On Metacritic: Dante's Inferno: A disappointment?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Stephen Shankland
Posted on ZDNet News: Mar 1, 2004 3:25:00 PM

The SCO Group, which claims ownership to the Unix operating system, identified on Monday a company that has agreed to sign a license to use Linux.

EV1Servers.net, a Houston-based company that hosts Web sites for clients and a division of Everyones Internet, signed a deal with SCO for running thousands of Linux servers without facing legal consequences from SCO. EV1Servers.net didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.


Get Up to Speed on...
Open source
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


SCO spokesman Blake Stowell declined to say how much EV1Servers.net paid but said the arrangement covered the "vast majority" of about 20,000 servers, and therefore got a high-volume discount on the $699 per single-CPU server that SCO asks.

Stowell said a "handful" of the world's 1,000 biggest companies have signed such licenses, but all have required confidentiality agreements. EV1Servers.net is the first that allowed its name to be used.

SCO asserts that the Linux operating system infringes on its Unix intellectual property, a claim at the heart of lawsuits that it has brought against Linux advocates IBM and Novell and that top Linux seller Red Hat has brought against SCO.

Lindon, Utah-based SCO has been demanding that Linux users purchase a SCO intellectual property license to use Linux.

SCO, which has retained high-profile attorney David Boies for its legal actions, has said it will sue Linux users, but it missed a mid-February deadline by which to do so.

Although it's been demanding license fees since August, SCO began selling its SCO IP license online only in February. The launch of the online sales was complicated by a denial-of-service attack that knocked the ordering site out of business, one of several such Internet attacks.

SCO announced in August that a Fortune 500 company had signed a license.

Meanwhile, the company has backed off another aggressive action. It said in September that it planned to send invoices to Linux users, but then scuttled the idea the next month.

SCO began arguing a year ago that IBM illegally moved Unix technology to Linux that it was required to keep secret; the company now seeks more than $5 billion in damages from IBM.

SCO also sued Novell, a recent Linux convert and a prior owner of the Unix technology, over Novell's assertions that it still owns Unix copyrights.

In addition, Red Hat, the leading seller of Linux, filed a suit seeking a declaration that the company didn't violate SCO's copyrights or trade secrets.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 61 Talkback(s)
They have paid...
Maybe not in money, but if they have complied with the GPL, then they've paid any "costs" associated with using it.

Other than that, i would draw the line (were i their customer) at how much it... (Read the rest)
Posted by: ryusen Posted on: 03/03/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
One born every minute  doctormoriarty | 03/01/04
SCO deceit  rgriffith64@... | 03/01/04
Way to go SCO!!!  Robert Crocker | 03/01/04
Would EC1Services be in violation of the GPL?  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Strange that you ask ...  Ardian Daka | 03/01/04
So for the cost of the media plus distribution  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Wrong on EV1Servers.net  Ardian Daka | 03/01/04
Incorrect on GPL  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Wrong  Ardian Daka | 03/01/04
Read the Link adaka  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Ref: the link  Ardian Daka | 03/02/04
Well how about IBMs lawyers then  David Mohring | 03/03/04
Crocker is not a lawyer  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
The "Data Protection Scam" and other crimes  David Mohring | 03/01/04
And neither is William Cheeseberger  Bobby Sskcat | 03/01/04
Neither is Boby the SS Cat (NT)  Ardian Daka | 03/01/04
Lame Bill, real Lame  Robert Crocker | 03/01/04
Crocker is not a lawyer!  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
Bill Weisgerber is clueless: So Say IBM's Lawyers  David Mohring | 03/01/04
If you can't maintain context, you'll never succeed!  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
The terms of SCO's UNIX-IP license violate GPL  David Mohring | 03/01/04
please explain your definition of a liscence  NemesisNL | 03/01/04
Make SCO pay it all back  nograin | 03/01/04
Don't count on it  Michael Kelly | 03/01/04
My Prediction...  BanjoPaterson | 03/01/04
havn't you knowticed  JWatson77 | 03/01/04
Wrong!!!!  vferrara | 03/01/04
In the meanwhile in Germany...  ghetyei | 03/01/04
... and probably not by coincidence, either.  Zogg | 03/01/04
Well...  TrollSlayer | 03/01/04
Sucker??  gordon@... | 03/01/04
The "Data Protection Scam" and other crimes  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Just a curiosity questions  vferrara | 03/01/04
Until we get real answers to the *REAL* curios questions  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Makes EV1 look stupid  Arrg | 03/01/04
Makes EV1 look like they care  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
No, it makes them look reeeeeaaaallly stupid  Xunil_Sierutuf | 03/01/04
You have to pay to play  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
They have paid...  ryusen | 03/03/04
Makes EV1 look like Microsoft lackey  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Na.. I still think it makes them look stupid  Arrg | 03/01/04
Their customers may not agree  issthatso | 03/01/04
No, it makes them look stupid  NoB$ | 03/01/04
Here's an example of how stupid it is:  Arrg | 03/01/04
Just another monthly press release.  gordon@... | 03/01/04
SCO excited about having customer  rgriffith64@... | 03/01/04
Blackmail is legal ... in hands of SCO ( MS ? ) (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/01/04
This is interesting  Chipper1963 | 03/01/04
SCO LIcense needed to run Windows  B.O.F.H. | 03/01/04
Microsoft has licensed the SCO IP  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
"No," Sontag said. Microsoft merely licensed an API layer  David Mohring | 03/01/04
Microsoft to license Unix from SCO  B.O.F.H. | 03/01/04
It?s always interesting why people wanna be as blind as Justice (NT)  Vily Clay | 03/01/04
No it's not if you've bothered checking EV1Servers.net  Ardian Daka | 03/01/04
And they offer Windows servers as well  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
my golly miss molly  JWatson77 | 03/01/04
So why did they switch to Microsoft?  ghetyei | 03/01/04
because it's a PR scam  Romanval | 03/01/04
They do both, silly  Bill Weisgerber | 03/01/04
Corrections to the article  Richard Flude | 03/01/04
Windows owns 25% of SCO, huh ?  bigbearpcs2 | 03/01/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here