On mySimon: 2009 Mercedes-Benz SLK-Class
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By David Becker
Posted on ZDNet News: Jan 26, 2004 11:56:00 PM

Recent patent applications filed by Microsoft are routine moves and don't reflect a change in the company's position on Extensible Markup Language, according to a spokesman for the software maker.

As previously reported, Microsoft has filed applications for numerous XML-related patents in the United States, Europe and New Zealand. The patents deal with the way its Office software processes XML, the fast-growing standard for exchanging data among disparate computing systems.

XML-based capabilities have been one of the main selling points for Office 2003, the recently released version of Microsoft's market-leading productivity package. By saving documents as XML files, Office allows back-end computing systems, such as corporate databases, to retrieve and reuse data from those documents. XML support also allows Office to become a client for viewing and manipulating data from Web services and from complex enterprise applications such as customer relationship management (CRM) software.

Analysts said some of the proposed patents could prevent competing applications from opening XML files created in Office. "This is a direct challenge to software vendors who want to interoperate with Word through XML," according to Rob Helm, of research firm Directions on Microsoft. "For example, if Corel wanted to improve WordPerfect's support of Word by adopting its XML format...for import/export, they'd probably have to license this patent."

Microsoft spokesman Mark Martin said the company couldn't comment on how the patents, if granted, might be applied or licensed. But he said such applications are standard moves for the company to protect its innovations and don't affect its commitment to openly sharing the XML schemas used by Office.

"While the XML standard itself is royalty-free, nothing precludes a company from seeking patent protection for a specific software implementation that incorporates elements of XML," Martin said. "The presence of this patent application...does nothing to change the commitment Microsoft made this past November when it announced the available of a royalty-free licensing program for our Office 2003 XML reference schemas."

Martin added that numerous technology companies have sought XML-related patents. A search of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office shows hundreds of applications for patents related to the processing of XML code. "This is an industry-standard means of differentiation followed by other major companies," Martin said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 69 Talkback(s)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly
The answer is in the basic definition of a monopoly. If you lack sufficient knowledge of how a monopoly is able to abuse it's powerful position, please read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly.... (Read the rest)
Posted by: ioot@... Posted on: 08/10/09 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
New patents are just a part of existing E3 policy.  jdoe512 | 01/26/04
So what about the hundreds of other XML patents  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
Pattern of behavior  jasonp@... | 01/26/04
Why its no big deal  OhMyGosh | 01/26/04
It's a patent - get over it  rock06r | 01/27/04
(NT) No more a big deal than bolting apps like IE or Mplayer to the OS :o)  Jack-Booted EULA | 01/26/04
Grandma, what big teeth you have...  Xunil_Sierutuf | 01/26/04
We'll soon find out their intentions  John L. Ries | 01/26/04
Intentions are obvious to those that see.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
Re: Intentions are obvious to those that see  issthatso | 01/26/04
It's not just Office.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
Yes, but NO ONE will be using Blowhorn...  SloooeShflu | 01/26/04
It's not just that anybody cares, either.  NoB$ | 01/26/04
Long in the tooth horn  tic swayback | 01/26/04
Wonder if they will do that with what they copied from Mozilla?  B.O.F.H. | 01/26/04
Sorry folks, you're. Come back in two years and see.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
Couldn't that statement work for Linux??  SloooeShflu | 01/26/04
You wish  Ployd_Farker | 01/26/04
Most??? You mean 1% don't you.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
What??!!  Ployd_Farker | 01/26/04
Love the butterfly  CaptainObvious | 01/26/04
Improvement cycles  voska | 01/26/04
100 times or 13 years?  rock06r | 01/27/04
Definition of most of the planet  rock06r | 01/27/04
speaking of your mother  Ployd_Farker | 01/27/04
...that effectively kicks open source to the curb...?  NoB$ | 01/26/04
That doesn't make any sense at all  voska | 01/26/04
They already did  Sam_Lowry | 01/26/04
Better than I expected  John L. Ries | 01/26/04
Yea right, we can trust Microsoft!!!!  DonnieBoy | 01/26/04
Why do you care, you don't use MS products.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
You NEVER seem to mind bashing linux...  SloooeShflu | 01/26/04
NO, I bash NOTHING.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
Ok, but try arguing why you think we can trust Microsoft.  DonnieBoy | 01/26/04
why indeed...  ryusen | 01/26/04
why indeed...  NoB$ | 01/26/04
But if you don't use MS Office, why worry?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
For the short term, Linux users need to read MS docs.  DonnieBoy | 01/26/04
Why do you care  NoB$ | 01/26/04
Aw, down to name calling again.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
what do you care?  JWatson77 | 01/26/04
Not whining, laughing.  DonnieBoy | 01/26/04
Maybe it's because...  John L. Ries | 01/27/04
Saddam Hussein: WMDs are no big deal (NT)  jnonneman | 01/26/04
Interesting analogy  Sam_Lowry | 01/26/04
And they didn't find those either...  TheWerewolf | 01/26/04
Microsoft's intentions  Michael Kelly | 01/26/04
Read the patent  Sam_Lowry | 01/26/04
Where can I read the patent application?  el1jones | 01/26/04
GPL the schema  Nigel Johnstone | 01/26/04
Why would they help open source?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
Technically, a for-profit software company has no obligation, but...  Taz_z | 01/26/04
Aw, you mean hand outs and welfare.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
Exactly...IBM's spent a lot of time collecting food stamps lately, eh?...  SloooeShflu | 01/26/04
Hardware  rapson | 01/26/04
It's not about helping OSS  Michael Kelly | 01/26/04
If they are using oos, they aren't an MS customer.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 01/26/04
There's a LOT more OSS than OOo  Michael Kelly | 01/26/04
OS neutral  davidpz@... | 01/27/04
For one thing...  John L. Ries | 01/26/04
Patent on writing?  solprovider | 01/26/04
They're not... it's just bad reporting  Sam_Lowry | 01/26/04
Ever feel like a broken record?  rapson | 01/26/04
Agreed  rock06r | 01/27/04
Was I wrong?  solprovider | 01/31/04
re " Microsoft: XML patent moves no big deal  JWatson77 | 01/26/04
Explain-Anyone, PLEASE  rock06r | 01/27/04
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly  ioot@... | 08/10/09
IBM, largest patent holder, no big deal  FilledOut | 01/27/04

What do you think?

SmartPlanet

Click Here