On Metacritic: How to predict the Oscar winners
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Ina Fried
Posted on ZDNet News: Feb 6, 2004 9:02:00 PM

Hit with a stock-option transfer program and higher payroll costs, Microsoft's server and tools business posted a hefty operating loss in the December quarter.

The unit lost $204 million, as compared with a $234 million profit in the same quarter a year earlier, according to a quarterly report filed Friday with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Microsoft's two other main units--the client business, which includes desktop versions of Windows, and the information worker unit, which includes Office sales--posted narrow improvements in their profits from a year ago.

Microsoft reports sales numbers for each of its business units as part of its quarterly earnings releases but does not note the profit or loss of each segment until it formally files with the SEC a few weeks later. In January, Microsoft reported earnings that topped expectations, excluding substantial charges for stock-based compensation and a stock option transfer program that allowed employees to sell underwater stock options.

The company also said in January that the stock-option transfer program dented overall profits by $1.48 billion, or 14 cents per share.

In its formal filing Friday, Microsoft attributed the loss in the server and tools business to the $651 million in costs incurred as part of the stock option transfer program and to a growing work force in the division. The stock program allowed employees to sell their underwater stock options to Wall Street firm JP Morgan.

"While revenue increased 21 percent, Server and Tools reported an operating loss because of stock-based compensation costs of $651 million related to the employee stock option transfer program, and a 10 percent increase in operating expenses including head-count related costs," Microsoft said in the filing.

A quarter earlier, the server unit, which includes Windows Server and other server software and developer tools, had been posting year-over-year gains in profit, while the Office and desktop Windows units saw their profits dip.

The company's other business units also all took a hit as a result of the stock option transfer program, although Microsoft managed to grow profits in its two other main businesses. The client unit grew profits to $2.07 billion, from $1.95 billion a year earlier, while the information worker unit saw profits reach $1.67 billion, up from $1.66 billion.

As for Microsoft's other units, the company posted a $79 million loss in its MSN business--that's smaller than the $197 million loss reported a year ago, but it follows a $58 million profit in the immediately preceding quarter. The Microsoft business solutions unit saw its loss narrow to $69 million from $87 million a year ago.

The home and entertainment unit, which includes the Xbox game console, narrowed its loss as well, to $394 million, from $412 million a year earlier. Meanwhile, the loss in the mobile and embedded device unit rose to $112 million from $75 million a year earlier.

The company also posted a wider loss for corporate and other expenses, recording $1.41 billion in such losses, as compared with $845 million a year earlier.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 60 Talkback(s)
Well, that's good info for the ppl posting MS is done
or MS is toast, or like statements then. Fine by me. (Read the rest)
Posted by: FilledOut Posted on: 02/09/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Will post a profit next quarter  Christian_<>< | 02/06/04
It's OK; don't panic  michael-t | 02/06/04
By re-structure you mean...  B.O.F.H. | 02/06/04
Windows 2003 Advanced Server???  Confused by religion | 02/06/04
Enterprise?  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 02/06/04
My mistake, Windows 2003 toy!  B.O.F.H. | 02/06/04
Five 9's?  toadlife | 02/07/04
99.999% uptime is from the IBM S/390  B.O.F.H. | 02/07/04
99.999% uptime  km4hr@... | 02/07/04
...  toadlife | 02/07/04
uptime  randomletter | 02/09/04
if bill gates was a women he'd be Marth Stewart (nt)  stephen732@... | 02/06/04
That's not fair.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 02/09/04
too bad  JWatson77 | 02/07/04
You're assuming...  scotus | 02/07/04
ok whatever  optimaloptimusprime | 02/07/04
from Junk to a little better junk  James Schroer | 02/08/04
Testies, testies...  Spoon Jabber | 02/08/04
Geez. They lose a lot of $$  supoman | 02/06/04
You don't get it, do you?  Fred Fredrickson | 02/06/04
obviously you don't get it  stephen732@... | 02/06/04
Done. Next question?  Fred Fredrickson | 02/07/04
And Stung By Windows 2003 Server's Quality Issues  brenthawkinsmd | 02/06/04
See you M$ shills! We've all been telling you that Microsoft is done!!!  Bobby Sskcat | 02/06/04
Did you read past the headline?  KTLA | 02/06/04
Fun with numbers  Chad_z | 02/06/04
411 - 651 = (204) ???  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 02/06/04
Who's fooling you?  StorageGuru | 02/06/04
Linux is cannibalizing Windows server sales too.  DonnieBoy | 02/06/04
Death spiral for linux  StorageGuru | 02/07/04
Your post is hard to follow  IT_User | 02/07/04
Not Microsoft.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 02/08/04
NetCraft is not that great  A.Sinic | 02/09/04
Not if you don't agree with them, I guess.  Immanuel Tranz-Mischen | 02/09/04
how do you know employees won't have stock options to exercise?  hipparchus | 02/06/04
Who told you  michael-t | 02/06/04
Looking at the results  michael-t | 02/06/04
Read past the headline  KTLA | 02/06/04
We have...  Bobby Sskcat | 02/06/04
Any way you cut it, they aint makin much on servers compared to the Desktop  DonnieBoy | 02/06/04
who says it's a one-time stock expense?  hipparchus | 02/06/04
It's a matter of public record  marksashton | 02/08/04
It is not my fault  michael-t | 02/06/04
That you again, bitty?  NoB$ | 02/07/04
MS will be dead in 5 years!  mlindl | 02/06/04
Hmm I smell Enron  nograin | 02/06/04
Sorry not even close  Squawkbox | 02/07/04
(NT) "There is no evidence of that here." keyword is 'yet' :o)  Jack-Booted EULA | 02/07/04
Well this has to be more than a coincidence  Richard Flude | 02/06/04
Gee, if it weren't for their monopoly OS, they would have lost money...  Plain Logic | 02/06/04
Not really accurate  Robert Crocker | 02/07/04
Hey, they have to compete head-on, they can't make money.  DonnieBoy | 02/06/04
underwater stock option excising - in reality this is pay, not a one-off  hipparchus | 02/06/04
xp big killer  JWatson77 | 02/06/04
So much for the stock option incentive.  gordon@... | 02/06/04
Why should Microsoft have to show earnings for different . . .  K B | 02/07/04
Wow, M$ and $un sound like same company  FilledOut | 02/07/04
MS and Sun? Hahahahaha!  marksashton | 02/08/04
Well, that's good info for the ppl posting MS is done  FilledOut | 02/09/04
Positioning of MS as "fallible" for regulators  KeithRisler | 02/09/04

What do you think?

SmartPlanet

Click Here