On CBS MoneyWatch: 5 Things You Should Buy at Walmart
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By James Pearce
Posted on ZDNet News: Feb 6, 2004 2:29:00 PM

A music industry group on Friday raided the Australian offices of peer-to-peer companies Sharman Networks and Brilliant Digital Entertainment, along with the homes of key executives and several Internet service providers.

Music Industry Piracy Investigations obtained a so-called Anton Piller order Thursday from Justice Murray Wilcox, and began raiding premises in Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria on Friday searching for documents and electronic evidence to support its case against the peer-to-peer companies. The order allows a copyright holder to enter premises to search for and seize material that breaches copyright, without alerting the target through court proceedings.


Full court press
Three years of Kazaa
lawsuits
Suit hits popular post-Napster
network (Oct. 3, 2001)

Ruling bolsters file-traders'
prospects (March 28, 2001)

Kazaa steps out of the
shadows (Apr. 23, 2002)

Judge OKs suit against
Kazaa parent (July 9, 2002)

Kazaa strikes back at
Hollywood, labels (Jan. 27, 2003)

Judge: File-swapping tools
are legal
(Apr. 25, 2003)


In addition to the offices of Sharman Networks, which runs the Kazaa network, and Brilliant Digital Entertainment, MIPI raided the residences of Sharman Networks CEO Nikki Hemming, Brilliant Digital CEO Kevin Burmeister, and Phil Morle, director of technology at Sharman. Monash University, the University of Queensland and the University of New South Wales also were raided, as well as four ISPs including Telstra.

"Telstra lawyers are presently working with lawyers from the record labels in order to determine exactly what information is being sought under the terms of the order," Telstra spokesman Warwick Ponder told ZDNet Australia. "We have not been asked for and will not provide any BigPond (an Internet access service) subscriber information.

"Telstra has made it very clear for a long time now that it does not support copyright infringement or any other illegal activity. At the same time, Telstra clearly respects its obligation to protect customers' information and privacy under the Telecommunication Act and Privacy Act under federal law."

MIPI general manager Michael Speck told ZDNet Australia that the order was specifically intended to gather evidence about the operators of the Kazaa network. "This is not about individuals; this is about the big fish," Speck said. "This is a signal that Internet music piracy is finished in Australia."

The investigation into the Kazaa network has been ongoing for six months, and was precipitated by a significant change in the physical and technical infrastructure at Sharman, according to Speck. "The Kazaa operation infringes copyright within the terms of the Australian Copyright Act," he said.

Sharman took issue with that claim.

"This action appears to be an extraordinary waste of time, money and resources going over legal ground that has been well and truly covered in the U.S. and Dutch courts over the past 18 months," the company said in a statement. "This is a knee-jerk reaction by the recording industry to discredit Sharman Networks and the Kazaa software, following a number of recent court decisions around the world that have ruled against the entertainment industry's agenda to stamp out peer-to-peer technology."

Sharman became a target for the music industry when it purchased the Kazaa peer-to-peer file-sharing technology from its Dutch creator, Kazaa BV, in 2002. It has had a long relationship with Brilliant Digital, and in 2002 had to defend against a backlash when it was revealed that spyware had been included with the Kazaa software. Brilliant Digital subsidiary Altnet was later formed and offered to pay people for hosting content on the Kazaa network.

"Kazaa operators know the difference and make the decision as to whether they facilitate legitimate or illegitimate downloads," Speck said. "It's very clear they are facilitating and authorizing global copyright infringement."

Sharman disagreed, claiming it bought the Kazaa software with the "express purpose" of creating a legitimate channel through which to distribute licensed, copyright-protected content.

"There is no doubt this is a cynical attempt by the industry to disrupt our business, regain lost momentum and garner publicity," Sharman said. "The assertions by plaintiffs are hackneyed and worn out. It is a gross misrepresentation of Sharman's business to suggest that the company in any way facilitates or encourages copyright infringement."

Monash University and the University of Queensland have challenged the order, and the arguments were expected to be heard Friday afternoon.

Sharman, Australian subsidiary LEF Interactive and Brilliant Digital will face the record company lawyers before Wilcox on Tuesday.

