On CBS.com: Surivor Exclusive Secret Scenes
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Jonathan Skillings
Posted on ZDNet News: Mar 30, 2004 3:55:00 PM

A Georgia company is suing Google over technology that the search giant uses to target advertising at Web surfers based on their location.

Digital Envoy filed the lawsuit Monday afternoon in U.S. District Court in Atlanta, charging that Google violated a licensing agreement when it began offering ads on third-party Web sites, the lawyer representing Digital Envoy confirmed Tuesday.

Several years ago, the two companies struck a licensing agreement allowing Google to use "geo-location" technology invented and developed by Digital Envoy, said Timothy Kratz, a lawyer with the firm of McGuireWoods. The technology uses the Internet Protocol (IP) address of a computer visiting a particular Web site to determine the nearest city in order to direct specific advertisements to the computer's user.

The license allows Google to use that technology on its own site, but not on third-party sites, Kratz said. "If an advertiser is signed up under the massive AdWords program, and if its ad runs on (the Web site of) USA Today, then it's a misappropriation of our technology."

Google representative David Krane declined to comment on the matter because it is pending litigation.

Over the last several years, companies in the highly competitive and increasing lucrative search market have been building and refining their advertising efforts, looking to boost revenue and to ensure the loyalty of visitors. AdWords is one of a number of methods that Google has used to tailor its search results.

Kratz said the problem is that Google derives a significant amount of revenue from these sorts of ads on third-party sites using the technology from Norcross, Ga.-based Digital Envoy.

Google currently is paying $8,000 a month for its use of the Digital Envoy technology and offered to increase that amount by 50 percent, Kratz said. But "if they're making millions, an extra $4,000 a month isn't going to cut it," he said.

A Georgia company is suing Google over technology that the search giant uses to target advertising at Web surfers based on their location.

Digital Envoy filed the lawsuit Monday afternoon in U.S. District Court in Atlanta, charging that Google violated a licensing agreement when it began offering ads on third-party Web sites, the lawyer representing Digital Envoy confirmed Tuesday.

Several years ago, the two companies struck a licensing agreement allowing Google to use "geo-location" technology invented and developed by Digital Envoy, said Timothy Kratz, a lawyer with the firm of McGuireWoods. The technology uses the Internet Protocol (IP) address of a computer visiting a particular Web site to determine the nearest city in order to direct specific advertisements to the computer's user.

The license allows Google to use that technology on its own site, but not on third-party sites, Kratz said. "If an advertiser is signed up under the massive AdWords program, and if its ad runs on (the Web site of) USA Today, then it's a misappropriation of our technology."

Google representative David Krane declined to comment on the matter because it is pending litigation.

Over the last several years, companies in the highly competitive and increasing lucrative search market have been building and refining their advertising efforts, looking to boost revenue and to ensure the loyalty of visitors. AdWords is one of a number of methods that Google has used to tailor its search results.

Kratz said the problem is that Google derives a significant amount of revenue from these sorts of ads on third-party sites using the technology from Norcross, Ga.-based Digital Envoy.

Google currently is paying $8,000 a month for its use of the Digital Envoy technology and offered to increase that amount by 50 percent, Kratz said. But "if they're making millions, an extra $4,000 a month isn't going to cut it," he said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 19 Talkback(s)
What can be "patented"?
In the beginning, patents were issued to mechanical devices that met 3 criteria: "new or novel", "useful", and "unobvious (to those skilled in the trade)". Additionally, one could only patent a specif... (Read the rest)
Posted by: edjsch Posted on: 04/01/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Let's see now  Taz_z | 03/30/04
heheheheeeeeee  will01gt | 03/30/04
Patentable?  vferrara | 03/30/04
OK, you got me...a little  Taz_z | 03/30/04
What patent?  d_jedi | 03/30/04
You are right of course about no patent being mentioned  Taz_z | 03/30/04
patents..  d_jedi | 03/30/04
What can be "patented"?  edjsch | 04/01/04
I wonder if Microsoft is behind this lawsuit?  ordaj@... | 03/30/04
Oh please  George Jay | 03/30/04
Because they're greedy, controlling, and  ordaj@... | 03/30/04
Remember  will01gt | 03/30/04
Yes. Yes I do. And Stac. And Go. And Netscape...  ordaj@... | 03/30/04
Tough Bananas  George Jay | 03/30/04
That's not what they said  el1jones | 03/30/04
Read the whole story next time  rjrapier | 03/30/04
Some links  Nigel Johnstone | 03/30/04
Wow, look what Google stepped in  FilledOut | 03/30/04
Possible Defence  kld113 | 04/01/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Smart Tech Expert advice on innovations in healthcare and the green technologies that make it happen. Find out more
  • Smart Business Discussion and advice on management issues that revolve around making your world smarter and more useful. More Smart Advice
  • Smart People The best and worst moves in the management and strategy trenches. Learn More