  ryusen | 01/23/04
Who do you think told Perens??? grin  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/23/04
If they're so cheap, how will it lock them out?  tic swayback | 01/23/04
you were told it would be cheap  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
If you don't use office what does it matter?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/24/04
I guess unlike you, I care about people  JWatson77 | 01/24/04
Save the insults for your family members.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/25/04
Here's one for you...  Patrick Jones | 01/26/04
To Patrick...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
It's the content of the license.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/24/04
Bundling proprietary with OSS  tic swayback | 01/24/04
Once again, I agree with Bit. Neat!  Damon K | 01/23/04
Microsoft trying to show how stupid they are????  DonnieBoy | 01/23/04
Easy, it's just a patent...  IT_User | 01/23/04
Who said anything about patenting a data format?  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
You have got to be kidding  serpentmage | 01/23/04
Finally - someone took the time to read the patent...  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Next up, the GNU Public Patent.  DonnieBoy | 01/23/04
Already sort of have that.  Robert Crocker | 01/24/04
A patent is merely that.  IT_User | 01/23/04
two statements from MS:  ryusen | 01/23/04
Go read the patent...  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Next up, the GNU Public Patent.  DonnieBoy | 01/23/04
Different topic, same old strategy.  chiishen | 01/23/04
Read the patent  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Oh  ParadigmOdyssey | 01/23/04
Patent this!  Eggs Ackley_z | 01/23/04
Okay, that does it, I'm patenting something!  el1jones | 01/23/04
patent this  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
I can't think of a better reason . . .  James Dean_z | 01/23/04
gee - didn't see this coming did we  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
Didn't see what?  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
OpenOffice getting to good to compete on quality  JWatson77 | 01/23/04
An MS user ready to evaluate the switch.  jimk_z | 01/23/04
Shareholders...  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Corel (Corehell), Lotus Smartsuite, MS Ofc all doOmed  FilledOut | 01/24/04
COUGH... COUGH...  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
COUGH... COUGH...  Sam_Lowry | 01/24/04
Wheeze Wheeze . . .  FilledOut | 01/25/04
Er nope  Sam_Lowry | 01/25/04
Ern ope  FilledOut | 01/27/04
MS: Office will use XML and will be open as long as it is convenient  George Jay | 01/24/04
They will come out with some fromat that makes the world have to upgrade.  boatelc | 01/24/04
You know...  BitTwiddler | 01/24/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here