According to MIPI, which is part of the Australian Recording Industry Association, there are around 3 million users simultaneously online and connected to the Kazaa network at any one time, sharing around 573 million files. More than 850,000 tracks are made available by over 2,500 Australian users. If each downloaded track were purchased for 99 cents--the going rate at sites such as Apple Computer's iTunes--the total would be more than $2 billion per month globally.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 124 Talkback(s)
Time for a class-action RICO suiot against the RIAA
I think it is time that the public gather together to file a class action RICO suit against the RIAA. They are definitely employing racketerring tactics to try to extend the life of an obsolete busin... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Spikey-01 Posted on: 03/04/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Sharman willl sue the bejeezus out of the RIAA piglets!!  Bobby Sskcat | 02/06/04
Thank god for the Piracy Freedom Fighters!  LinuxDoesntCrash | 02/06/04
So what were they looking for?  voska | 02/06/04
They were looking for intimidation  tic swayback | 02/06/04
Anton Pilar order abused  Nigel Johnstone | 02/06/04
Are you actually accusing the music industry of misusing a law??  James T. Kirk | 02/06/04
More privacy invasions  Update victim | 02/06/04
This the part that doesn't make sense  voska | 02/06/04
Judge scolds RIAA lawyers for use of the word "theft"  tic swayback | 02/06/04
Gee, guess who is noticably absent in this talkeback?  AbsolutelyNot | 02/06/04
Vigilantes alive and well  Squawkbox | 02/06/04
What happened? The Patriot Act in the United States  AbsolutelyNot | 02/06/04
Tactics like this....  Nullifidian | 02/06/04
Looks Like Down Undrer is a Police State  RobertoSalazar | 02/06/04
Let's see if I get this right...  Fred Fredrickson | 02/08/04
Corporate raiders and the reasons I don't support music anymore  FilledOut | 02/06/04
if of course  JWatson77 | 02/06/04
Yup, this inspires me to buy more music...  buxxmaster | 02/06/04
Time to hit them where it HURTS  toomuchgreeatea@... | 02/06/04
so what did they garner?  JWatson77 | 02/06/04
blah blah blah piracy rocks!!!!!  cybershoplifter | 02/06/04
Several thoughts on this:  AbsolutelyNot | 02/06/04
One simple question if I may.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
A simple answer  Bobby Sskcat | 02/06/04
No answer at all... TechDiva???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
Perhaps she is employed Bittie..  Bobby Sskcat | 02/06/04
And again, you failed the simple test.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
Spoken as an expert  tic swayback | 02/06/04
No evasion  AbsolutelyNot | 02/06/04
TechDiva - It's the stupid tree structure.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
tic, here's your answer.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
Double standard  tic swayback | 02/07/04
tic, another simple question.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/07/04
Not so straightforward  tic swayback | 02/08/04
bit why on earth are you still here?  Always Annoyed | 02/09/04
Thank you!  AbsolutelyNot | 02/06/04
Simple answer for the simple-minded BitByte  MitchDev | 02/06/04
Hmmm, who is simple minded if they don't understand IP?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
Still evading the question and the truth  MitchDev | 02/06/04
blh blah blah piracy rocks  cybershoplifter | 02/07/04
Good points!  AbsolutelyNot | 02/06/04
Sorry Mitchdev...  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/07/04
A Simple Question (Yes/No)  The Real Bitch | 02/06/04
An eye for an eye  voska | 02/06/04
Errata.  d_jedi | 02/07/04
Irrelevant  tic swayback | 02/06/04
Honesty and integrity = Irrelevant ???  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
Totally irrelevant to the subject  tic swayback | 02/06/04
