On TechRepublic: The 5 worst tech products of 2009
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Martin LaMonica
Posted on ZDNet News: Apr 8, 2004 3:18:00 PM

Microsoft and mainframe software company Micro Focus International have strengthened an alliance aimed at luring away IBM mainframe customers.

At a customer event Thursday in New York, the two companies are expected to announce an extension to their existing partnership and to tout the benefits of moving mainframe applications onto Intel servers that run Windows. In particular, the partnership is designed to provide an alternative to customers who run Customer Information Control System (CICS), a widely used mainframe transaction system.

Tony Hill, CEO of United Kingdom-based Micro Focus, said that by moving a CICS application to Windows, companies can save money and more easily modify software programs. In addition, he said, current mainframe customers can avoid further risk of IBM, ending support for older systems.

IBM declined to comment.

Microsoft has singled out IBM mainframe customers as "ripe" for moving over to Windows.

"I believe (Windows) is a very serious threat to IBM's traditional mainframe base," Hill said. "For both partners, this is a huge strategic opportunity."

Microsoft and Micro Focus will offer products and services for moving mainframe applications to Windows.

Micro Focus server software allows a CICS application to run unchanged on an Intel server running Windows, Hill said. Once mainframe applications written in Cobol are moved over, customers can further maintain and alter the applications using Microsoft's development tools.

Tulane University is one IBM customer that has already shifted to a Windows server. It expects to save $240,000 per year by moving one mainframe application to Windows.

The migration was not "absolutely seamless" but was relatively smooth, said John Lawson, Tulane's chief information officer. Overall, the university expects to save $500,000 per year in licensing costs by moving all its mainframe applications to Windows and Unix servers over the next two years, he said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 21 Talkback(s)
apples vs. oranges ... its nice to have both in the fruit salad.
The million dollar price tag for a mainframe is hard to swallow, when faster & cheaper hardware is available on the Intel platform.

That's pretty much why workstations have been doing th... (Read the rest)
Posted by: oldskool Posted on: 04/08/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
Two sides of this issue  Ardian Daka | 04/08/04
Problems with this logic  ShadeTree | 04/08/04
Problems with this logic too.  phorvath2110 | 04/08/04
Uptime is what MF are for  voska | 04/08/04
Clueless  thepubba | 04/08/04
MF about throughput and manageability too  oldskool | 04/08/04
Per Gartner, mainframe is still the BEST SERVER FOR OLTP  Plain Logic | 04/08/04
And this is why IBM touts Linux  j.m.galvin | 04/08/04
How does....  ShadeTree | 04/08/04
There you go with that common sense thing again.  No_Ax_to_Grind | 04/08/04
The OS is the most expensive part of the MF  nucrash | 04/08/04
You can buy IBM server instead of MF  voska | 04/08/04
Interoperability is the foe of monopoly  oldskool | 04/08/04
Interoperability is the foe of monopoly  seosamh_z | 04/08/04
ya need to define the requirements first ...  oldskool | 04/08/04
And in further news, MS to sell Oceanfront Arizona properties  oldskool | 04/08/04
And in further news, MS to sell Oceanfront Arizona properties  seosamh_z | 04/08/04
OK, I'll bite ...  oldskool | 04/08/04
Most larger mainframe shops not looking to switch - mainly the smaller ones  Plain Logic | 04/08/04
Cheaper Hardware + Better Performance  richman555 | 04/08/04
apples vs. oranges ... its nice to have both in the fruit salad.  oldskool | 04/08/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

Click Here