On CBSNews.com: Loan Delinquencies Hit Record High
BNET Business Network:
BNET
TechRepublic
ZDNet

By Dinesh C. Sharma
Posted on ZDNet News: Apr 21, 2004 3:14:00 PM

Marketers are not complying fully with a new law designed to stop spam, a Jupiter Research survey has found.

Although a majority of the companies tracked provide ways for recipients to opt out of e-mail mailing lists, as required by the federal Can-Spam Act, nearly a fourth of them continued to send e-mail messages to recipients who had submitted requests to unsubscribe, according to the report, which was released this week.

The law requires marketers to reconcile their mailing lists once a week, based on feedback from opt-out requests, but a quarter of marketers indicated that they delete e-mail addresses on a monthly basis, quarterly or never. Many companies even stated in e-mail footers that they could not comply with the law's 10-day standard.

Jupiter Research tracked 55 leading e-mail marketers in sectors such as retail, travel, media and financial services. The Can-Spam Act, short for Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing, establishes nationwide standards for sending unsolicited commercial e-mail. It was enacted in December.

Junk e-mail is considered a problem, because it clogs Internet arteries and wastes workers' time. E-mail service providers like Yahoo and America Online have filed lawsuits against spammers. But opponents of the Can-Spam Act say it actually legalizes spam by laying down rules for sending unsolicited mail.

The Jupiter Research study found that while 21 percent of the marketers allow consumers to simply reply to an e-mail to opt out, about one-third said within their e-mails that "Replies to this e-mail will not be processed."

The Can-Spam Act requires that messages include a valid physical address of the sender, but only 64 percent actually include a street address, according to the report. While the law does not specify that a street address should be included, recent comments from the Federal Trade Commission indicate that an alternative such as a post office box does not meet the law's requirement, Jupiter said.

SponsoredWhite Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

  • Talkback
  • Most Recent of 5 Talkback(s)
The solution is easy
Why cant the US Government pass a do not spam list, where people who do not wish to receive spam can add their email address. The law should be passed blocking spam is where the reciepient of the ema... (Read the rest)
Posted by: Barebear94 Posted on: 05/07/04 You are currently: a Guest | | Terms of Use
What a bullsh*t study!  Mycroft_514 | 04/21/04
The CANSPAM law is B.S., even more so...  shawkins | 04/21/04
What a great-freaking-big suprise... not.  John E Wahd | 04/21/04
Opt-Out?  beepster | 04/22/04
The solution is easy  Barebear94 | 05/07/04

What do you think?

advertisement
advertisement

White Papers, Webcasts, and Downloads

SmartPlanet

  • Thought-provoking progressive ideas on diverse topics that intersect with technology, business, and life, and matter to the world at large. Visit SmartPlanet
  • More from IBM
  • Innovate your business' process model, play against the market, compete against others on our scoreboards and WIN! Try INNOV8 2.0: A BPM Simulator
  • Enabling Real-World Business Transformation through IBM Service Management Read the EMA Analyst Report
advertisement
Click Here