When does honesty and integrity become irrelevant tic?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
blah blah blah piracy rocks  cybershoplifter | 02/07/04
Relevant, but not how you think  tic swayback | 02/07/04
Did I miss something here  voska | 02/06/04
bwuahaha ha ha ha bitty  Always Annoyed | 02/09/04
In the context of my posting  AbsolutelyNot | 02/06/04
a simply leading, but irrelevant question  ryusen | 02/06/04
A simple question for bit.  bjornafreeman@... | 02/07/04
You made an assumption....  tgrady | 02/09/04
We got your answer right over here No Ax!  Zandletweef | 02/09/04
Music sales are down for numerous reasons  voska | 02/09/04
There are so many right ways to take it.  maxo_z | 02/10/04
One slight change  maxo_z | 02/10/04
Thoughts in response  tic swayback | 02/06/04
Just some comments...  mijohnso69 | 02/09/04
Simply Wrong  ParadigmOdyssey | 02/06/04
Microsoft Next  MitchDev | 02/06/04
Nice reminder  AbsolutelyNot | 02/06/04
WTF  boatelc | 02/06/04
Under the Anton Pilar ruling  AbsolutelyNot | 02/06/04
Actual  MitchDev | 02/06/04
The Ten Commandments For Bittie/No_Ax  The Real Bitch | 02/06/04
I am glad you AGREE with me!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/07/04
OT-No_Ax: Yoo, Hoo!  AbsolutelyNot | 02/06/04
Sorry, I see none.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/06/04
i see more dodging than debating (nt)  ryusen | 02/06/04
Judge told Lawyer to Shut UP with T word  cybershoplifter | 02/07/04
blah blah blah piracy rocks  cybershoplifter | 02/07/04
Please help us out of this awful mess  cybershoplifter | 02/07/04
Is this you or someone you know?  AbsolutelyNot | 02/10/04
Hope you see this  AbsolutelyNot | 02/10/04
All Men Created Equal  ParadigmOdyssey | 02/06/04
let's get a few things straight  mehpistopheles_in_concert | 02/07/04
A simple question for no_axe  d_jedi | 02/07/04
Did they do it legally?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/07/04
The law.  Jack-Booted EULA | 02/07/04
Why don't you ask your minister?  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/08/04
Still can't answer a simple question?  MitchDev | 02/08/04
I asked my Minister  tic swayback | 02/08/04
I asked mine, too.  tgrady | 02/09/04
Sorry, but according to the LAW  MitchDev | 02/08/04
Because a minister would likely not know.....  Jack-Booted EULA | 02/08/04
What does mythology have to do with this?  NoB$ | 02/08/04
Still waiting for an answer, Ax.  Jack-Booted EULA | 02/09/04
The Law - ALL of it  panic1 | 02/08/04
The Law - ALL of it  NoB$ | 02/08/04
Correct error  NoB$ | 02/08/04
Yeah, but ...  panic1 | 02/08/04
Doesn't matter.  Jack-Booted EULA | 02/09/04
(NT) Appears that ZDNet has a limit on the size of post... :o)  Jack-Booted EULA | 02/09/04
The Law in the US  Siglaw | 02/09/04
So by your logic  MitchDev | 02/07/04
Absolutely, let's start with you!!!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 02/08/04
No you are  MitchDev | 02/08/04
Laws  voska | 02/09/04
Good  d_jedi | 02/08/04
Quotes from Families Sued by RIAA  cybershoplifter | 02/07/04
pirates  lotta_anger | 02/07/04
ARIA bordering on criminal actions  NoB$ | 02/07/04
Some good points, but ...  panic1 | 02/08/04
Don't misunderstand me  NoB$ | 02/08/04
Appreciate your viewpoint, but ...  panic1 | 02/08/04
points  Always Annoyed | 02/09/04
You Cannot Copywrite SOUND!  DragonBRockin | 02/07/04
Misguided  tgrady | 02/09/04
I'll Pay for it When they Work for it  voska | 02/09/04
Brilliant Post  voska | 02/09/04
When will people get it?  WhoIsDaMan | 02/07/04
What's wrong with this picture?  SublimeDaze | 02/09/04
Do you think....  tgrady | 02/09/04
It's easy to be anyone  SublimeDaze | 02/09/04
Another question..  mijohnso69 | 02/09/04
Radio Stations do pay  MitchDev | 02/09/04
ASCAP fees  AbsolutelyNot | 02/10/04
Free market and RIAA or Economics 101  mijohnso69 | 02/09/04
Time for a class-action RICO suiot against the RIAA  Spikey-01 | 03/04/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here