On CHOW: Can nutmeg make you hallucinate?
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Matt Hines
Posted on ZDNet News: Mar 16, 2004 6:41:00 PM

Open-source software maker Lindows reported on Tuesday that it has asked a U.S. District Court to block Microsoft from filing additional trademark lawsuits against the company in foreign countries.

Get Up to Speed on...
Open source
Get the latest headlines and
company-specific news in our
expanded GUTS section.


Lindows filed the measure in the District Court of the state of Washington in hopes of stopping Microsoft from bringing new legal complaints overseas. The filing marks the latest move in Lindows' wide-ranging dispute with Microsoft regarding trademark rights to the Windows name.

At the base of the legal battle, first launched in 2001, is Microsoft's belief that Lindows' name violates its trademarks for the word "windows," the name of the software giant's ubiquitous operating system. San Diego-based Lindows markets a version of the open-source Linux operating system with an interface similar to Windows.

A Microsoft spokesman responded to the filing by stating that the company believes that Lindows is infringing on its Windows trademark in a number of different countries and that it will take steps to defend its holdings internationally. The representative also said Microsoft is not looking for courts to regulate its legal affairs outside of their respective jurisdictions and that it continues to ask Lindows to adopt a "distinctive name of its own" in order to limit confusion between the company and its own products.

In February, the U.S. District Court in Seattle told the jury in Microsoft's trademark case to consider whether the Windows moniker was generic before the software maker introduced Windows 1.0 in 1985. The judge in that case also postponed a March 1 trial date, itself a delayed start, to an unspecified time, pending an appeal from Microsoft.

Lindows loses one round
As Microsoft continues to wait for a final ruling in its U.S. suit against Lindows, it has embarked on an international legal campaign along the same lines. The Redmond, Wash.-based company most recently took its gripe to Canada, where it filed a trademark infringement suit in that country's Federal Court in Ottawa.

While the fight has thus far tilted in Lindows' favor, as the company continues to do business under its name, it did lose one round in Dutch courts. In January, a judge there issued a preliminary injunction, barring the company from selling or advertising any products under the Lindows name in the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. Courts in Finland and Sweden have issued similar injunctions.

As a result of those rulings, Lindows said it would market itself in the Benelux countries under the name "Lin---s." However, last week Lindows reported that that it received papers from Microsoft, asking the Dutch court to fine Lindows $123,000 (100,000 euros) per day for not blocking visitors to its regular Web site from those three countries.

Lindows Chief Executive Michael Robertson has previously accused Microsoft of searching for favorable courts to levy its claim in and said Tuesday that the company is delaying the U.S. case in order to saddle his business with legal fees from the overseas lawsuits.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 68 Talkback(s)
LMFFAO
Windows is a generic name. Its already law that you can change a generic name into a TradeMark no matter how much money you throw at it. Therefore Microsoft are just greedy sob's. WE all know Lindows isn't Microshaft. Its far too stable to be Windoze. Get a life... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Always Annoyed Posted on: 04/04/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
greedy!  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
How about  JoeMama_z | 03/16/04
Does that mean Anderson windows pays  el1jones | 03/16/04
its not like we have a shortage of idiots in this world.  JoeMama_z | 03/16/04
exactly!  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
ok fine  JoeMama_z | 03/16/04
Lindows is a knockoff of a GENERIC term - perfectly legal  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
Poor analogy  sa_z | 03/16/04
huh?  JoeMama_z | 03/16/04
You're going way overboard  IT_User | 03/16/04
Only two possibilities  RedHat9User | 03/17/04
how about...  ryusen | 03/16/04
LMFFAO  Always Annoyed | 04/04/04
Jurisdiction?  vferrara | 03/16/04
If they were doing it to drive up cost for Lindows, yes, very ilegal.  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
Be Verrrrry Careful!  becksdark | 03/17/04
Of course thhere is no jurisdiction.  FirstNLastN | 03/16/04
Microsoft is a US corporation, you bet US courts have jurisdiction.  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
Sorry, your dead wrong.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/16/04
So it would be ok for MS to operate a child prostitution business??  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
Is child prostetution illegal. is filing a law suit.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/16/04
Are you smart enough to realize that it's ilegal to file lawsuits sometimes  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
It is if the Judge rules that you can do it  voska | 03/17/04
What weakens US courts?  IT_User | 03/16/04
But it's a US company  voska | 03/17/04
Better example...  Rabid Conservative | 03/17/04
US judges not that stupid?  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
What applies to the US applies to Dutch courts as well...  Rabid Conservative | 03/17/04
Belongs in a tabloid  US Chistian | 03/16/04
IT Christian is that you?  MkIIISupra | 03/16/04
ZDNet news is pretty much tabloid stuff for the IT industry.  B.O.F.H. | 03/16/04
Highly Critical of you  nucrash | 03/16/04
LOL (nt)  el1jones | 03/16/04
Here's an idea  IT_User | 03/16/04
he's not a Christian, he's a sneaky ferengi (nt)  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
Free publicity for Lindows, Negative publicity for Microsoft.  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
Like Apple?  amicus_curious | 03/16/04
Apple was NOT generic in the computer industry, Windows was.  DonnieBoy | 03/16/04
exactly  JWatson77 | 03/16/04
Actually...  Rabid Conservative | 03/17/04
Actually...  vferrara | 03/16/04
Ever hear of Xwindows  sa_z | 03/16/04
try again...  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
Fair is fair  amicus_curious | 03/16/04
They asked for it.  Prognosticator | 03/16/04
leave the bleeding heart republicans out of it  stephen732@... | 03/16/04
"bleeding heart republicans"?  rapson | 03/17/04
When if comes to corporate welfare, it fits (NT)  mds_z | 03/18/04
As if the rest of the world listens to our courts.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/16/04
It's not an order against those courts  Michael Kelly | 03/16/04
You may be right  IT_User | 03/16/04
Hogwash!  No_Ax_to_Grind | 03/16/04
No, just confusion created by growing international trade  Rabid Conservative | 03/17/04
Wrong  voska | 03/17/04
Hogwash...NOT!  NottaFan | 03/17/04
Lawsuits as a business model  tic swayback | 03/16/04
Wheres John Carrol....  sa_z | 03/16/04
Windows, ooops Lindows, Lin___ oh just break  FilledOut | 03/16/04
Yessir!  syrynxx | 03/17/04
U work at Maxim?  FilledOut | 03/19/04
Lindows asks court to nix overseas lawsuits  Loverock Davidson | 03/16/04
What confusion? One works and you know about the other one!  brockster | 03/16/04
Which, Linsux or Winsux, maybe  FilledOut | 03/16/04
Windows name and fees..  MAC_95NTXP | 03/17/04
Was windows a "generic C  Sparkie_z | 03/17/04
Was windows a "generic computer term" before 1985  Sparkie_z | 03/17/04
Windows Trademark is invalid by US law  ITSa341@... | 03/19/04
So much for using sound alike in products  FilledOut | 03/21/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

Meet Doc

  • Here to help you with your Document Management Needs
  • Doc is an enigma. Born to a Russian ballerina and a German electrical engineer, he grew up in various locations in the United States. He’s seen the insides of more brands, versions, and generations of printer and printer-related hardware than almost anyone.
  • To learn more about this mysterious figure check out his blog on ZDNet and his Workspace on TechRepublic. You’ll be glad you did.
  • Produced by
    ZDNet and